this post was submitted on 18 Jul 2023
35 points (97.3% liked)

Canada

9401 readers
1292 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Anyone remember another time Canada ignored a preponderance of evidence about health affects of a product they said was safe?

top 2 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 years ago

He said legal constraints may have prevented the committee from looking at contentious pesticides, raising questions about transparency.

Well I for one am comforted to know that we have a robust legal system in place to protect [checks notes] pesticide manufacturers from having their products... um... [thumbs through pages] evaluated for safety.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 years ago

Its a shame he stepped down. It seems he really cared about improving the state of pesticide use and research for the good of public health but was held back by beauracracy (and probably corporate profits). Whoever replaces him will probably be complacent in letting pesticide companies continue to poison our land, water, and population while lining their pockets with pesticides lobbying money and a tax payer funded salary.