Gaymen 🙏
World News
A community for discussing events around the World
Rules:
-
Rule 1: posts have the following requirements:
- Post news articles only
- Video links are NOT articles and will be removed.
- Title must match the article headline
- Not United States Internal News
- Recent (Past 30 Days)
- Screenshots/links to other social media sites (Twitter/X/Facebook/Youtube/reddit, etc.) are explicitly forbidden, as are link shorteners.
-
Rule 2: Do not copy the entire article into your post. The key points in 1-2 paragraphs is allowed (even encouraged!), but large segments of articles posted in the body will result in the post being removed. If you have to stop and think "Is this fair use?", it probably isn't. Archive links, especially the ones created on link submission, are absolutely allowed but those that avoid paywalls are not.
-
Rule 3: Opinions articles, or Articles based on misinformation/propaganda may be removed. Sources that have a Low or Very Low factual reporting rating or MBFC Credibility Rating may be removed.
-
Rule 4: Posts or comments that are homophobic, transphobic, racist, sexist, anti-religious, or ableist will be removed. “Ironic” prejudice is just prejudiced.
-
Posts and comments must abide by the lemmy.world terms of service UPDATED AS OF 10/19
-
Rule 5: Keep it civil. It's OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It's NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
-
Rule 6: Memes, spam, other low effort posting, reposts, misinformation, advocating violence, off-topic, trolling, offensive, regarding the moderators or meta in content may be removed at any time.
-
Rule 7: We didn't USED to need a rule about how many posts one could make in a day, then someone posted NINETEEN articles in a single day. Not comments, FULL ARTICLES. If you're posting more than say, 10 or so, consider going outside and touching grass. We reserve the right to limit over-posting so a single user does not dominate the front page.
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
Lemmy World Partners
News [email protected]
Politics [email protected]
World Politics [email protected]
Recommendations
For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.
https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/
- Consider including the article’s mediabiasfactcheck.com/ link
Gay be with you.
And also with you
Let us gay.
The blessings document generated considerable conservative backlash, and some critics of the late Pope Francis had expressed hope that Pope Leo would rescind or ignore it.
Conservatives as always doing a fantasticdemonstrating why they should be chronodeported 2 millennia back.
Are the American conservatives even following Vatican? Who gives a fuck about them? That's like British being upset about whatever pope says.
Jokes on them. I don’t even want to go to heaven unless I can suck a bag of dicks on the other side of the gates.
Sucking Dick Through The Pearly Gates would be a great name for an autobiography if you want to use it
Gloryhole, gloryhole, hallelujah!
Or a good album title
Depending on your interpretation of the Bible, you're at least minimum guaranteed marriage to Jesus. Revelations 19
But from my lay perspective there is not a passage in the Bible that says gay sex is worse than eating shellfish so do with that what you will. The thing Jesus actually mentions several times explicitly was adultery aka being unfaithful as in cheating. So as long as its consensual and your not wrecking houses.....
Isn't Jesus already married to every Nun?
Also, just to note, there is a whole lot of talk about "sexual immorality"in the Bible, which is nearly universally translated to mean "homosexuality".
What the fuck does "sexual immorality" even mean? The only thing I can think of would be rape, but I sincerely doubt that was the intention.
Rape incest and pedophilia are the immoralities as written out in the Bible. Also lust to an extent.
Also, technically yes, all the nuns who have taken vows of Chastity are married to the church as are the pastors...
Rape, incest and pedophilia
Oh so kind of like when Lot's daughters raped him?
How did humanity arise from Adam and Eve without incest?
The Bible isn't always meant to be taken literally good luck trying to explain that to a Baptist though. (Jesus almost exclusively spoke in metaphors AKA parables ) The first part of Genesis is describing how early hominids became humans. Personally I like the idea that God is more of a 4th dimensional entity that time does not constrain in any form. Basically a mad scientist using what we call evolution to slowly shape and change his petri dish of a planet.
Isn't it cool how you can just decide which parts are real and which ones aren't?
Edit: Also, it's kind of hard to call Adam and Eve "allegory" or whatever, when there's massive sections of the Old Testament dedicated to outlining their fucking bloodline...
Gotta get a pearl necklace to match the pearly gates!
(Th)I(s) would kill a Victorian child.
You will be shocked to learn that gays don't need a 'blessing' or the 'church'. We are quite happy (gay!!) without any of that.
There are gay members of the catholic church who would disagree with you. This is important to them.
There are also us gays who aren't members of the church, but really wish we could be (but won't, because of gestures wildly at the church with frantic, panicked eyes)
I don't understand, why would you want to be part of a group you trust so little?
Childhood indoctrination and abuse leading to guilt.
I'm going to speak for them since I haven't seen a reply, so this is just an assumption and should be taken as such until they reply. But, there's plenty of positive aspects of local churches outside of faith. Many churches run community-based philanthropy efforts and provide a gathering space for members and nonmembers which is especially helpful in locations that don't have much in the way of things to do or other places to gather. Humans are social creatures and whether gay or not, the church is a large community.
Hell, no one trusts the Internet, but still comes back to participate.
In almost every case it's because they were indoctrinated at an early age. Feels like child abuse to me, but since the vast majority of people are Christians in most countries, it's considered a-okay.
why would you want to be if you are not already? honest question
Spiritual tradition, for starters. I also feel deep connection to liturgical traditions, and there's a lot besides that I like about the RCC. I like that, generally, there's someone at the church at any given time, that the building doesn't stand empty for all but a few hours once per week. That I could go, and light a candle, and sit in contemplation, or speak with a priest. I like confession, I like a lot about the way the RCC functions. I just dislike the scandals, the bigotry, the, frankly, hatefulness that the church has proudly warn over the centuries. A big reason why I'm an Episcopalian is that it's progressive, while also being liturgical. There are more progressive churches like the MCC, but they're more congregational and remind me too much of the baptist churches I grew up in.
