this post was submitted on 20 Feb 2024
126 points (100.0% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

62220 readers
296 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):

🏴‍☠️ Other communities

FUCK ADOBE!

Torrenting/P2P:

Gaming:


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

One thing that leaps out at me about this ruling is that courts understand the internet a lot better nowadays. A decade or so ago Sony would have probably gotten away with the argument that Cox profited from the users' piracy; nowadays judges themselves use the internet and are going to go "lolno, they probably would have been Cox customers anyway. It's not like anyone pays for internet connection solely to pirate. And in most areas people don't even have a choice of provider, so how is Cox profiting from this?"

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 64 points 1 year ago (1 children)

When will Sony be sued for stealing their customer's legally purchased digital media

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Too long. I hope on Feb 30

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Oh that's very soon then! :D

[–] [email protected] 37 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Internet is a utility and should be treated as such.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Up next Sony sues Pacific Gas & Electric for profiting off of piracy. All those torrents were powered by Pacific Gas & Electric.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Sues corning for making all that glass that transmitted the piracy.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

If you were a true american you'd be for privatization of all utilties

/s

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Ain't nobody going to talk about that guy in the thumbnail eating a CD while wearing that hat? Stock photos are weird.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That’s how true hackers read the data without a cd-rom drive.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

i thought he was munching it into shape so it would fit the floppy drive.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Create a Lemmy version! Be the change you want to see.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Stop copying my comments ;D

But actually: I don't want to mod it :/

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

That's okay, you can create subs and not mod them. Lemmy has a sort-of-mechanism to transfer modship already.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (41 children)

Don't believe that you're always gonna be protected by some judge somewhere.

Get a proper VPN, dammit!

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

In the end, you can't out-tech the law. You need rights.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Your so-called "rights" won't hold to the pressure of massive media capital alone. It will erode away.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I just wish they would advertise the truth. VPN's are basically useless nowadays for everything except torrenting. Most websites once they detect a VPN address will just shut down. Go ahead and give Imgur a try with it turned on to see what I mean.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I use a VPN constantly and sadly a lot of sites add known VPN ip's to a ban list, I just reconnect my VPN and usually I get a good address but yea it sucks

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Change your server to another location. ISP blocks VPN addresses that have been tagged.

load more comments (39 replies)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Media Corporations should not have a say in disconnecting users from the internet based on copyright infringement. The right to social participation is part of a basic human right - self-determination. Today, the majority of interactions with society involve communication via internet in one way or another, so that access to the internet is vital for enabling social participation.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah, it's somehow comparable to a scenario where they had the power to decide you can't use uber/taxi, or postal services, because you used it to transport the HDD you're using for your private collection of copyright-protected media.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

You're right, but looking at this analogy backwards tells us the problem isn't the ability for Uber/ISPs to ban users--this happens and isn't a problem with Uber-- it's that Uber, unlike ISPs, doesn't hold a monopoly on feasible means of transportation. We can't reasonably expect a business to act outside its own best interests, so it's insane to allow a business to exist in such a form. Short term, sure, regulate; but really, nationalize it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

1 billion dollars over pirated music? Who pirates music amymore

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Billion? What are they smoking???

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ikr? It's like they're counting every act of digital piracy ever to be their lost profits when that's obviously not the case.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

It's not "like", that has been the argument with these piracy cases for ages. If I pirate 100 movies, it obviously means that if I couldn't have I would have gone to the shop to buy each and every one of them. It's even worse for anyone caught distributing the downloads, where a site host can be hit with this logic for every user download ever.

Apparently these days they are claiming that movie and TV piracy costs the US film industry $29-71 billion a year and the US GDP a cool $115 billion in total
Because, you know, we have all that money just floating in our pockets now thanks to piracy.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Video game piracy has led to more purchases from me, because I'll download a game to try on a whim that I wouldn't have purchased, find out that's it really good and buy it

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

It has been shown that pirates spend more on media than anyone else, so companies are effectively attacking their best customers because they are short sighted idiots

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

Spoons made me fat!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I live in Brazil, there are many problems here and stuff. But at least no one gives a fuck about piracy, lol. Never needed a VPN for torrents, not gonna need anytime soon.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

If I'm not mistaken, Brazilian law allows people to download and make digital copies of copyrighted material, so long as it's for personal use. I should probably look into that sometime

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

It's like that in many countries. The USA is just kind of shit in this regard.

load more comments
view more: next ›