this post was submitted on 15 Mar 2024
438 points (100.0% liked)

Funny: Home of the Haha

6858 readers
108 users here now

Welcome to /c/funny, a place for all your humorous and amusing content.

Looking for mods! Send an application to Stamets!

Our Rules:

  1. Keep it civil. We're all people here. Be respectful to one another.

  2. No sexism, racism, homophobia, transphobia or any other flavor of bigotry. I should not need to explain this one.

  3. Try not to repost anything posted within the past month. Beyond that, go for it. Not everyone is on every site all the time.


Other Communities:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] circuitfarmer@lemmy.world 91 points 1 year ago (4 children)

I not only remember the cornucopia one, but I thought this was the reason I learned the word cornucopia when I was a kid. Most Mandela effect stuff is kind of silly to me, but this one just freaks me out.

[–] Moneo@lemmy.world 31 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You probably learned cornucopia from thanksgiving, that's how I learned it. Also, google cornucopia and basically every image looks like the fruit of the loom logo but with the horn behind it. It's pretty obvious that people are so used to seeing the cornucopia imagery that when it's combined with the fruit of the loom logo their brains go "yeah that looks right" and just assume that it must've been that at some point.

Mandela effects are fun and I understand the appeal but anyone who takes them seriously is straight up just not using their critical thinking skills.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] voracitude@lemmy.world 88 points 1 year ago (4 children)

The wicker conch was there when I was a kid, 100%, but maybe it was regional?

Or maybe they realised getting rid of the conch would save them a million dollars in printing costs over five years (or whatever) and quietly removed it?

[–] karashta@kbin.melroy.org 92 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Just so you know, that brown thing is called a cornucopia! Literally "horn of abundance" in Latin.

[–] aeronmelon@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Growing up, I always referred to it, and always heard it referred to as, a horn o' plenty.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Your mom referred to something else as the horn o'plenty..

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] MasterNerd@lemm.ee 22 points 1 year ago (7 children)
[–] snooggums@midwest.social 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

This one is the perfect example because I also remember it having the cornucopia despite it never being there in the official product. I would bet that the memory comes from the brain mashing together similar looking artwork from Thanksgiving.

Note: a memory is still a memory even if it isn't accurate, because memories aren't perfect.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 14 points 1 year ago

Or it wasn't and you're just mistaken. You can find vintage underwear and t shirts on ebay from fotl back in the 70's and 80's right now. It isn't there. Also, snopes.com deemed it false.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] zerodawn@leaf.dance 79 points 1 year ago (12 children)

I'll apologise now for the tiktok link, i know how much this place hates tiktok but here is a woman who did a deep dive and found evidence that the company actually changed their logo and tried to scrub the existence of the Cornucopia from the internet to distance themselves from Bad PR.

https://www.tiktok.com/@dimelifting/video/7311071477732838687

[–] atocci@lemmy.world 47 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Not so sure I believe this one. I can't find any evidence that this is real, but I am finding a lot that shows it was never part of the logo. For example, this needle package from 1967 doesn't have one and there isn't a single trademark owned by them, past or present, that has the cornucopia in it.

[–] Obi@sopuli.xyz 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I always thought it must've been common counterfeits that added it.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] frunch@lemmy.world 39 points 1 year ago (2 children)

So here i am, minding my business on a Friday afternoon and this guy, this guy comes in with a tiktok link! And I'm all like hrrrnnnggggggggggg ehhhhhhhhhhhh but you know what I'll let it slide today. It's nice out, gonna bbq later if it doesn't rain. What the hell, right? You go ahead and do your tiktoks and if anyone gives you hell about it just remember this guy said he's giving you a pass

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] andros_rex@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

That woman has already been caught spreading fake/photoshopped shit multiple times. The TikTok conspiracy is that it’s a coverup for a chemical spill at a factory that Fruit of the Loom didn’t even own at the time.

