this post was submitted on 25 Jan 2024
218 points (100.0% liked)

HistoryPorn

6196 readers
209 users here now

If you would like to become a mod in this community, kindly PM the mod.

Relive the Past in Jaw-Dropping Detail!

HistoryPorn is for photographs (or, if it can be found, film) of the past, recent or distant! Give us a little snapshot of history!

Rules

  1. Be respectful and inclusive.
  2. No harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
  3. Engage in constructive discussions.
  4. Share relevant content.
  5. Follow guidelines and moderators' instructions.
  6. Use appropriate language and tone.
  7. Report violations.
  8. Foster a continuous learning environment.
  9. No genocide or atrocity denialism.

Pictures of old artifacts and museum pieces should go to History Artifacts

Illustrations and paintings should go to History Drawings

Related Communities:

Military Porn

Forgotten Weapons

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 31 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago

With some random people just sort of milling about in the background.

“Oh, they doin’ the streetfightin’ thing again are they? Bus doesn’t come for another 20 min, let’s have a look-sees.”

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

I've always gotta wonder where the fuck the dust cover went when I see pictures of people using/holding AKs without them. They aren't exactly small or something you take off very often, pretty hard to lose

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (3 children)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Communism and fascism are not the same thing. They are opposite ends of the political spectrum.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Red_fascism

Red fascism was a term coined by actual leftists (the original coining was by a Marxist) but largely co-opted by liberals and cryptofascists alike for their anti-communist rhetoric in the Cold War period.

There's no particular reason to think this guy is against totalitarianism in general though, even if you acknowledge the term monarchists and fascists aren't antifa for fighting red fascists.

There's also no particular reason to think he wasn't an anarchist. Or a liberal. Or literally anything besides a Ceausescu supporter.

He was an anti-communist living in Romania and being given quite a lot of reasons to be so, thus the near immediate 1989 Romanian Revolution when the Soviets fell, and that's where our knowledge on his politics ends.

Hell, half the revolutionaries were communists themselves, nearly the entire military defected after the minister of defense was assumedly executed for refusing to give orders to fire on protestors.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Both pretty authoritarian, shitty ideologies tho.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Communism is fine. People are shitty tho. They tend to ruin everything, including capitalism.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Wrong. People aren’t shitty. The power to exploit turns people shitty. Power corrupts people. Hierarchy enforces a rule of shittiness, an opportunity and almost need to exploit. Eliminate the exploitative hierarchy and the concept of people being generally shitty would disappear.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I mean, this just re-enforces what I said. I can't think of one example where people are not eventually corrupted by power. Hence, why people are shitty. It really is in our nature to destroy ourselves. Just look at where we are now. There's no proof we'll get better. It's all just lofty ideals we like to say, which is another shitty thing we do. We are shit.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

communism is fine. People are shitty. That’s why they ruin everything, including capitalism.

This is what you said and what I was responding to (or a reasonable facsimile thereof).

Which is kind of the exact opposite of what you just said.

Communism is both an idealized view of people and their ability to create a system that is best for all—but it’s also overly naive about the entire process because it requires putting a unified party in charge to oversee the transition. So the general thrust of this belief is people are good, and people can be trusted to use their ultimate power for good…and then to willingly step down. Which is where every single communist movement has failed and every person put in power abused it and murdered.

People are shitty. That’s why they ruin everything, including capitalism.

Capitalism is a system that was designed to make people exploit each other. Its founding concept is exploitation. The more people down the line that you exploit, the more profit you have. It’s where underpaying, lobbying, outsourcing and slave labor, insider trading…literally every problem humanity has right now is inextricably tied to capitalism. Because the entire concept is built on exploitation. Screwing over more people = more money.

Do people in your daily life treat you like shit? And I mean just people. Not your boss, but everyday people. No. People on the whole are generally pretty easy going. But the system into which we’ve been born conditions us to hurt each other. We are all encouraged to take from everyone else because it means we get more.

But that is capitalism. That’s not people. If we were all born into a cooperative society…people would be helpful. The instinct to exploit and hurt others would be gone. Of course there are people that are just generally bad and hurtful, but this sense you have of people being generally awful would be gone. Because what you’re seeing is the hand of capitalism bitch slapping everyone. And you’re blaming it on people.

I just think you have it backwards. People are good. Capitalism ruined people. And communism is naive—but only because it believes you can hand a unified party of people ultimate power and they’ll happily relinquish it. Anarchism is the answer. It’s the same concept, but without trusting politicians.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I thought the USSR wasn't communist?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

That simply shows a misunderstanding of dialectical materialism. They attempted communism, got close, but failed to achieve what defines it.

They failed due to under industrialism and external influences, but failed none the less.

Communism is the culmination of a process. Not just something a society does one day.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

After Lenin's death they stopped trying. It failed because Lenin replace one bourgeoisie ruling class with another and expected that class to have the same interests as the working class for some reason. A vanguard party will never work due to different class interests.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

The point I was trying to make is that rhetorically the USSR is in a superposition of Communist/Not Communist that collapses into whichever is most convenient for the commenter at the time

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

In the same way the USA isn’t a democracy, but they were “doing the communism” still

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

It's anti-Authoritarianism. Branding every awful dictatorship as facism helps no one.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I looked for more information on the photo before posting and unfortunately I couldn’t find specifics on the identity of the man pictured.

If he was an anti-communist fighter in Romania, he would have been fighting in its 1989 revolution which overthrew the Warsaw Pact aligned Romanian Communist Party. The result of the overthrow being a republic styled government.

If I find anything specific I will update the post though.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Terrorists don't fight against communism. Freedom fighters do.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

The problem with that statement is, religiouse zealots use the same rethoric

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Does anyone know if he survived?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I have been looking, unfortunately while the picture is widely circulated the person in the photo is not named anywhere I can find. I will update the post if I come across anything.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago