377
submitted 3 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.ml/post/33488629

By MEE staff
Published date: 18 July 2025 20:59 BST

Hardline America Firster and staunch Trump supporter Marjorie Taylor Greene voted alongside progressive Democrat Congresswomen Rashida Tlaib and Ilhan Omar to strip Israel of $500m in US funding, hours after it bombed the Holy Family Catholic Church in Gaza.

The House of Representatives, however, rejected in a 422-6 vote on Thursday, to cut funding for the Israeli Cooperative Program - an agreement through which the US provides Israel with $500m to boost its missile programmes.

It is a separate allocation from the $3.3bn the US sends Israel as "security assistance" every year.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] [email protected] 160 points 3 days ago

Imagine what 3.3bn would do for education in the United States? Fuck Iseral's "security", they can take care of themselves.

[-] [email protected] 43 points 3 days ago

Israel is currently secure enough to be able to commit a genocide while also starting conflicts with neighboring countries. They're acting like they can take care of things on their own, so let them.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 3 days ago

Budgeting around mom's credit card is a nad idea unless you are Israel.

[-] [email protected] 9 points 3 days ago

My husband's theory is that Epstein was a mossad asset so it's more like don't spend moms credit card unless you found her cp stash.

[-] [email protected] 43 points 3 days ago

Not even getting into how Israels have all the "socialism" stuff we say we can't afford for ourselves.

If universal healthcare and free college isn't worth it for Americans, why are we giving Israel billions annually? Shouldn't Israel stop that "frivolous" spending to lower the amount they need from foreign countries?

But like, when they House votes 422-6 for something like this, it's pointless to think logic will change the mind of any of the 422.

It's a hard thing to admit, but we need to be able to say a foreign government has clearly bought off both parties of our government.

And nothing will convince the compromised politicians to stop, we have to vote them out. D or R every one of those 422 needs to go. MTG still needs to go too, there's plenty of other reasons

[-] [email protected] 20 points 3 days ago

Seriously. We subsidize them to the point where they have universal healthcare, social safety nets, robust education, and in return they turned Palestine into a prison state, and now a literal genocide.

We need to realize that Israel gets free passes because their Epstein honey pot ensnared generations of western political leaders, and that's why in America, we need to purge our political leadership of anyone over 65 for registered parties. The world they grew up in is gone, and they were the ones that destroyed it. They can hand over the reigns, or be removed from them forcefully

[-] [email protected] 9 points 3 days ago

They're fighting proxy wars we pay them to fight.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 21 hours ago

Israel has never fought a conflict that was not in their own interest. Israeli troops have never died to help the US.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] [email protected] 10 points 3 days ago

I agree Israel should not be subsidized by the states but 3.3 billion is about ten dollars per American.

[-] [email protected] 43 points 3 days ago

If that money were all distributed to our education system, it would only really go to the children of the US, so it makes less sense to evaluate that money on a per-american basis.

That money would also be going to institutions as opposed to the students, so a more practical evaluation would be to see what amounts would go to each school.

At the end of the day, though, we know that $3.3bn isn't going to education - not even a bit.

load more comments (5 replies)
[-] [email protected] 21 points 3 days ago

Of which, roughly speaking about 23% are under 18 and school-aged if census.gov is to be trusted

Around $40 per student could still do an incredible amount of good across our national school system. A given school's graduating class might range anywhere from 50-2,000 students and you'll have 3-4 of those per school. That's potentially $320,000 for a single large school by this napkin math assuming those funds are distributed perfectly evenly according to student population. If put to more strategic use this could be an incredible boon to lower income schools in many, many areas.

[-] [email protected] 14 points 3 days ago

At the same time, we spend $5.2 billion a year to provide 2.4 billion breakfasts in over 90,000 schools and residential child care institutions. $3.3 million more could feed a lot of hungry kids.

[-] [email protected] 8 points 3 days ago
[-] [email protected] 5 points 3 days ago

Right, that's what I meant

[-] [email protected] 5 points 3 days ago

That’s just for a single military program. We also give $18 Billion a year to Israel and have given something like $200 Billion over the last 70 years to Israel.

