this post was submitted on 11 Feb 2024
100 points (100.0% liked)

Games

18400 readers
979 users here now

Video game news oriented community. No NanoUFO is not a bot :)

Posts.

  1. News oriented content (general reviews, previews or retrospectives allowed).
  2. Broad discussion posts (preferably not only about a specific game).
  3. No humor/memes etc..
  4. No affiliate links
  5. No advertising.
  6. No clickbait, editorialized, sensational titles. State the game in question in the title. No all caps.
  7. No self promotion.
  8. No duplicate posts, newer post will be deleted unless there is more discussion in one of the posts.
  9. No politics.

Comments.

  1. No personal attacks.
  2. Obey instance rules.
  3. No low effort comments(one or two words, emoji etc..)
  4. Please use spoiler tags for spoilers.

My goal is just to have a community where people can go and see what new game news is out for the day and comment on it.

Other communities:

Beehaw.org gaming

Lemmy.ml gaming

lemmy.ca pcgaming

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ampersandrew@kbin.social 133 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Yeah, you're prone to having one of the biggest drops when you've got one of the biggest peaks. What a garbage article.

Palworld’s next update and early access roadmap are already on the cards, so it’s now up to Pocketpair to keep supporting the game and listening to players to keep them hooked.

NO IT'S NOT. The only thing it's on them to do is to finish it. They sell the game for $30, and this is not a live service game. They don't need to keep anyone hooked.

[–] lordnikon@lemmy.world 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

not to speak for anyone what they ment but I took hooked the saw way I see satisfactory. keeping engment high by taking in feedback to make a really good end product. not use exploitive tricks to get people addicted to something that is not fun.

[–] ampersandrew@kbin.social 30 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's hard for me to take it that way when the author is citing player count numbers in the headline as though that matters at all in a game with finite content and a low cost of entry. Even you using the word "engagement" in what's meant to be an innocent way just has me thinking about how live service games have poisoned the way people speak and think about video games.

[–] lordnikon@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

your statement about live service poisoning the way people talk about game updates we can both agree on that.

[–] fishos@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I mean, as it stands now, there's no gameplay other than "build up base", "collect all monsters" and "level up". End game is non-existent. It needs something more or it absolutely will die. There's been a million open world survival games that have come and gone for the same reason. This very well could just be a flash in the pan, largely held up by hype more than anything.

[–] ampersandrew@kbin.social 17 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I can't think of a game that I've played and enjoyed that had an "end game" except rolling credits, and that's totally fine. Flashes in the pan are totally fine. The game can't "die" as long as a single person wants to play it, because it's playable regardless of the presence of the company's servers.

[–] fishos@lemmy.world 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

OMG, stfu. No one is talking about "you're still alive as long as someone remembers your name" type bullshit. We mean an active and engaged player base. That's what a games "death" refers to. You are being incredibly obtuse.

[–] ampersandrew@kbin.social 20 points 1 year ago

Who cares if there's a huge player base a year from now? Really? This isn't "you're still alive as long as someone remembers your name", this is the game literally still exists and can be played. To play multiplayer, ping your friend on Discord and host it yourself, even if that's thirty years from now, but good luck doing that with The Finals or something. That game really will be dead in 30 years (maybe even 1 year). If Palworld's population is in single digits a year from now, they're still filthy rich, and people who bought the game still have access to it whenever they want. Nothing about the game is worse off for the population not being in the millions anymore.

[–] Pepsi@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

why does an “active and engaged player base” matter at all? you can host a personal/local dedicated server, so no worries about them shutting the servers off. the game has no larger community interactions beyond what happens on a server. there’s not even pvp that would suffer from a diminished player base.

do you, like, only play games that other people think are cool?

[–] loobkoob@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I can definitely think of quite a few non-live-service games with an "end game" that I've enjoyed:

  • (Older) Pokémon games with their battle towers, where putting together a flexible team with as few weaknesses as possible is the aim.
  • Loot games like Borderlands, Grim Dawn and Last Epoch where I want to make new builds and test their limits against harder and harder challenges.
  • Factorio, where I want to optimise my factory. Although there's absolutely an argument to be made that that is the game, but I think it becomes more about player-set goals once you've launched the rocket.

All of them are either offline or have offline modes available. All of them have potentially infinite "content" if you're the sort of person who like optimising, or just being able to set yourself new targets. They're all enjoyable to play for their "campaigns" alone, but they also have very strong sandboxes that players can continue to engage with even after the game stops giving them objectives.

I don't necessarily disagree with your overall sentiment, though. I think MMO-style "end games" where you login for your daily, time-gated quests and do the same thing you always do with no variation or sense of progression (be it narrative, emotional, build-related or some other kind of progression) isn't necessarily healthy. And I dislike the way "end games" have tended to move away from being optional post-game content for people who aren't ready to finish playing yet and instead are often viewed as the main game that you have to get through the sorry excuse for a campaign/story to access.

[–] ampersandrew@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Factorio is definitely the one I had in mind, especially since it's the game I've played most similar to Palworld, and that game is over for me once I've launched the rocket. I did do that twice though, with two very different factory designs. If I'm not compelled to play Palworld two different ways, I'll still have gotten my money's worth.

[–] loobkoob@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

that game is over for me once I've launched the rocket

Ahh, well that definitely isn't the case for me! I usually keep playing long after I've launched the first rocket. For me, launching the rocket is a somewhat arbitrary "ending"; it's a good objective for people to focus on - especially new players - but I don't think anything really changes before or after the rocket launch in terms of gameplay loop (and there's no narrative to change). Just like before the rocket launch, there are still things to optimise, new ways to build, etc, (some of which are supported by the science you get from launching rockets, in fact).

