So is arguing semantics about where and how the term "lib" is being used a better way to gain allies?
Please.
If you ever do go to X, you'd see MAGA uses "lib" the same way the leftists here do. So sure, Lemmy residents may not be regurgitating MAGA culture, but they sure as shit sound like it by complaining about liberals in the same exact way using the same exact terms.
If you're looking for allies, maybe don't use the same language of your enemies to recruit them.
Your argument boils down to "but people on lemmy use the word "lib" in a good way." It's still the same thought terminating and dehumanizing word my dude, and just because you're admittedly in the dark to how it's being used on Twitter doesn't mean it can be used better by others in a different community.
If we rewind 80 years of history, you'd be defending the right to use the word "jew" to describe those with tight business purses despite it also being used by Hitler for other reasons. You would also defend this position by admitting to not ever reading what's happening in Germany.
Great take.
Would love to hear your ideas on marketing solidarity to liberal allies by using the term "lib" to win them over.
80 years ago it would be making signs that say "Hey Jews - let's work together to stop Hitler!"
Which, to the point I'm making, sounds like bullshit rather than a rally cry.
Literally proving my point how effective you are at distancing your allies.
I don't spend time on X, but X does exist, which means it's possible to look at it without immediately becoming a radicalized MAGA asshole.
You are willing to dismiss my point through an assumption I spend a lot of time on X, so maybe you should care about sounding exactly like all the assholes that do.
Which is the point I'm making. You sound and act just like them. Dismissing conflicting opinions through misplaced assumptions now included.