I can’t wait to see what no consequences he’ll face for this.
this post was submitted on 04 Jul 2025
113 points (100.0% liked)
politics
24577 readers
2684 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Apparently 'Shylock' and 'shyster' are etymologically unrelated. Shylock is a Jewish moneylender from Shakespeare, and not a particularly pleasant fellow. Shyster is from the Germanic word for shit, and also used to describe a disreputable person of any race or religion.
He'll deliver an EO tomorrow declaring 'Shylock' to be a superlative to 'Rabbi'.
deliver an EO
Is that a euphemism for shitting an EO?
(Edit) Full quote from rally:
Think of that: no death tax, no estate tax, no going to the banks and borrowing from, in some cases, a fine banker. And in some cases, Shylocks and bad people.
I hate to give the guy a pass, but to be fair, I wasn't aware that was a slur (or even a word). If anything, it sounds more like a homophobic term.
Edit: yeah, actually that's a hard one to right a pass on.
If you know the word, then you know it's a slur. His history of antisemitic statements guarantees he knew what it meant.
In the context of bankers and borrowing, your read is that "shylock" here refers to gay people?
I hate Trump as much as the next guy, but I don't think he's being antisemitic here. He's just the usual Trump: crass and uneducated.
Kind of like when he famously said "The only kind of people I want counting my money are little short guys who wear yarmulkes every day” in the 90's: he wasn't being an antisemite, just being a sleazebag.
Well, he's still a sleazebag. You don't make a racehorse out of a donkey.
That's definitely antisemitic. There's absolutely no ambiguity here.
"If I frame my blatant racism as supposedly a compliment it can't be racism right?"
Sure it's slightly better than openly hating and denigrating a race, but it's still racist. They don't understand this.
Fucking what has this guy ever done to deserve the benefit of the doubt? Seriously?
He's been spewing antisemitism like this since at least 2015. (I didn't pay much attention to him before then)
It's not just ignorance when it's pointed out repeatedly over the years and you keep doing it.
ExtremeDullard is wrong. End of transmission.
Fucking false dummy
I doubt that Trump has ever read Shakespeare.
I doubt that Trump has ever read ~~Shakespeare~~.
He has, however, read a collection of Hitler's speeches:
Last April, perhaps in a surge of Czech nationalism, Ivana Trump told her lawyer Michael Kennedy that from time to time her husband reads a book of Hitler's collected speeches, My New Order, which he keeps in a cabinet by his bed. Kennedy now guards a copy of My New Order in a closet at his office, as if it were a grenade. Hitler's speeches, from his earliest days up through the Phony War of 1939, reveal his extraordinary ability as a master propagandist.
"Did your cousin John give you the Hitler speeches?" I asked Trump.
Trump hesitated. "Who told you that?"
"I don't remember," I said.
"Actually, it was my friend Marty Davis from Paramount who gave me a copy of Mein Kampf, and he's a Jew." ("I did give him a book about Hitler," Marty Davis said. "But it was My New Order, Hitler's speeches, not Mein Kampf. I thought he would find it interesting. I am his friend, but I'm not Jewish.")
Later, Trump returned to this subject. "If I had these speeches, and I am not saying that I do, I would never read them."
I'm more surprised that he reads. I thought he was basically illiterate lol.
The most likely theory is that he desperately needs reading glasses, but is too proud to wear them. So he simply can’t read anything in public, because he needs the glasses that he keeps in his room.
He does read the teleprompter occasionally, but the reading glasses theory makes sense.
I doubt that Trump has ever read anything.
Having said that, he could have watched this excellent Merchant of Venice movie starrting Al Pacino, so he would know who Shylock is.
Busting out the slur deep cuts