this post was submitted on 01 Feb 2024
20 points (100.0% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

62053 readers
603 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):

🏴‍☠️ Other communities

FUCK ADOBE!

Torrenting/P2P:

Gaming:


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Jack Ryan S3 E3

top 47 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Man... Im watching Stargate sg1 with my kiddo. My Plex server is down for a bit.. so I switched over to prime for an episode or two..

It's dark, it's audio is horrible, it's 4:3 formatted it's horribly compressed and it has commercials.

Talk about a poor viewing experience.

Not watching is better than watching...

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

"it's a strange game. The only way to win is not to play."

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

The worst part is that even buying SG1 on Bluray gives a bad experience, because they fucked up the 5.1 audio.

So what did the pirates do? Combined the Bluray video with the better DVD 5.1 audio! Best of both worlds.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

You shoukd consider cancelling prime, bezos doesn't need more moneys ^^

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

SG1 was shot in 4:3 until like season 8 or so.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

SG-1 was shot in widescreen from day one, on cameras that had framing marks for 4:3 and 16:9. A 4:3 cut was sent to TV networks and a 16:9 cut was canned until the show was released on DVD.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

SG1 was shot in film and mastered in 16:9. 16mm in the first 3 seasons, 35mm 3-7, and then they moved to digital HD cameras season 8 onwards.

Many shows from the 90s were [edit: shot on film]. That's why you can get a widescreen HD release of Seinfeld, among others.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

That's not always a good thing. If it was meant to be 4:3 the extra space on the frame can have set rigging, lights, microphone booms, and in case of stunts even crash pads.

It's one of the reasons the HD rescan of Buffy:TVS sucks. That still needs a proper 4:3 HD remaster.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Stargate was 4:3, so there's that....

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

i've watched more than a few shows that have been brutally hacked into wide format from the original 4:3. the practice is horrible. they need to stop pulling that shit and let the viewer decide whether to crop the frame or not--or put a proper pan & scan up instead of a blind hack job and leave the original format available, too.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Yeah I really doubt streaming would change anything to 4:3.

Disney+ famously changed classic Simpsons to 16:9 and in the process, cropped enough to make some visual gags not work, but I can't imagine them preferring 4:3 over 16:9.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's what I'm watching right now too! I rewatch every year or two.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Such a great universe! :)

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

Hard to tell a difference on my phone, so I'm assuming most people won't care.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Maybe I'm blind, maybe it's me viewing this on a phone, but I legitimately can't tell the difference.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Zoom in on the guy’s face. The one on the right is crystal clear in comparison to the left.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

If you're using an app, you may need to adjust image quality in the settings. I thought the same thing until I tapped the HD button in Boost.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I can see the difference around the actor's skin and the environment, its less fuzzy. It's hard to tell the difference, definitely. It's compression quality.

What you have to understand about lossy compression is:

  • it throws out data you won't be able to perceive in ideal conditions (color ranges)
  • it throws out data that doesn't change between frames
[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

I peeled my eyes off and i can’t see the nuance either

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The tradeoff kinda made sense at the dawn of streaming, when the transaction was basically trading quality for better pricing and convenience.

Nowadays? Yeaaaaah I don't know about that chief

Crazy to think that we lost all the advantages that streaming offered, kept all the disadvantages, piled on a few more disadvantages on top of that, and people went "sure that makes sense 24 bucks a month worth it bro"

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

All these companies play the frogs in a pot game. Slowly make things shittier and shittier in tiny increments and everyone's sitting there in boiling water eventually like "this is fine." I mean there's still people with cable TV in 2024. And Netflix has done nothing but get worse for the last 3-4 years and their subscriber count just had a decent boost last year so they were like "lol sweet, we're canceling basic ad free tier in 2024, eat shit"

It's felt pretty damn nice to finally give all these companies the boot. They got too greedy. But there'll still be hordes of people just happily paying an ever rising price for this stuff I guess.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Most people would not be able to discern the difference between the top 2 images. Chroma subsampling? Aliasing? Bitrate? These are words that we understand but your average TV watcher has never heard uttered.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

I hate that i have to agree with you.

Last time my wife was watching a movie. It was a local file, and when i walked by, i saw that it was at max 720p and a bit choppy. I remarked that she should tell me which movie it was so i can replace it.

She asked "why would you?" - and i know that her eyes are in perfect shape. She simply does not recognize it when a video plays at crap quality, and she would have to search hard in the above pictures, while i saw the difference in an instant.

She hates ads just like me tho, so a pirates life it is for her :-)

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Even understanding all this, a 2 hour movie in a 2.5gb hevc file is still a very tempting thing. Every movie I could ever want, at acceptable quality, all in under 8tb of space is really amazing.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

You don't need to be an expert to say "that's blurry and looks like shit in comparison".

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

streaming just has godawful UX now as well. the apps play you commercials while in the menu, you have to worry about buffering, you aren't allowed to take screenshots (which is the most numbskulled DRM i've ever seen; they allowed it in the old days and everything was fine AND either way people have ALREADY managed to rip and share the raw footage. what's the point??), 75% of the fucking content on amazon you have to pay an extra fee for, media appears and disappears at the whim of pigheaded suits, prices go up every 6 months because fuck you, the blindingly stupid netflix 'single family home' restriction....

watching tv is meant to be fun, not introduce a whole other layer of bureaucratic bullshit into our lives

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Honestly, the netflix "single family home" thing isn't as bad as I first imagined. I still share my account and we never have any problems.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

That means you're not yet being affected by it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

It's wider?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Both look like shit imo

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, if the streaming providers ever switch over to AV1 that would be an interesting comparison.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

AV1? that's a codec, right? I see in the preferences section for Piped. Is better than AVC (h.2640)?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's also better than H.265/HEVC. Plus, it's open-source and royalty free.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Better quality per file size than HEVC? cite?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I was curious, so I looked it up. AV1 is more efficient than HEVC by like 28%! On the downside, encoding is horrifically slooow. It'll be interesting to see how much hardware support AV1 gets in the coming years, because encoding time will have a dramatic effect on its adoption rate.

