I mean, it's the preferable timeline to what we're experiencing now in the US.
this post was submitted on 03 Jul 2025
111 points (100.0% liked)
Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ
62519 readers
499 users here now
⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.
Rules • Full Version
1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy
2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote
3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs
4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others
Loot, Pillage, & Plunder
📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):
🏴☠️ Other communities
FUCK ADOBE!
Torrenting/P2P:
Gaming:
💰 Please help cover server costs.
 |
 |
|---|---|
| Ko-fi | Liberapay |
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
The original ‘28 Days Later’ is less widely available due to licensing issues, so many have turned to pirate sites instead.
Piracy is a service issue.
Is there a story for why latest did not use the epic masterpiece score used in first 2 movies?
Oh hey, thanks for the reminder I have to get 28 Days Later and 28 Weeks Later before going to watch 28 Years Later.
Did this but 28 weeks is garbage and I gave up
Fortunately 28 years doesn't make a single reference to 28 weeks, so you really can just enjoy it as a sequel to 28 days.
ProTip: 28 Days is not a shorthand for 28 Days Later lol
and 27 dresses is not a prequel
Oh yeah, I started seeding it when there was a surge of people wanting to rewatch it before the new one and it wasn't on streaming sites yet. Easily my biggest ratio, nearly 2000 ratio now.
Thank you for your service :)
You dropped your 👑, king
Can't wait for the Linux ISO to hit the high seas
If you like this movie. Also check out 28 weeks later!
The opening was absolutely amazing and at least that part should be watched.
I wasn't a fan of that one. It wasn't terrible, just not as creative and original as 28 Days Later. That said, yes, I would 100% watch it again lol