this post was submitted on 21 Mar 2024
248 points (100.0% liked)

Facepalm

2965 readers
2 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

For context this is an Andrew tate meatrider on twitter

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 80 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I think the problem here is making rape sound like an opportunist crime: like you left a wallet stuffed full of cash at a bar and someone took it while the owner was getting a drink.

"Well, you were dressed showing too much skin, and you didn't take your knight-in-shining-armour, so what do you expect?

If a person don't see the problem with this view, then there a significant lack of insight. But then that is probably Tates' target audience.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (8 children)

Well, there's also a lot of "extreme" examples. It's always the super slutty, naive woman or the super innocent, risk-free woman. Nothing in between.

There are definitely scenarios, where a reasonable person would have to say "this action is very risk prone". And I personally think it's hypocritical to completely separate rape from any other crime. You can't argue, that in any other crime there's a certain responsibility put on the victim (your insurance won't pay, if you leave the car keys in), but rape, and only rape, dissolves the victim from any sort of responsibility for bringing themselves in a situation where this was very likely.

I think, this is rather a case of "progressives" (in the broadest sense) are afraid that giving any argumentative ground to the "enemy" will immediately lead to a win for the other side, in that the rapist would be somehow less guilty. I know, where this is coming from, but it's still hypocritical and doesn't really help in the long run.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 year ago (7 children)

The insurance company thing is a bad example, because it’s an example of a for profit company maximizing their profits at the expense of the consumer rather than any kind of moral or ethical statement.

I, for one, do not think leaving your keys in the car excuses car theft.

Just because your back is turned does not mandate me to shoot you, and turning your back on me does not mean that you are complicit in being shot. The exploiting party always, always, needs to have the entirety of blame placed on them.

Risk mitigation is wise and situational awareness is good, but a lack of either of these does not excuse exploitation.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There is something to be said for minimizing the risk of a crime being committed against you, but at absolutely no point should you blame the victim of a crime. I may have left my keys in the car, but the guy who stole it is the guy who stole it. Sure, if I'd remembered my keys, he probably wouldn't have stolen it, but only one of us is to blame for a crime taking place, and it isn't the one that didn't commit a crime.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And those two things don't contradict each other.

A criminal can be a criminal and a victim can be at partial responsibility for creating that situation. This is pretty much uncontroversial for every crime, unless you somehow involve rape. Seriously, replace rape with any other crime, do you think all those people would scream around like they currently do? I doubt it. And that's hypocrisy.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago (3 children)

No. It went over your head again. The victim is not at fault, even partially. The guy who left his keys in the car is not even partially at fault, as stated in their comment, the only one responsible is the person who stole the car. Full stop. Are there things you can do to lower the risk of being a victim? Sure. Are you partially responsible if you don't? NO.

Of course people are more upset about rape than many other crimes because not all crimes are of equal harm to society and others. Murder and speeding are both crimes, are you gonna complain about people focusing on murder over speeding? Is it wrong for the news to cover a murder but not a speeding ticket? Is it that hard to imagine why rape might be seen as a more serious offense?

Is it "hypocrisy" to call out victim-blaming for rape? It's wrong in all cases, but especially heinous in the context of rape, not just because the majority of the victims are women, but because you are acting like rape is a force of nature that can't be stopped, controlled, or lessened. Rape doesn't happen because of the way she dressed or the lack of a man with her, it happened because someone decided to treat her as a sex object and use violence to carry that out.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 year ago (7 children)

It's always the super slutty, naive woman or the super innocent, risk-free woman. Nothing in between.

Wut

And I personally think it's hypocritical to completely separate rape from any other crime. You can't argue, that in any other crime there's a certain responsibility put on the victim (your insurance won't pay, if you leave the car keys in), but rape, and only rape, dissolves the victim from any sort of responsibility for bringing themselves in a situation where this was very likely.

"well I know your husband was murdered but he's the one who decided to be a bank teller during an armed robbery"

You realize how much of an idiot you are, right? Don't rape people. It isn't hard and it isn't the victim's fault. At all. A woman should be able to walk down the street naked at 2 am and not have to worry about your disgusting ass touching her.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

well I know your husband was murdered but he’s the one who decided to be a bank teller during an armed robbery

The sad thing is I do hear people say that about convenience store workers that get shot on the job. Makes me so goddamned mad.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago (7 children)

The vast majority of sexual assault victims know their attacker. What you are saying is that knowing a man is, for a women, inherently high risk and any time we are alone with a man we are putting ourselves in danger and therefore at fault. Are you saying that all men are rapists and we need segregation?

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Such line of thinking has the potential to shift the public opinion and then final judgement in favor of the rapist, believe me it does. I have seen it happen countless times in Turkey. So I would strongly suggest staying as far away as possible from that which can really normalize (even if slightly so) rape in certain kinds of scenarios. And you dont wanna live in that shit hole.

And for the victim who has gone through a traumatic experience, it is like kicking her while she is on the ground. She is probably already going through a lot of regrets and you are there shouting "YEA YOU BETTER FEEL SORRY FOR WHAT YOU DID"

I mean, I think you would also agree that no matter what the location is or how the victim dresses, the amount of punishment should be very heavy so as to be a deterrent. So what is even the point of bringing someone's life choices to a matter of legal debate. Leave it to that person to evaluate it is not your job or ours

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago

You're looking at the problem in a "spherical rape victim in a vacuum" sort of way. There is a whole bunch of context that doesn't fit into your hypothetical.

Sexual victimization is not just another crime. Most sexual assaults are carried out by partners, spouses, and relatives. So the victim has a complicated mix of shame and conflict of interest. Not to mention that a raped women is often viewed as "damaged goods", and a raped man as a sissy, so social status is at risk too.

Society re-victimizes sexual assault survivors and attitudes of victim shaming contribute to this. What victim shaming doesn't do is prevent people from being sexually assaulted. We know this because if victim shaming could reduce sexual assault, rape would be rare.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

For the love of God please just go back to reddit.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

I don't even need to read to know I've met people just like you, and am very much better without them

[–] [email protected] 48 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

“Yes the rapist is at fault, but also women need to be blamed for having the audacity to walk alone at night. Some of us men just can’t help ourselves, and women need to change their behavior of not walking around without a male babysitter instead of men changing their behavior by not raping. She should be held accountable because of this, but not punished. “

So how exactly does the author propose they hold this accountability…? Just a little bit of rape?

Also I love how for his 2nd point he literally just says “No no no, this was taken out of context. He actually meant to say [states literally verbatim what he said]” lol

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I think he meant for 2 that he made separate statements and someone somehow spliced them together with a "but" without making it sound off.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 47 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I like to be free to walk where I want, and I'm a woman. You're saying (or rather, he is. I know y'all are better than this) that because a small percentage of women get raped in alleys every night, no women should be allowed to walk in alleys any night. How about we switch, and no men are allowed out at night at all? Because a small percentage of men commit rape each night, in all kinds of places.

Oh wait, a majority of rapists rape indoors, and rape the women they know well. Oh, and there's a large overlap in the Venn diagram circles of "police" and "rapists." And a larger overlap between "authorities" and "rapists who get away with it." Shit, this problem is bigger than just telling people where to walk at night....

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The problem is massive. Women get raped in parking lots. Women get raped on the subway. Women get raped by doctors. Women get raped in stairwells. Wherever women exist, we get raped.

Yeah, we all take precautions, but it's impossible to totally protect ourselves from being raped, and moreover we shouldn't need to protect ourselves. We ought to be able to live our lives openly with an expectation of safety.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago

Men also get raped, which seems like yet more evidence that the problem just might be rapists; rather than, somehow, women not protecting themselves.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Everyone needs to be able and should protect themselves. You're right, we shouldn't have to, but we live in a cruel, hard, world, full of bad people. Take precautions, be smart, don't take unnecessary risks.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 38 points 1 year ago

“I’m not a rapist, but…” sounds like you are about to say an excuse as to why you are a rapist

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

this is stupid, you cant hold her accountable for a rape even if she was walking naked. It is like saying everyone involved in a car accident should be held accountable even if they did not do anything they got in a car knowing that car accidents are very common.

you can maybe try to criticise for bad decisions on practical grounds but that is a whole other separate thing. And the only thing this will lead to finally is asking someone to forgo some of their rights if they dont want to get raped. very problematic. And then again if you are not a sorry little piece of shit, you should not do that to someone who has just gone through such a traumatic experience. swallowing down your self righteousness and giving unconditional support will likely work better.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I too believe in being free, which is why I don't admit to rape on social media

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago (2 children)

...... Or do it in the first place, right?

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Where is that user i'm getting concerned .

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They're not responding to make the joke funnier.

...

Right?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago
[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

This is a version of that Anakin/Padme meme. And I'm laughing my ass off. Thanks folks.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

I've certainly never raped anyone on social media.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

If one of friends goes to a bad side of town drunk alone and gets beaten up. Its not they're fault and I'm forever sorry it happened to them. But like also c'mon what were you thinking. If a friend goes to a bad part of town drunk and alone and gets raped. It's not their fault either and I'm forever sorry for them. But also like c'mon what were you thinking.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Today Ive decided to walk into a dark alley alone in a high crime rate area, surely nothing bad will happen

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

Least misogynistic Andrew Tate stan ever

/s

load more comments
view more: next ›