this post was submitted on 20 Mar 2024
180 points (100.0% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

59827 readers
155 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):

🏴‍☠️ Other communities

Torrenting/P2P:

Gaming:


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 7Sea_Sailor@lemmy.dbzer0.com 50 points 1 year ago (10 children)

Just use yt-dlp instead of relying on websites that shove ads in your face and may do what ever they want to the files you're downloading?

[–] bblfrnz@beehaw.org 37 points 1 year ago (3 children)

The worst ever suggestion and unfortunately the most upvoted. Do not ever download music from youtube, free-mp3-download was a front-end for deezer with flacs and 320 kbps mp3 and music on youtube is only about 160 kbps, that's kinda okay for streaming but absolutely ridiculous if you want to download and keep it.

[–] Scrollone@feddit.it 12 points 1 year ago

You can use yt-dlp to download from other website, not only on YouTube.

[–] lemmyvore@feddit.nl 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

You can tell the difference between 320kbps and 160kbps in a blind test?

If you can tell anything above 160 you're in a select minority (and using great equipment). Most people will never have any use for 320.

[–] sus@programming.dev 6 points 1 year ago

Youtube actually uses 128kbps opus, which should be significantly better than 160kbps mp3

but the real problem is that you can't know what quality the uploader used, it all gets recompressed by youtube.

[–] Ilandar@aussie.zone 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't understand where you guys get these conspiracy theories about the human ear from, you sound like the people who claimed the human eye couldn't see a difference above 60 FPS. It's just obviously wrong. Stop reading studies and telling yourself you can't hear a difference. Use your ears.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Ilandar@aussie.zone 26 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Why do people still download music from YouTube in 2024? The quality is awful and it's not even the easiest method of music piracy.

[–] Sorse@discuss.tchncs.de 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

it's not even the easiest method of music piracy.

What’s easier than pressing 2 buttons in my YouTube app?

The quality is awful

It’s perfectly acceptable for me

[–] Outtatime@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You think YouTube audio is acceptable? Oof...

[–] Sorse@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 1 year ago

Ignorance is bliss

[–] ellabella@beehaw.org 7 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Personally, some of the particular covers sang by Youtubers or certain compilations remind me of specific memories back when I was younger.

Also there's a lot of songs that are not available anywhere else

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] RisingSwell@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 year ago (5 children)

I download it from youtube because that's where I found it, and I'm not entirely sure what's easier than just copying/pasting the link of the page I'm already on. I'm very confident other methods have better quality, but easier is a big statement.

[–] jaykay@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 year ago

Plus, it’s more likely you’ll find music you want on YouTube than Spotify or wherever since the author just needs to upload a video

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Makeshift@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 year ago

Some music I like are fan covers/remixes that may only be on YouTube.

[–] silent_squirrel@feddit.de 18 points 1 year ago

It was possible to download lossless FLAC files (they got them straight from Deezer) though, so higher quality than anything downloaded from Youtube etc.

[–] Amir@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 year ago

YouTube is absolutely unacceptable quality. The difference is clearly audible even on $5 earbuds. I feel sorry for your ears if you don't hear the difference, but the vast majority of those who care enough to download music will be able to tell the difference.

I personally pay for Deezer HiFi and save the FLACs locally. Friends mostly do the same with Tidal, but both work well for this purpose.

If you want to find FLACs without paying for a service you can check out rutracker. It has torrents for discographies from a lot of famous artists. Alternatively, you could find a stolen account for one of the previously mentioned services, but that goes too far for my morals because you're hurting a normal person with a hacked account.

[–] BreakDecks@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Despite all the naysayers in the comments, this is the correct answer. No ad-riddled websites, no weird guis. just "yt-dlp < url of whatever you want to rip >" in bash.

Lots of people responding to this need to acquaint themselves with the raw power of yt-dlp. It isn't just for YouTube. You can rip Deezer and other streaming audio services. You can rip pretty much any video site. It even takes RSS and M3U8 links and will rip live streams.

[–] authed@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

On Android I use Newpipe for downloading audio-only.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] gravitywell@sh.itjust.works 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Deemix works great for flac or 320kbps mp3, it's really easy to get ARI codes for free

[–] hasty3827@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

If you like cli try streamrip on github. Then you can download from deezer, qobuz, or tidal. Like you said, there lots of free arl for those online.

A much simpler solution is using doubledouble for those not as tech savvy.

[–] user224@lemmy.sdf.org 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] JackGreenEarth@lemm.ee 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)
[–] domi@lemmy.secnd.me 12 points 1 year ago

Is that a real Deezloader website? That website looks shady af.

[–] Tenkard@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Deezer sent out a mail that they are closing the free service so it may not work anymore (without a paid Deezer account)

[–] LiveLM@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Subbing for a month, then downloading Gigabytes of properly tagged FLACs doesn't sound too bad tbh

[–] spiderman@ani.social 10 points 1 year ago

This guide is enough for all of your needs.

[–] PoliticallyIncorrect@lemm.ee 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There is a way to download whole playlists in best quality?

[–] NaoPb@eviltoast.org 2 points 1 year ago

I did not know about this one. I was using my free mp3 juices but that seems to have died in the beginning of this year.