this post was submitted on 19 Jan 2024
194 points (80.9% liked)

Technology

68348 readers
3507 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Supermarket responds after Reddit user’s warning about self-checkout overcharge — ‘Was annoyed that the total amount due on my supermarket purchase did not equate to the individual items I purchased.’::‘Was annoyed that the amount due on my Woolies purchase did not equate to the individual items I purchased.’

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Schmidtster 131 points 1 year ago (22 children)

So it was resolved instore to their even better benefit, AND the person still went and posted a false story to shame and blame them?

People are fucking weird.

[–] [email protected] 98 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Even if it was a one-time glitch that was resolved in-store, it implies that the prices shown on-screen aren’t necessarily the same prices used internally to compute the total.

That could merit a heads-up post for people to double-check their totals, though not the suggestion of anything more nefarious.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

That's still a major software bug. What a POS.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

It is indeed a Point of Sale, albeit a shitty one

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Not major if it only impacts the price shown on the itemized price screen of clearance mangos in one store and the total price charged is correct.

load more comments (20 replies)
[–] [email protected] 93 points 1 year ago (4 children)

“We’ve looked into this transaction and can confirm that the total of $17.90 was correct, however the mango price of 80 cents each that appeared on the screen was incorrect due to a technical error — they were on clearance for $1.90 each,” the Woolworths spokesperson told 7NEWS.com.au.

“We understand why this customer was concerned and we apologise for the confusion caused. Our team resolved this with the customer in-store, providing the mangoes free of charge.

Seems pretty straightforward and had a good resolution.

[–] [email protected] 40 points 1 year ago (4 children)

But, what kind of software do they have that uses one price source for the unit pricing display and another source for calculating the total? It seems that it is destined to create more problems like this one.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (3 children)

POS software is right up there with vehicle infotainment systems when it comes to reliability and usability. They get the dregs of the programming world because decent coders have a way better selection of companies to work for.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Even when they get decent coders for the base code, feature creep eventually wrecks the system. I know someone who helped write the POS system used in Disney parks, and according to them the system they originally built didn't suck nearly as much as the system I used as a cast member, and it's the hastily tacked on bullshit (causing the initial competent team to quit) that ultimately broke it. That said, I do realize that most people will not admit to shipping shoddy code in the first place.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

IDK, that seems like a really reasonable question tbh.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Seems pretty straightforward and had a good resolution.

Well, except for when the Redditor went home and spread ~~lies~~ technically factual statements presented in a misleading manner and omitting key details with the apparent goal of damaging the reputation of the store despite being treated with kindness and fairness by the manager.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

7news is like that for ya. Lots of petty drama news.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago

Drama seeker article on drama seeker redditor

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago

What a garbage article. I assume this is a bit reporting, otherwise please don't post crap like this from bad news sources.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago (6 children)

This is just how it works in the US and Canada, though.

$1.50 scanned.

Your total is $1.65.

Would you like to make a donation to a children's charity?

  • $1
  • $2
  • $5
  • (other)

Please select a tip percentage:

  • 18%
  • 20%
  • 25%
  • 100%
  • (other)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (8 children)

Tempest in a teapot.

Did they call someone over when they saw the discrepancy? Because, you know, mistakes happen.

I frequently have something not scan, or not come up right. There's a button for help, there's always someone right there anyway, hell, had a clerk walk up and help when he noticed I hit the wrong button. They pay attention.

"I was annoyed"... That a system misreported something? If I was annoyed every time that happened I'd never not be annoyed.

What's with this sudden "self checkout rage bait" this week? Who's pushing what agenda?

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

Ignoring the price discount on the mangos, the answer here is sales tax, right? Because otherwise it would be $15.70. It's a bad design that tax amounts don't show up on the itemized screen (but probably on the final screen after that).

Tell me if anyone knows for sure, otherwise I'm going to assume that's the issue...

EDIT: Thank you folks, asked and answered! Then, I'm back to being very confused...

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Only the US adds sales tax after the original price, everywhere else it's included in the price on the shelf.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not just the US, Canada is like this too.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Unfortunately. Should be all-in price.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago

Itemized prices should already include tax.

Total will also include tax.

But receipts will outline how much of the total was tax.

Source: am Australian

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Doesn't Australia include the tax in the listed price of the item instead of adding it at the end?

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Yes it does

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Every country except the US and Canada does this

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Does Australia charge tax on groceries?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Depends on what it is.

But most raw food is tax free

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The last 4 scanned items listed on screen but “5” items scanned. I’d dare say the fifth items that isn’t shown on screen accounts for the difference?

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 year ago

According to the article the mangos were on sale for a higher price than what showed up on the screen, it totaled them correct but there was a mistake with it saying .80 cents per mango. They gave them the mangos for free apparently and apologized. Same thing would have happened whether or not it was a self checkout or a person, the item was entered incorrectly into the system.

Always verify what you are buying.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

There's 2 mangoes.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

We are living in the future!

load more comments
view more: next ›