this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2025
179 points (100.0% liked)

World News

48183 readers
2020 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The police officer who killed Indigenous teenager Kumanjayi Walker in 2019 was "racist" and had an "attraction" to adrenaline-style policing, a coroner's inquest has found.

Walker, 19, died shortly after he was shot three times at close range by Constable Zachary Rolfe during a home arrest in Yuendumu, a remote Indigenous community in the Northern Territory (NT).

Rolfe - no longer a policeman - was charged with Walker's murder and acquitted in 2022, sparking protests about Indigenous deaths in custody.

In delivering her findings, Judge Elisabeth Armitage said Walker's death was "avoidable" and there was "clear evidence of entrenched, systemic and structural racism" within NT's police force.

top 13 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 day ago (1 children)

a policeman? racist? why, I'm shocked, I tell you, just shocked.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Who shot a teen as soon as he saw they were aboriginal? No way!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

That’s not how it went down but why let facts get in the way of a good story?

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 day ago (1 children)

“Adrenaline-style policing”: new policing methodology just dropped. What are the pros and cons of it versus, say, Peelian community policing?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Pro: It's radical and cool and you get to shoot your gun! Pew! Pew!
Con: You occasionally has cases of innocent minorities getting shot by racists

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

I think the police see these both as pros.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 day ago

I'm not just glad this was finally put right but also-

In her findings, Judge Armitage found that Rolfe made a "series of flawed decisions" that led to "officer-induced jeopardy" - a situation where police "needlessly put themselves in danger... creating a situation that justifies the use of deadly force".

She also said Rolfe - a former soldier - found combat situations "exhilarating" and had an "attraction to adrenalin policing". He had also ignored an arrest plan for Walker created by a female officer because he "thought he knew better", Judge Armitage said.

We can finally start to well... police, police being adrenalin junkies and deliberately putting themselves in harms way.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 22 hours ago

Acquitted in 2022, seems like a retrial is in order. Corruption seems to be at play.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

(゚〇゚)

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

The "racist" between quotes in the headline just means that that one word is a direct quote from someone or something, wheas the rest of the headline is paraphrased. In this case it's a direct quote from a coroner’s inquest by Judge Armitage.

I'm not a fan of this style of quoting, since writing singular words between quotes could easily also be read as insincerity or sarcasm. But it seems to be pretty common in English language media.

Edit: Judge Armitage also writes that this police officer being racist isn't just incidental, but rather that the police station he is working at apparently has a work-place culture that has normalised racism (as per the article)

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

It's specifically quoting someone so that the guy can't sue for defamation. The article isn't calling him racist.