this post was submitted on 23 Oct 2023
366 points (95.5% liked)

Dungeons and Dragons - Memes and Comics

3730 readers
1 users here now

A community for Dungeons and Dragons Memes and Comics

/c/DnD Network Communities

Rules (Subject to Change)

"Title" - [Comic Name]

e.g. "Krak of Dawn" - [Swords Comic]

*Does not apply to memes

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 33 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 51 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

we need an option for "i agree this is horrible idea"

the upvote is not right. neither is downvote.

we need sidevote

[–] [email protected] 32 points 2 years ago (2 children)

What in the AI fuck is that tiger in the center?

[–] [email protected] 55 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It's an old picture, before AI image generation. It's a tiger teddy with some stuffing removed.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 years ago

Ha, I see that now. I hope AI models aren't trained on this photo as if it's a normal tiger...

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 years ago

Turning into roulade.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Also! This is what the tiger on the bottom hunts for:

https://ibb.co/Npb30v5

[–] [email protected] 22 points 2 years ago (4 children)

I really dislike the caltrop d4s. Numbering styles aside, they just roll so poorly compared to all other polyhedral dice. I really wish that either "crystal" style or "wormhole" style d4s become more commonplace.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 years ago

Fuck d10s then, amirite?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago

Yeah, that's exactly what I meant by "wormhole" style! Those, or the crystal style, are significantly better d4s IMO

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 years ago

This is why I use 8- or 12-sided D4s.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 years ago

I had never heard of one either, so I looked it up and found nothing by the name. The closest thing I could find to the description is these, and I've got to say, I like how they look. I'm curious if this is actually the type they were talking about though.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

I guess they're usually called "rounded d4s" but I think they look like two of those classic spacetime wormhole depictions put together.

Edit:
These dice (top left):

Looks to me like two of these wormholes, one rotated 90 deg, and smooshed together:

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 years ago (1 children)

You could make the bottom one work quite easily by just choosing the number that's NOT visible on an upward face.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 years ago (1 children)

This "quite easily" is >3 times as much work as reading one number on top, because 1-2 faces will be pointed away from you.

What matters is effort per roll compared to the top image, not effort per roll compared to making a sushi roll.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 years ago

do you not play in a hall of mirrors?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 years ago (1 children)

WHAT IF I SAY I'M NOT LIKE THE OTHERS?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 years ago

WHAT IF I SAY I'M NOT JUST ANOTHER ONE OF YOUR PLAYS?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago (3 children)

Yeah, WTF is with the die in the right middle, and right bottom? Garbage plastic for landfills.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

right middlel: you determine the value rolled based on the number on the bottom.

right bottom: you determine the value rolled by deciding which number you like best.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

If the middle one's numbers all match for their adjacent face, it's still usable. You can designate the bottom number to be the selected number, since there's only one side facing down (just as there's only one point facing up).

The bottom one sucks because you'd need to arbitrarily deciding which upward side to choose from.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 years ago (2 children)

Bottom pic is the same as the middle ones, you use the bottom surface. It’s just meant to be viewed from the bottom through a transparent surface. Similar to a magic 8 ball

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Simple, just look for the number not visible and that's the number on the bottom

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago

Technically since the numbers have an orientation, in this case you could know the bottom face only by looking at a single visible surface!

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 years ago (1 children)

You're expected to crawl under the transparent table to see what you rolled?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Well, you could, but most people just use their pocket mirror

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 years ago

You're expected to have a pocket mirror? WTF is a pocket mirror?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago

I really like the middle one better. I find it easier to read the numbers when they’re printed on the edge rather than the border of the triangle and find it easier to read the bottom side rather than the top corner. I’m pretty sure that’s the only kind of d4 I’ve ever owned.