this post was submitted on 04 Feb 2024
146 points (100.0% liked)

politics

22786 readers
3084 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The President has captured over 96% of the vote with most of the ballots in and reported.

all 37 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] anon6789@lemmy.world 28 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I feel a smidge bad for Phillips. Very successful businessman and an actual politician, but can't even beat Williamson.

He's one of the richest congressmen though, so I think he'll be ok.

[–] Zaktor@sopuli.xyz 38 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Nah, if he feels bad it's a good thing. Just the worst sort of Democrat who happens to be right that Biden is too damn old, but has no other redeeming qualities.

https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2024-01-22/dean-phillips-defends-dei-change-on-website-after-ackman-support

[–] anon6789@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

Eww, weak. Thanks for pointing this out.

[–] hglman@lemmy.ml 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Im not sure you need to feel bad for very wealthy people

[–] anon6789@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Wealth isn't a disqualifier to being a good person.

There seems to be some things we could examine about his character, as another commenter pointed out, but whether someone has money or not has nothing to do with my opinion on people.

I just felt it would be frustrating to be an actual politician and getting less votes than a guru.

[–] Tremble@sh.itjust.works 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Unfortunately, it kind of is in general.

Rich people are generally assholes

https://www.vox.com/2015/6/16/8790357/rich-people-jerks

[–] doctorcrimson@lemmy.today 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

A good businessman is a terrible politician.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That depends on whether you think a good businessman is someone that can cut costs and increase results or someone that can generate profit.

[–] doctorcrimson@lemmy.today 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Cut costs and increase results like those politicians who made concrete and rebar standard materials for bridges? The bridges that are now in disrepair all over the USA due to the short lifespan of the product? Nah, screw that.

If they've got a law degree, sure. They're an artist? Absolutely. Engineers? Fuck Yeah! They've got degrees in statistics and finance? BANGER. They're a "Businessman?" NEED NOT APPLY.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I don't think it's the fault of the designer or original leadership that the people that followed them didn't actually do what they were supposed to...

You could build a bridge that will last fifty years with no maintenance, or 100 years with proper maintenance, is it a bad bridge because in seventy years with no maintenance it's falling apart?

Or is it just that your successors didn't do their jobs, aka, get results?

[–] doctorcrimson@lemmy.today 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Concrete and Rebar fails in less than 20 years because the cheapest most widely available rebar is iron, which rusts rapidly once the surface of the concrete cracks.

[–] DragonTypeWyvern@literature.cafe 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Idk who's telling you this but they're lying, probably because they're skimming the maintenance budget and then gaslighting you about why it's falling apart.

[–] doctorcrimson@lemmy.today 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The only way to maintain those structures are to rebuild them in segments, which is admittedly easy to do but in turn raises the cost over time.

You mean like something they would create a maintenance budget for and say "do this at these periods and it will be cost effective?"

[–] Witchfire@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] return2ozma@lemmy.world 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

For the record, there's 3,200,000 registered voters in South Carolina. Biden won with 116,266 votes tonight. He received 540,000 votes in 2020.

[–] doctorcrimson@lemmy.today 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I doubt most of them even knew the primaries had already begun. My state's primaries are in a couple of months.

[–] TheMinions@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Most of us (even democrats) want to go vote in the Republican Caucasus in a few weeks. That’s what my family is planning on doing anyway. Voting in this primary is a waste of time, because Biden is going to get the DNC nomination, there is basically no point in voting right now.

Down the line, yes there is still a point voting in November, since we’ll be able to vote for local officials as well, even if SC will just vote into red for the 40th year in a row or whatever the actual stat is.

You should be aware that trying to poison the well like that is generally counterproductive.

The parties don't see "oh, secret Dems are trying to get a candidate they can stomach" they see "90% of the voters are registered as the other guys, don't bother"

[–] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

262k in the 2020 primary, which is probably the most analogous comparison to the 116k.