[-] [email protected] 8 points 3 days ago

It would do something the GOP doesn’t like. Create people who understand science and reasoning, which is bad for the base.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] [email protected] 22 points 3 days ago

Remember folks, Ms. She-wolf of The SS wants to cut funding to Israel because of her raging hatred of Jewish people and not for the plight of the Palestinian people at the hands of the Israeli state. Also, something something Rothschild Space Lasers, something something George Soros.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Yeah this bill cuts funding for the iron dome, putting Israeli civilians in danger without cutting funding for the bombs being used to kill Palestinians, and Iranians, and ... Every other neighboring country. Ask this does is ensure even more people in the middle east will die.

[-] [email protected] 9 points 3 days ago

counterpoint: weakening the iron dome will increase pressure on Israel to stop its aggressive behavior.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 3 days ago

Not as much as not giving them the weapons at all

[-] [email protected] 44 points 3 days ago
[-] [email protected] 42 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

The House of Representatives, however, rejected in a 422-6 vote on Thursday,

Why is the only thing both sides enthusiastically agree on is giving billions to Israel?

ETA:

"It's becoming like, wait a minute, what about our own country? What about our own people?"

You're this close Marjorie. "Our own country?" No, They own the country. "Our own people?" They own the people.

[-] [email protected] 15 points 3 days ago

Every one of my reps has AIPAC high on their donor list. I am unsure what to say any longer when I call. It feels like my "voice" is too cheap.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

They are God's chosen people, after all. And you, my fellow American, are God's chosen people's piggy bank. That'll be $500,000,000 to keep killing brown people, even AOC says you gotta pay up.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[-] [email protected] 20 points 3 days ago

You go girl! I mean, fuck you, but also you go girl!

[-] [email protected] 19 points 3 days ago

She's MAGA (AKA a Nazi-fetishist), so the motivations are most definitely Jewish-hatred.

There I elaborated your feelings

[-] [email protected] 11 points 3 days ago

Yes, it's wild that the only politicians criticizing Israel are doing it for the wrong reason.

Except for Spain. I think Spain is the only country doing the right thing here for the right reason. Go Spain! And South Africa. Shame on everyone else.

[-] [email protected] 27 points 3 days ago

This was a performative act to drive the narrative. She looks a fool cause she didn't realize the party only follows along to orders from the top (i.e. not her).

And y'all are still playing into it. So it's working anyways. WTF

(╯°□°)╯︵ ┻━┻

[-] [email protected] 10 points 3 days ago

IIRC it was to cut defensive weapon funding ie. Iron Dome. Offensive weapons weren't being touched.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

Doesn't matter. If they know the iron dome is funded they will act more violent knowing they won't face retaliation.

[-] [email protected] 10 points 3 days ago

She's gone so far right that she's circled around.

[-] [email protected] 8 points 3 days ago

Hurrr durrr horseshoe theory

[-] [email protected] 13 points 3 days ago

Insert "we are not the same" meme

[-] [email protected] 9 points 3 days ago

aoc voted against it, and her crashout over the criticism she's getting is not looking good. she's throwing the squad under the bus trying to double down on her inane decision.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Can you explain in detail what you mean? I see her bluesky and she clearly shared the roll call with her voting against the funding.

Edit: nvm i found out by reading the comments on her post. She didnt support an amendment to the defense bill and epsitne didnt kill himself.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 3 days ago

Doesn't cut any offensive weapons shipments. US is still supporting Israel's genocide.

[-] [email protected] 8 points 3 days ago

Marjorie Karen Green actually did something moral for once, and I have mixed feelings.

[-] [email protected] 6 points 3 days ago

Nah. It's still sending money to Israel, just a tiny bit less. It's still sending money for weapons to continue the genocide. Just because it's a little less makes zero effect on the morality, it's still furthering the genocide. It's just phrased to make you think it's doing something to cause less harm. It's not.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 3 days ago
[-] [email protected] 16 points 3 days ago

Confluence of isolationism and being an actual Nazi type, if you forgot about the Jewish Space Lasers.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago

What if they go so far politically right... they come out the other side?

Nah....

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 21 Jul 2025
377 points (100.0% liked)

politics

24898 readers
2863 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS