For sure billionaires are ultra rich. What about someone with a 10 million? I would consider them rich, but they don't need an atomic clock to count their money. It sounds like I'm being pedantic, but I'm honestly trying to understand.
Great argument. You totally convinced the world with your insult lol
How do you define 'rich', then? Not 'ultrarich', to which I'm thinking that phrase refers in today's world.
ProTip: 28 Days is not a shorthand for 28 Days Later lol
I wasn't a fan of that one. It wasn't terrible, just not as creative and original as 28 Days Later. That said, yes, I would 100% watch it again lol
If you're good with murder, stop talking about it, then, and start acting. But keep in mind, there are worse fates than death.
I have no clue how you went from "I believe murder is wrong" to "praise the nazis", but ok.
Lol!! Yeah, I 100% would have forgotten in your stead
Fair point. Maybe that's the disconnect. To me, 'rich' covers a whole slew of people that aren't even close to billionaires. Someone who is living very comfortably and has, say, £200k in the bank, to me, would be considered rich.
No I understand the origins. But I also have witnessed it used on here as a call to arms. I'm not referring to the origins, with which I fully agree but, rather, to what it has become as of late; it's current colloquial use.
Yes. But people are people. Just like not all us poors are innocent, not all them richs are evil. "eat the rich", for example, sets a presence of blanketed violence that we will never be able to escape. Preemptively killing someone because they might do evil isn't really any difference in end result to where we are now. The "undesirables", as they've been stated earlier, are not all innocent, and the USA government is kicking all of them out, because some of them might be evil (same as killing all the rich, because some of them are evil). I'm all for protecting the innocent, but the cost for doing so cannot be to kill other innocents. I don't have answers, only criticisms, which is one reason I never got into politics. And, in case it wasn't clear, these concentration camps they're proposing are abysmal, evil, and likely illegal (like that ever stopped them before).
Reread my original comment (and all others that followed, if you want). I never, not once, stated that what they're doing is fine, nor did I claim we shouldn't fight back (in fact, I suggested we should fight back and implied we would be right to do so). But people like to see what they want, in order to find a conflict that wasn't there to begin with. I am fully aware of the two concepts you mentioned, though I have a hard time accepting the latter sometimes (but I don't disagree with it). To immediately jump to murder is not the right call (almost never is), but violence can be the right call (but not always).
Ignoring the next two statements, ignores the social contract.
We like to call anyone who disagrees with our points of view, no matter how logical, as a nazi or other, more colorful insults, but never once do we stop to consider a path better than our own.
What this idiot is doing is not fine and must be stopped, but this comment chain calling a total stranger (who, by the way, agrees with your point of view on the original matter of this post) a nazi, is not the way we make a change. If you live in Florida, maybe find your way to your governor and rally in the streets. If you live in the USA, maybe you find your way to your state officials and demand the change. Maybe you can find your way to the site of this atrocious construction, and prevent further development on it or prevent it or ever being used or, I don't know, anything besides online-threatening the lives of people whom you've never met based on the shit they do... Stop bitching and do something about it.