If this is from earth day 1990, why does it say April 22, 2025 as the title? The post already has the post date on it. The title being today is misleading unless it is the date of the comic.
bisby
If the CPU clocks are dropping to ~200-300 MHz while the temps are 40-45C (like in the screenshot) then it's not thermal throttling. The clockspeed would go back up when the temps go down. And it would only throttle enough to keep the temps under the desired temp.
I would investigate what performance profile the CPU is using.
There is a tool called cpupower
that will list out all the information about the CPU clock states.
I have a Ryzen CPU so the desired governor is going to be different than an Intel laptop, but for example, the output of cpupower frequency-info
for me:
analyzing CPU 13:
driver: amd-pstate-epp
CPUs which run at the same hardware frequency: 13
CPUs which need to have their frequency coordinated by software: 13
energy performance preference: balance_performance
hardware limits: 600 MHz - 5.76 GHz
available cpufreq governors: performance powersave
current policy: frequency should be within 2.98 GHz and 5.76 GHz.
The governor "powersave" may decide which speed to use
within this range.
current CPU frequency: 4.39 GHz (asserted by call to kernel)
boost state support:
Supported: yes
Active: yes
amd-pstate limits:
Highest Performance: 166. Maximum Frequency: 5.76 GHz.
Nominal Performance: 124. Nominal Frequency: 4.30 GHz.
Lowest Non-linear Performance: 86. Lowest Non-linear Frequency: 2.98 GHz.
Lowest Performance: 18. Lowest Frequency: 600 MHz.
Preferred Core Support: 1. Preferred Core Ranking: 231.
Which you can see lists the hardware clock range, the current governor's policy frequency range, the actual current CPU frequency, and how it picks different frequency ranges.
I used to use cpupower on an old laptop to force it into the performance governor, because it would not clock up high enough without it. This obviously does negatively affect battery life, but i was plugged in most of the time anyway.
But either way, look into cpupower for determining the governor/power profile and also figuring out which governor you should actually be using.
Sure.you figure out which parts to scale when.
But point being that it quickly pivots into automating away tasks you were previously doing by hand.
I didnt notice at first but a friend pointed it out: it's the same game loop as cookie clicker. This is just an idle/clicker game. You start manual dealing/clicking. And then you automate it. and it turns into a game of managing your automations rather than actually clicking yourself.
"I was expecting it to be a joke 20 minutes then throw away game, but holy crap, this is actually pretty deep and well thought out." - Also my friend.
AMD doesnt have any software for controlling RGB on windows. They don't make graphics cards, they only make the GPU chip that goes onto the card (and the GPU chip doesn't have any LEDs on it).
The LED controllers on the cards are per brand. If you have a Sapphire card, it's Sapphire software that controls the RGB. XFX card -> XFX software, etc.
I have an XFX 9070xt, and it doesnt have any RGB on it. so I haven't had to disable it.
OpenRGB is going to be your best bet for Linux RGB management. Sometimes they dont have every device supported (especially newer ones), so you might not be able to change everything immediately. But it's mostly just a "scan devices, set color values" once it's working.
And the iGPU you can probably disable in the UEFI config.
Based on the only comparison we have, the OP is twice the age of their sister. so the sister is now 44/2, or 22. Easy problem.
The entire joke is that every organ has a purpose, and the purpose of your brain is to make bad decisions.
My take is that Windows experience sucks so bad that even HP won't touch it. But "HP sucks" is a very valid point.
This can go one of two ways:
- More devices running SteamOS/Linux means more support, and helps Linux
- HP manages to make a device so bad that it makes SteamOS look bad, and hurts Linux
The second way shouldn't even be possible, but never underestimate HP's ability to make something worse than you thought possible.
My current system was installed as manjaro, but i immediately started having AUR issues, so I just changed all the repos out to the official arch ones and over time everything manjaro specific has been updated or removed.
The first lines in my /var/log/pacman.log
are from early 2015, and ive fully rebuilt my computer since then, including swapping hard drives (dd
' to clone old drive onto new drive). So at this point my PC is a hardware and software ship of theseus.
Back in october I travelled for a lan party. I didnt bring my linux desktop with me, and just brought my steam deck and dock, and when I got there, borrowed a keyboard/mouse/monitor.
Then i swapped it to desktop mode, and the people I was with all commented on "Oh wow! it's just like a regular computer"
One of them has explicited said they were fed up with microsoft's BS and would swap their gaming PC over to steamOS once it's formally released for desktop (they were uninterested in Bazzite and wanted an official Valve release for their gaming PC).
It's immutable (you can't break the core OS, there is no deleting system32). You can't install packages (like you would from AUR), but have access to flatpaks.
Firefox is preinstalled, but anything from flathub is also available.
So yes, it has all the things most people need from a desktop OS, and is harder to break, and is supported commercially.
It has a desktop mode, I've never looked into whether you can boot to desktop by default. But I would imagine if they released a desktop friendly version, that would be an option.
Unfortunately that is the target frame rate for steam deck most of the time.
So runs like crap is more like "runs as intended"