Thanks, that was a very valuable warning.
Chemo
joined 1 month ago
Makes sense. But wouldn't that make users extremely picky on the other hand. Like, "I like her, but better spare my Like for someone else that might come along"? Or is the idea that people just toss in money for everyone they like? That seems rather expensive to me.
Do I understand you correct, that I cannot like more profiles then I bought pledges? And then have to wait to get turned down by these profiles to get the chance to like again?
It's a good question. One of the major examples are wheelchairs. They could be much faster then they are but they are deliberately restricted to leg speed. Of course for safety reasons and so on but its kinda obvious that we don't trust anyone disabled to excel non-disabled people.
The stuff that already exists is good enough at what it does that it isn’t worth the investment to make something new. That means fewer devs are needed for writing that software.
Where I work, software gets replaced basially every 7 years. It's almost infuriating. But it pays well.
Thank you. I was wondering just that.
Absolutely
t probably didn’t have anything to do with Firefox itself
It probably did. Google has been caught red-handed with messing with Youtube to break Firefox.
https://www.reddit.com/r/youtube/comments/17z8hsz/youtube_has_started_to_artificially_slow_down/
I don't think any european country has it..
I was wondering the same. Simply seems like a right-wing meme relabeled. Although notice the cyclist and colored hairs.
Take a look at Exodus.
The bitter thing is: we could just implement the "Everyone does X" button. By creating according laws. But that doesn't happen either. Because suddenly "I would do it, if everyone else did it too" turns out to be just an excuse.