Detroit Free Press

[–] Mastengwe@lemm.ee 20 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] SmilingSolaris@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Cause they poisoned a whole town and did a corporate restructuring to be able to deny that they did it. Part of that included deleting the cornucopia

[–] andros_rex@lemmy.world 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

That’s not true. That comes from a TikTok which was complete horseshit. They didn’t own that factory at the time.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] PeriodicallyPedantic@lemmy.ca 18 points 1 year ago (7 children)

They're not, but the old company logo was associated with a scandal/disaster so they changed it to distance themselves.

Idk if I really buy it considering how similar the new logo is, nobody is gonna think it's two different companies. But I haven't fully immersed myself in the conspiracy yet, so I might be missing some context

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] maccentric@sh.itjust.works 20 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I like this idea but it’s hard to believe that nobody can produce a pair of underwear or t-shirt from the 70s that they found in their basement/attic

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] LolaCat@lemmy.ca 74 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (7 children)

I’ve 100% seen the cornucopia version in the past. The only reasonable explanation I can think of is that perhaps people have used the fan-made one without realizing it? It’s a better explanation than parallel universes, at least ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

[–] WoahWoah@lemmy.world 42 points 1 year ago (11 children)

Perhaps the more reasonable explanation is that you're misremembering.

[–] LolaCat@lemmy.ca 43 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Are you suggesting that I'm the one at fault? How preposterous! /s

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] Veedem@lemmy.world 53 points 1 year ago (5 children)

I would swear my undergarments had the cornucopia logo when I was growing up. I actually remember the point in my life where I saw the logo without it and assumed they decided to modernize.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 40 points 1 year ago (5 children)

This is the longest and most confusing Snopes article I have ever read. I feel like the Mandela Effect is clawing at the boundaries of its containment, trying to escape and start to change day-to-day things about my home and the people around me.

[–] BarrelAgedBoredom@lemm.ee 14 points 1 year ago (6 children)

I'm usually one to trust snopes but they're full of shit

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] LemmyKnowsBest@lemmy.world 36 points 1 year ago (2 children)

SAME. I know without a doubt the brown cornucopia was part of the fruit logo.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] yoevli@lemmy.world 36 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (19 children)

This one is freaky, but it just comes from the strong cultural association between imagery of big ol' piles of produce and cornucopias. We expect one to be there so our brain tries to helpfully fill in the "gap" in our memory for us.

[–] wise_pancake@lemmy.ca 33 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

I don't have this one, but I will cut you if you call them The Bearenstain Bears.

I am not crazy! I know they swapped those letters! I learned to read with Bearenstein. I knew it was Bearenstein. One after See Spot Run. As if I could make such a mistake. Never. Never!

[–] buycurious@lemmy.world 48 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)
[–] stephen01king@lemmy.zip 16 points 1 year ago (2 children)

But doesn't the front on both says Berenstain in cursive or am I reading it wrong?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Bunnylux@lemmy.world 25 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It's neither of those. You're putting "bear" into it. Lmao. It's Berenstain.

[–] audiomodder@lemmy.blahaj.zone 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You’re wrong too. It’s the Bearenstain Bares, because it was a book about nudists.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] wise_pancake@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Oh God this is even worse. We've split again!

load more comments (1 replies)

I think a lot of us just mispronounced it. As an American "stain" seems like a lot less common of a name ending than "stein". Easy to gloss over a spelling in a long word.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] EtherWhack@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

With the prevalence of cornucopias used in Thanksgiving artwork and how we (people in the US) were force-fed all of it growing up, I imagine allowed the juxtaposition

[–] RizzRustbolt@lemmy.world 16 points 1 year ago

Chances are, if it's corporate, you're not crazy.

[–] quindraco@lemm.ee 15 points 1 year ago
[–] vox@sopuli.xyz 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

I'm not aware of what fruit of the loom is but tbh i think they should add it, the logo just doesn't look right without it (it's color palette improves the logo and makes it more square-ish)

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments