157
submitted 1 day ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
top 27 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] [email protected] 45 points 1 day ago
[-] [email protected] 41 points 1 day ago

There was a near mid-air collision at LAX today at around 11AM.

There is a severe shortage of ATC in the US. Remember when Reagan fired all the striking ATCs in the 1980s and replaced them with new ones? The new ones are all retiring and there are not enough replacements which means that the remaining ones are all overworked and exhausted.

[-] [email protected] 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Does this mean someone could theoretically fly a plane unimpeded to a location that could fix a ton of political problems in sonic the hedgehog?

[-] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

There has always been a theoretical fear of someone loading up a Cessna with TNT and low-flying that into the oval. When civilian GPS first came about, they had to fuzz certain locations to make this less attractive. So far no one has tried with small automated planes.

These airspaces are controlled by the Air Force tho who would probably notice and implement countermeasures.

[-] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Do you remember when a swarm of automated drones were released from a lorry outside a russian air field and destroyed or damaged 10s of Russian bombers? That was pretty freaking cool. Not really related to anything in this thread in particular, but every now and then I enjoy reminiscing.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 21 hours ago

That is a very cool story and I like it, even if it's got nothing to do with this at all, the things they can do now.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago

AI traffic control trying to kill us. But, the lawsuit is cheaper than employing people.

[-] [email protected] 31 points 1 day ago

When you are seated, have your seatbelt on.

Six minutes after take off and people didn't have their seatbelts on. They won't make that mistake again.

[-] [email protected] 27 points 1 day ago

Seatbelt??? While hurtling through the sky 30,000 feet in the air at 500+ mph?? That's uncomfortable.

[-] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago

Two-point belt at that

[-] [email protected] 20 points 1 day ago

My first thought too. Wear your seat belt unless you’re in the bathroom or walking to it. Planes do crazy shit unexpectedly, now these people are a foot shorter because their necks went inside their body.

[-] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

In theory, takeoff should be one of the safest times on a plane since that is when everything should be the most cleared.

But yeah. Couple years back I was flying back over the Pacific when the pilot got on the intercom telling people to fasten up in less than professional language. Flight attendants were yelling at the people who insisted on staying standing up. Pilot gave a real quick "Everyone get seated now" and one of the flight attendants slammed her ass into the seat next to me. Turbulence was so bad it felt like we dropped a solid 10-20 feet instantly and some people definitely kissed the sky and lots of moaning and groaning.

I can't possibly imagine what a 475 foot dive would feel like. It wouldn't be THAT immediate since it was controlled but... holy shit.

So yeah. If you are seated, buckle your seatbelt.

[-] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago

The most dangerous times for a plane, are when that plane is close to the ground but not on it stationary.

IE landing and takeoff.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Takeoff/landing is by FAR the most dangerous time on a plane. Like, even "in theory" there are just SO MANY more factors that could go wrong compared to when its just cruising in the air.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

Ya, this shits definitely made me change my mind on that lol

[-] [email protected] 31 points 1 day ago

I had that happen in a 747 once. Your stomach just flips. Not something you expect on such large plane. The pilot said it was a "tea cast" maneuver to avoid a head on collision. He said the other plane was a half a mile ahead, which seemed like a long ways until I realized both planes were probably doing 600mph or something like that.

[-] [email protected] 57 points 1 day ago

It's TCAS. The Traffic Alert and Collision Avoidance System is an airborne system that helps pilots avoid mid-air collisions. It works independently of ground-based equipment by monitoring nearby aircraft with transponders and issuing advisories to pilots.

It basically negotiates between two planes and gives them opposing directions automatically so the pilots don't "avoid" each other by going the same direction.

[-] [email protected] 16 points 1 day ago

Two planes dancing in a doorway unable to pass each other.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago

Which one gets to say "oohp"

[-] [email protected] 27 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

TCAS, not "tea cast" (:

TCAS or the "Traffic Collision Avoidance System" is a system that monitors the local airspace around the aircraft, if it detects another aircraft's transponder it will automatically exchange data with the other aircrafts, data like GPS position, altitude, speed, direction and more.

Then compares data received with it's own, and determines the risk to the aircrafts involved, and if there is a risk of a mid air collision it will order the flight crew to take action and even cooperate with the other plane to order specific actions to both air crews.

One will be ordered to decend, the other to climb, and TCAS alerts are treated as a higher priority than even a controller.

Here you can read more about the systen:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Traffic_collision_avoidance_system

[-] [email protected] 32 points 1 day ago

Hawker Hunter?! That's a British military jet from the 40s. Is there another kind? Am I taking crazy pills?

[-] [email protected] 19 points 1 day ago

Several Hawker Hunters, actually. I didn't know so many were even active

[-] [email protected] 29 points 1 day ago
[-] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago

hopefully that bump smooshed his brain worms

[-] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Crackhead Columbo, I call ‘em

[-] [email protected] 11 points 1 day ago

Who the hell is hawker hunter and why is he so tall?

[-] [email protected] 2 points 19 hours ago

Hunter Biden's alter-ego. It's all documented on his laptop, he's actually got superpowers.

this post was submitted on 26 Jul 2025
157 points (100.0% liked)

politics

24936 readers
1213 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS