pudcollar

joined 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

In the US she'd get a Cabinet seat

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

4 year old article

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago

They say "never shit a shitter", but apparently it should be "always shit a shitter".

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I bet they'd be doing a lot better if the US hadn't stolen $7B USD from their central bank, or you know, bombed the country into oblivion for two decades, or armed and trained the Mujahideen (including Osama) against the Soviets when they wanted to assist Afghanistan's socialist development. No, blame it all on the Taliban, an organization that profoundly reflects US involvement. That way Western capitalist press can manufacture consent for more US involvement. I'm sure Afghani people are hoping we'll "help" more. There is no price too great, if we can raise revenue for US arms manufacturers.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The animal industries have their own lobbying and disinformation campaigns. The pro-corporate media environment is an inextricable part of capitalist society. Their CEOs and those of Exxon et al are all basically saying "we're doing what we're permitted to do, it's your job to reign us in for any social good whatsoever". Any rational actor in a society that permits this will do this if given the opportunity. They're products of their environment. Sometimes they'll get ratioed on X, and agree to some small concession, a mere unconscious twitch of the power of the people causing multibillion $ companies to yelp in terror.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

In a way, he's right. You can't expect a trillion dollar private company to do anything but maximize profits any way they can get away with. It's in the interest of the public to overthrow capitalism and the responsibility falls on us to understand this and do this. ExxonMobil exists with the consent of the masses.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I skimmed it. I don't need convincing that NYT are lying hacks. It's pretty small potatoes imo compared to their usual shenanigans https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_The_New_York_Times_controversies

I thought by the headline they were talking about this https://theintercept.com/2024/02/28/new-york-times-anat-schwartz-october-7/

Usually NYT can be found with their lips on the metaphorical ring of the neoliberal western order, so if they're not full-throated in support of one of its champions, that's a little interesting but not very.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

TLDR they're somehow not kissing Biden's ass enough for Salon, no mention of leaks or fabricated stories

[–] [email protected] 36 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"Latinum lasts longer than lust."

 
 
view more: next ›