this post was submitted on 09 Mar 2024
990 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

68066 readers
3717 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 222 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You’re telling me the company that once had ads for T-Mobile and Volkswagen and now almost exclusively has ads where random bots with NFT photos advertise ChatGPT ‘services’ isn’t doing well financially??

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago (6 children)

It's important to note that "doing well financially" isn't just revenue and user count, it's also expenditures. If Twitter has managed to cut costs by more than whatever its income has dropped by then that could well be a good outcome for it, I've heard it wasn't profitable when Musk took it over.

It's kind of ironic how big companies are frequently criticized for fixating on "endless growth" and "line goes up", and then when a company or organization sheds that it also looks bad.

[–] [email protected] 42 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

There's so much wrong with your understanding here...so I'll just point out that you're talking about Twitter as if it's still a public company, it's not.

Also, Twitter was never profitable, and it was likely never going to be profitable. But there's a big difference between their losses and projections before Musk, and after.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 183 points 1 year ago (8 children)

What the fuck is the other 70%'s problem?

[–] [email protected] 88 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 83 points 1 year ago (3 children)
[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 year ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 48 points 1 year ago (2 children)

He kept the 70% he wanted, it'll be a propaganda engine and communications platform for the right wing.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago

I have a lot of friends that won’t quit because of sports updates and all the shitposts

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago

This is in addition to the first year of losses, which are likely higher.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 133 points 1 year ago (6 children)

How much did human usage drop? Because there are a shitload more bots on twitter nowadays than there were in the years before he took over.

[–] [email protected] 48 points 1 year ago (2 children)

This should be human usage - the user survey was done by phone.

[–] [email protected] 39 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Ah, ok, 27% -> 19%, an 8% YoY drop, and the numbers were obtained using identical methodologies across multiple years. Yeah, I agree, seems to check out.

Still, there are definitely a shitload more bots than there were before.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

Any time something gets too big it gets bots. Lemmy will be the same. We will see instances getting defederated who cannot manage the spam.

Fuck Elon though

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 93 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Ever since Musk's control of the company, Twitter (I refused to call it X) showed me multiple hate and racists posts. Basically, Twitter is showing me garbage. I now use Mastadon instead.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

I was never active in terms of posting but I followed several news outlets, local government agencies, and a few friends. Shortly after Musk took over I saw nothing but right wing nutjobs and a lot of posts from Musk. I tried unfollowing but nothing worked so I quit logging in. I need to cancel my account but haven't taken the time.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Facebook does that for me too, alongside flat earthers, anti EV crap and the occasional funny picture. It's depressing.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 58 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (16 children)

I'm back to calling it Twitter. (Not that I'm ever on it though.)

[–] [email protected] 45 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's such a stupid name! Everytime it's mentioned, it has to be prepend or suffixed with something so people actually understand the "X" context.

And more importantly - If you visit x.com, it redirects to twitter.com! So what's the fucking point of the rebrand?

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago

Genius, i say! The man’s an absolute genius!

Obviously. Some people say trump should run a social media platform. More and more.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Until he stops allowing deadnaming on his site, I'm going to deadname his site.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago

Xitter, but the X makes a ‘sh’ sound.

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] [email protected] 54 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Good, but not good enough. It needs to be 0. And if you’re still on that shithole of a propaganda spreading platform- you’re supporting it.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

i heard there's good porn on there, probably why some decided to stick around

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 53 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Needing to log in to view someones tweets means now I wont even visit the site when linked. Kinda the number 1 rule of platforms is to make them accessible to those that don't already use it, so as to convert them later. Musk, and everyone around him letting these decisions run through, are idiots

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

ran into this last night.

I hate twitter, but there was something I was trying to see and the only way to get the info was from a twitter post. Couldnt view the goddamn twitter post without creating an account and logging in.

My immediate thought was "This isnt important enough for this bullshit" and immediately gave up.

I'm convinced this login to view shit is to hide the explosion of right wing white supremacy/racism/etc posts and the bots echoing and amplifying it from people before they commit themselves to an account.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 52 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I wrote this right as the first elon buying Twitter mentions were popping up...

Notably, Twitter facilitated communication during the arab spring, where the people organized to stand against and even overthrow several broken and corrupt government regimes throughout the middle east - including some participation in places like Saudi Arabia, for example.

Twitter's second largest investor after a musk takeover... the kingdom of Saudi Arabia and it's de facto leader who, among other things, killed and dismembered an American journalist without consequence somewhat recently.

And now Twitter is about to be killed... and dismembered.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago

Yep, Saudi Arabia bought that service and the price, giving a man child a toy that it would probably ruin quickly, looked rather attractive.

[–] [email protected] 42 points 1 year ago (7 children)
[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 year ago (1 children)

X is one of his older websites, a financial platform that he created after his first startup was sold. Name comes from "X marks the spot" from old treasure maps, was to be the place for all transactions.

It struggled and didn't really get off the ground, but was able to merge with another platform called Confinity, run by Peter Thiel. The merged platforms then became PayPal, and made both guys rich as shit. Thiel eventually power played Musk and got him kicked out of the company, arguably for good reason, though Thiel is quite a piece of work, too.

The new X is Musk's attempt to make twitter more like his old site, and is why he was throwing around things like making it a peer to peer payment site, similar to WeChat / WePay or Venmo. How he plans to make tweets into bank transfers I've got no idea, esp. when losing 30 percent of users.

More on this: https://www.forbes.com/sites/zacharyfolk/2024/01/09/x-announces-peer-to-peer-payment-service-will-launch-in-2024/?sh=62ee775a75a8

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 year ago (1 children)

An obsolete windowing system for UNIX like operating systems

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago

obsolete? say that after trying wayland on an nvidia card.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's his favorite letter or something. He'd wanted to name something X for a while. The closest he got before was SpaceX. Which I suppose now retroactively means SpaceTwitter.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 39 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 year ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I’m sure a lot of the original population has dropped by a lot more than that, but in numbers they would have been replaced by an influx of fascists and bots.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 34 points 1 year ago

How could the jews do this to me :(

-Musk

[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 year ago

That sounds like bragging. Why aren't more people stopping this crap?

[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Who the fuck is still on that shitpile? Dudes. Stahp.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I deleted my account and haven't missed it at all. Then again I was never good at making use of Twitter, it's too hectic and disorganized for me, and I have the same problem with mastodon.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 year ago

Oh you mean Twitter?

Yeah, ‘X’ is never gonna happen.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)

How do you measure the percentage of people who never used it and are now saying "Oh hell no, not ever!"?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago (6 children)

I'm part of the 70%.

I use it exclusively for gay furry porn.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Doesn't surprise me. Musk has cultivated and emboldened racists, homophobes, cryptobros, misogynists, and the far right and the platform has turned into a cesspit. Meanwhile scammers & bots run rampant and the blueticks stink up every thread with cretinous remarks and trolling.

I wouldn't be surprised if a lot of people have just given up with it, or moved to another social media that isn't so toxic.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I've been using Bluesky more. It is better with feeds and a way less toxic general user base.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago
load more comments
view more: next ›