Interesting to note: AV1 can be played in Kodi, Plex, Emby, Jellyfin, VLC, Chrome, Firefox, Edge, and Opera. So on the software side, it's pretty widely supported.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

As long as your cpu/gpu can handle it

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Yes, AV1 is the next big deal. You can compress the hell out of the video and it still looks near original. I've re-encode some of my locally ripped movies for fun to see how it looks and it's really impressive.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I wonder if it's possible to re-encode from H.265/HEVC to AV1

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You can play in handbrake with AV1 encoding to see how it goes. I think I set the compression to 36 or something.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Thanks I will give it a shot and see how it goes. The biggest thing holding me back is older hardware like the Nvidia Shield for example not supporting AV1.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Ahh, yeah that could be an issue. It takes my laptop like 11 hours to encode one of the Lord of the Rings Blu-ray. I also change the audio to eAC3 while I'm in there for better client support.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Can you tell me more about reencoding to save space?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago

If you reencode to a more efficient codec, you can save ridiculous amounts of space. If you're interested in reencoding and are willing to play with self hosting, look into Tdarr, it's an app that can reencode your whole library. Been using it for a while after switching from my personal solution has been wonderful. I just put files into my media directories and it picks it up, reencodes the file and replaces the original if everything checks out.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Depends where you get your alternatively-sourced shows from. Downloaded a torrent yesterday that was so dark that I could barely see anything even with my screen's brightness turned all the way up. Downloaded another torrent of the same episode, and it was much easier to see everything.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Call me a loser for this one but I use the Pirate Bay for my high seas sailing. If there's better avenues I would love to see it.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

It’s not so much about where you find the download, but more about which person or group encoded it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Sorry for the long comment incoming . I went into detail with a lot of things.

The one I use costs a little bit of money and may be a little time-consuming to setup depending on the device, but it costs less than most streaming services these days, and you only need to pay for one of it (versus multiple streaming services).

It's called Kodi. The program itself is free, and it technically doesn't support piracy or torrents, but it does support 3rd party add-ons and 3rd-party repositories.

Here's how it works:

  1. Install Kodi on your platform of choice. It supports Windows, Android (including phones, Fire TV, and Android TV), iOS, and Mac. The steps should be about the same regardless of the platform.

  2. Sign up for a "debrid" service and subscribe. This will affect what torrents will be available for a show or movie, so choose wisely. (I personally use Real-Debrid..)

  3. Sign up for a VPN* and subscribe. (I use ProtonVPN.) Depending on where you live, some Internet Service Providers (the company you pay for Internet service) may not like you using a debrid site since it allows for very high-speed downloads, and it's generally a good idea to use a VPN anyway. Install the VPN onto the same device you installed Kodi on.

  4. Use Google to find an add-on you want to install. Many add-ons cater to different wants. For example, some cater sports, others to anime, and some to live action shows. This site has a good list of available add-ons.

  5. Start Kodi. Use this guide to install the add-on of your choice.

  6. Once the add-on is installed, start it and go to its settings. Most of them should have a section called "Accounts" or "Your Accounts" somewhere in there. In there, you should find the option to add or authorize the debrid service you subscribed to. (If it's not there, it's not supported. This is another reason to choose a good one and another reason I recommend Real-Debrid.) Follow the onscreen instructions to connect the add-on to your debrid account.

  7. Turn on your VPN. Find a show you want to watch, pick a cached torrent when/ if it asks, and enjoy. You may need to adjust your audio language and subtitle settings. If you want to choose a specific torrent, you can do so by right-clicking (on PC) or holding down the OK button (on TV) and selecting the option. It might say something about "rescraping providers".

*Many debrid providers automotive or manually whitelist certain VPNs. Whatever VPN you sign up for should be compatible with the debrid service you chose. Some sites (like Real-Debrid), will list the VPNs they're compatible with, while others (like AllDebrid, another debrid service) will simply have you submit your VPN's IP address for manual approval.

I realize this might seem complicated, but I think the payoff is worth it. I pay under $15 (less than $5 for Real-Debrid and $9.99 for ProtonVPN per month) for access to a TON of TV shows and movies, including shows on several different streaming services. And it costs less than most streaming services do these days.

Some add-ons also support Real-Debrid's cloud functionality. Basically, Real-Debrid has the ability to download torrents on its own, and it stores them so you can download them to a storage device later if you want to. For example, you can use this if you have a long car or train ride ahead, and you need to bring some entertainment. Some Kodi add-ons can take advantage of this. They'll send the magnet link (torrent) to your Real-Debrid account, and it'll be available for you to download later. If it's a cached torrent, it'll be available immediately. If it's uncached, Real-Debrid will begin working on downloading it. I'd recommend using a VPN whenever downloading directly from a debrid service so your ISP doesn't complain to you. Anyway, I've put that to pretty good use myself. I watched an episode of the new Percy Jackson TV show recently on a train ride by downloading it beforehand via Kodi and Real-Debrid. I also got most of the episodes of an old anime I used to watch that way, too.