While it's probably not important for a lot of people, for me, having that line of demarcation between the sacred and the secular, the robes and the chalices and the incense and bells, the line that says "this is a sacred space, one for meditation, contemplation, prayer" is important. It allows me to leave behind a certain mindset and enter a new one. Regardless of our ideas behind religion and spirituality, humans have been doing ritual for thousands, and potentially millions, of years. There's a power behind it, even if it's just in our heads. Nobody in Christendom does ritual quite like the Catholics. The episcopalians are good at it, but only on Sunday morning, and as much as I love the tradition, it lacks a lot of the spiritual tradition, like intercession of saints and a Marian ideology that I also crave. Anglocatholics are pretty good for that, but they tend to be conservative and anti gay, and most of them have moved to the ACNA, a schismatic group founded against the ordination of women and gay men.
There's a lot to dislike about the RCC, and organized religion in general. I disagree with a huge chunk of it. The prohibition against marriage for priests has lead to so many problems. There's too much to list, from the way nuns are treated, the prohibitions against birth control, LGBTQ+ issues, abortion, surrogacy... There's a lot wrong with the institution. But I don't think we should throw the baby out with the bathwater. It'll never happen, but I dream of a day when there's major reform within the Church.
I just want a hyper progressive RCC with a married trans woman pope :(
Edit to add:
Feel a bit like I've misrepresented myself, so to clarify: I'm an Episcopalian, but I'm also a nondualist Advaitin (Hindu). I am not your average viewer or really anyone's target audience, so don't extrapolate my comments to the larger religious/gay community. Haha.
I'm an Episcopalian, but I'm also a nondualist Advaitin (Hindu).
I'm no expert on Hinduism, so maybe I'm completely wrong here, but I feel like those two things are in direct conflict with one another.
You're breaking like 2 or 3 of the 10 commandments, right off the bat. Yahweh is very jealous.
Not really. There are nondualist traditions within Christianity. Meister Eckhart being the most well known. Nonduality isn't the worshipping of other gods before Yahweh, it's the belief that all that exists is within God. Panentheism isn't incompatible with Christianity, it's just a super niche trend within it, but with lots of historical precedent, even within large Christian organizations like the RCC. They never excommunicated Eckhart, and while he was controversial during his life, his thoughts on nonduality effectively forced the church to admit that it was not heresy.
Going beyond the RCC and into protestantism there is no unifying body to declare what is and isn't allowed, so basically, screw that, imma do what I want.
But if you're at all interested (not in a "Join us!" Way, more in an interesting historical knowledge way), there are tons of nondualist Christians, and I'd be happy to share.
Being a recovering catholic, from a country that is also recovering catholic, I cannot relate to most of your post.
I respect most faiths, but denounce all organized religion, "churches" if you will.
Yeah, there's a lot of damage the church has done. I don't support the RCC. I just wish the RCC could be progressive and keep the liturgical/tradition side of things. Total pipe dream
Apart from directly catholic gays, there are also gays in very catholic countries, where their lives are influenced heavily by catholic stances no matter whether they believe or not.
Sure but it does help with acceptance from the non-gay religious people
Some want that and it's not your place to judge. Not to blow this out of proportion but I have to say the militant atheism on Lemmy feels like 4chan debates sometimes.
That's interesting, because I see a ton of apologetics on here in threads about religion. More than I used to see on reddit before I left a while back.
Seriously though. I'm all for bashing religion but it gets to a point with some people where it starts to detract from the subject at hand.
Sure, YOU may not need it but theres a large amount of people who this is extremely important to. It also helps with acceptance in catholic countries and communities. I'm all for being a card carrying atheist but I just don't feel like it's necessary in this situation.
Are these like normal blessings but rainbow?
I don't care what the international child r*** ring has to say about the gays.
If I am going to choose between imaginary symbolic gestures I rather have G̵̡͖̜̊Ã̴̩̐͂̽Y̴͖̘̤̌́ ̷̨̦͍̜́͊ Ç̷̲̺͕̅͛̌̎͠U̶̟̦͎̼̎R̴̝͚̲̭̣͛̂̕Ś̴̲̼̟͚̈̅E̶̙̩͖͐̑̿̚S̷͈̺̐͆ 😈
How is this news? Magic isn't real and they still think the gays are icky, let's not imagine meaningful progress where none exists.
Perfection is the enemy of progress.
Lack of progress is also an enemy of progress.
I mean, sometimes. But this is still like a... few decades behind. This is like white people not saying the n-word in public anymore. That's technically better than before, but still woefully behind. The Catholic Church is never going to be on the forefront of real progress.
How is this news?
Because something new that plenty of people care about happened? Like, I do think it's ridiculous but there are more than a billion Catholic people out there who do care what this guy says.
In the future, when we're transcendent tentacled robofurries doing poly in virtual space, on drugs (think Yivo from Futurama), we will look back in confusion at why so many people hate homosexuality so much. Like... don't they have other things to worry about?
Or humanity will be all dead, I guess.
And I'm talking about the mega conservatives protesting this; at least the Vatican is baby stepping and trying to minimize their cruelty.
"exclusive, stable, and indissoluble union between a man and a woman, naturally open to the generation of children"