I suppose it partially comes down to whether you're an objective-driven player or someone who enjoys the process. For me, it's all about the process/journey, and the objectives are more of a guide than anything. If the objectives are complete and I'm still enjoying the process, and there's still room for me to enjoy the process, then I'll keep playing.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Kaldo@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago

You are right, but is it any different for games like Ark, Conan, VRising, Rust or any other sandbox builder focused on multiplayer? It's always just a farm-build-collect-repeat cycle. It's why I get bored of them easily at least, the only games in that genre that can usually keep my attention are Factorio and Valheim.

[–] Xanis@lemmy.world 53 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Gotta say, this one's preeetty simple:

Game comes out

People play game

People play game a lot

Content runs out

People leave

Time passes poof! more content

People come back

Games usually have a pretty finite lifespan unless and usually only when built from the beginning to maintain playerbase.

[–] Renacles@lemmy.world 51 points 1 year ago (1 children)

So a lot of people finished the game and are now playing something else.

It's a real shocker, I guess that means that this game without MTX or subscription service is dead. /s

[–] EatATaco@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

There is nothing in the article about the game being dead, in fact it says it explicitly assumes that it will have respectable numbers once the dust settles.

It's like you made up a reason why the article is wrong about something that it didnt even claim.

[–] FenrirIII@lemmy.world 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You missed the '/s' for sarcasm, didn't you?

[–] EatATaco@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's absolutely 100% part of the reason why I interpreted it the way it was meant to be interpreted.

[–] Sethayy@sh.itjust.works 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The best part of interpretation is how objective it is eh?

/s

[–] EatATaco@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I cant believe people are actually arguing that the top level poster wasn't implying that this article is claiming that palworld failing.

[–] Pepsi@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

i can’t believe it matters this much to you

[–] EatATaco@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I would rather something matter too much to me than be dishonest.

[–] Pepsi@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

🙄

Weird to get self-righteous about your inability to understand clear sarcasm

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] TIMMAY@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago

🤦‍♂️

[–] PenguinTD@lemmy.ca 50 points 1 year ago

it's viral game what do you expect?

[–] CluckN@lemmy.world 32 points 1 year ago (1 children)

On Saturday, January 27 Palworld peaked at 2,101,867 concurrents, and now on Saturday, February 10, it has 757,508 according to data from SteamDB

Let’s compare that to a recently released AAA game.

Suicide Squad Kill The Justice League has 2,422 concurrent players, while Rocksteady's predecessor Batman Arkham Knight has 2,654 players,

[–] spez_@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

Do a proper comparison

[–] Stern@lemmy.world 30 points 1 year ago

Game of the week is game of the week. Fall Guys, Dave the Diver, and Among Us unavailable for comment.

[–] Neato@ttrpg.network 14 points 1 year ago

I'd be interested with more content in the early to middle game. More things in the world as well. It feels very empty at times.

[–] Fades@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago

How utterly predictable

[–] Melkath@kbin.social 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Makes sense.

The beginning is fun and really just sucks the life out of you as your are flooded with new mechanics and npcs.

Then the game very quickly shows itself for what it is, an open world game.

It's a glorious grindy repetitive complicated open world game that doesn't hold your hand.

I knew I was in love the moment I started compiling my pal attribute database. 90% of gamers dont like that kind of stuff. They just want to be lead from A to Z.

[–] Leate_Wonceslace@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think it's fun, actually. If the game never updates again I'll be disappointed that it never became what it could have been but I won't regret buying it or spending time playing with my friends.

[–] Zahille7@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Personally I kinda hope it turns even more into Ark. Maybe we could get other big maps in future updates that could act as different "regions" like in Pokemon. It already kinda works like that in the game, but they could introduce new pals that you can only find in certain spots on the new map.

And of course the rest of the story with the crazy world tree and ancient civilization.

I want fewer Ark features, actually. I don't like the way tech scales or how it's unlocked by leveling up.

[–] glimse@lemmy.world 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The beginning is fun and really just sucks the life out of you as your are flooded with new mechanics

Uhh are we playing the same game? What new mechanics get introduced that you don't have by level 10?

[–] Melkath@kbin.social 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

... All of the mechanics of the game.

"The beginning..."

[–] glimse@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I mean I don't see what mechanics you could possibly be overwhelmed by. I'm enjoying it but I think it's biggest flaw is that it's TOO simple

If you feel underwater with 10 mechanics total, there's not many games you can play. The building is basic, the crafting is extremely straight forward, and fighting consists of run, shoot, and roll.

[–] Melkath@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Again, didnt say overwhelmed or drowning.

Said sucked the life out of me. Had me engrossed. My first sit down was 4 hours that felt like 5 minutes.

Edit: Cheeky, but I gotta sat it... people who are taking "sucked the life out of me" as a negative statement have never enjoyed a blowjob. At least not a good one.

[–] Zahille7@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Maybe pick something else to say in the future so people won't be confused? Usually "sucked the life out of me" is used for when people feel negatively exhausted after something.

I played literally all night when I first started, I didn't want to stop even when I noticed the sun was up.

[–] Melkath@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

I guess that is where the confusion is.

I didn't mean it in a negative way.

Literally said I love the game.

[–] gibmiser@lemmy.world 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] CorrodedCranium@leminal.space 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I mean that's modern trends for you.

[–] CorrodedCranium@leminal.space 4 points 1 year ago

I don't think this should surprise anyone

No surprise lol

load more comments