They're not weighing every passenger forever. They just want to get reliable stats on the average per passenger.
The article states that the information will be kept private.
JoBo
joined 2 years ago
He should not be prosecuted for material published by Wikileaks.
He should stand trial for rape in Sweden.
That is all.
It's not at all clear that what you're saying is true now: They thought loved ones were calling for help. It was an AI scam.
And it's a nailed-on guarantee that it won't remain true for very long at all.
This is the kind of thing that AI actually is good at. Hollywood will use it to make out like bandits and so will criminals.
There's a lot of hyped-up scaremongering about AI but this particular cat is out of this particular bag.
I'm European. Tiny cities exist here too. As do food deserts. When most people drive, local shops and bus services disappear, and people without cars get stranded.
The city of less than 50,000 people
Very small, yes.
Because one of the very few people providing content likes those comics?
Post what you want to see.
Furthermore, the boards themselves typically include fellow C-Suite executives, leading to elite back-scratching as well as a never-ending upward spiral of executive compensation as companies compare their CEO salaries to others.
They're not incentivised to get the best value for money. They're setting the benchmarks by which their own pay is decided.
It's nothing like a market. Who do you imagine the individuals are who set the CEOs pay, and how do you think their pay is decided?
UK house guests will most likely be expecting an English Breakfast Tea, if you insist on buying fancy ones with posh names. We don't call it that, we just call it tea. There's a couple of stray 'lemon' or 'green' in that list but most of them are bog standard blends of black teas called 'tea'.
Be aware that you will have to get lucky to make a proper cup of tea. Most of them supply slightly different blends to different areas of the country depending on how hard the water is.
I didn't mention "everyone". I did mention "anyone". The authors of the linked article explicitly say that they thought it would reduce traffic, and that they were wrong (but for reasons other than the downright obvious).
I don't understand how anyone ever thought they could reduce traffic. Even if they only served people who would otherwise have driven, a cab replacing an A to B and a C to D journey has to do three journeys to replace those two (A to B, B to C, and C to D). It was always going to increase traffic.
You should probably read the whole article before dismissing it. Easily the most sensible thing I've seen written about this.