I actually appreciate these verses regardless of intentions, because I agree completely with the implied point.
In the new testament, God was only hard on the religious elite, who always missed the point. He cut everyone else a lot of slack.
The idea that government should hold citizens to the same standards as a religion they don't believe in seems insane, and also runs contrary to Jesus teaching or actual Christianity.
Knowledge primarily, since I'm not running a business.
At this point, like they say in Chips, TLS inspection is standard...
If your enterprise isn't doing TLS inspection on everything other than banks, medical, gov, they're doing it wrong.
Some times people think the hard part is getting the CA trust setup, but I find it's far more tedious to deal with certain sites and mobile apps especially that do certificate pinning.
I like OPN also. I've always appreciated the stability of the BSDs.
My only personal complaint with OPN/PF was the TLS inspection.
I've read about adding the modules to *Sense, but I haven't figured out the configuration pieces.
It just works with Sophos UTM and XG firewall, and the configuration was super easy.
You always use what you like though.
This is true, the 6 GB RAM limit and four cores.
I run a pretty enterprise home lab, and I haven't ever seen the devices hit the resource limit.
I have around 3k IPS rules and TLS inspection for most categories of sites except the normal stuff like streaming, banking, etc that you'd not want or need to inspect.
For anyone it might help, I use these as inline proxies rather than as the gateway at the moment. So they have more than just internet traffic going through them, they also have segments of my LANs getting evaluated. Performance has been great so far.
Chris Rock said this best during a bit from the 90s talking about OJ Simpson:
"I'm not saying he should have done it....but I understand"
hates him and sabotages him at every step
Isn't that also describing his children?
Lol, funny because true. We are all so angry about the exploitation.
I did low effort gpt 😉
The claim that medieval peasants worked only 150 days a year and had many holidays off is partially true but oversimplified. The reality is more complex and depends on time period, location, and economic conditions. Here's a breakdown of the historical evidence:
Church Holidays: The Catholic Church mandated numerous feast days (e.g., Christmas, Easter, saints’ days) when labor was restricted. Estimates suggest 80–100 holidays per year in some places, but enforcement varied.
Sunday Rest: Work was generally prohibited on Sundays, adding about 52 non-working days.
Seasonal Workload: Agricultural work was highly seasonal. Planting and harvest times were extremely labor-intensive, while winter months involved less fieldwork but still required tasks like repairing tools, feeding animals, and processing food.
Some economic historians estimate that medieval peasants worked fewer days annually than modern industrial workers. However, 150 days seems too low, as it assumes every feast day and Sunday was fully work-free, which was not always the case.
Many peasants supplemented their farming with additional work (e.g., weaving, milling, carpentry) during "off" periods.
While feast days provided breaks, peasant life was physically demanding. Workdays could be long (often from sunrise to sunset).
Hunger, disease, and social obligations (such as corvée labor—unpaid work for the lord) made life challenging.
Despite rest periods, subsistence farming meant that food shortages and unpredictable weather could quickly lead to hardship.
Conclusion
The idea that medieval peasants had an easy work schedule with extensive holidays is partly true in the sense that they had more frequent breaks than modern 9-to-5 workers. However, their work was far more physically demanding, they faced food insecurity, and their "off days" didn't always mean leisure. The claim of a 150-day work year is likely exaggerated but does reflect the fact that medieval societies structured work differently from modern capitalism.
I would be nice if we would fund our own program like this locally.
We shouldn't need federal government to make our city nice, but I know there's the obvious problem of finding how to pay for it without raising taxes or cutting someone else's budget.
I don't know enough about the state or city budget.
I like the efforts to increase bike and walking trails.
Maybe we could get city officials to sneak this stuff into other projects.
But not too much because trees and mental health are indeed woke.
I'm sorry. I am one of those people driving 75.
Sing "I can't drive 55..."
But seriously, 55 is nuts.
I know everyone considers 75 too fast, but I am not weaving through traffic, always using a signal, and not doing that during snow/ice/etc, nor am I using my damn phone texting and posting on Facebook.
If everyone would actually pay attention, I'd prefer we all go 70.
Quick reminder, everyone struggles with wanting to be validated and downvotes by random Lemmy users around the world don't matter.
Take a breather, touch grass/snow and remember no ones opinion on here matters, especially mine 😉
I would like for some of the prominent church leaders to speak about that. Even if they don't publicly contest it, though that should be considered, they could at least speak to congregations about it.
Coincidentally, one of, or the (I don't know) paster for the North view church gave a somewhat similar message along with the typical hope in Jesus Easter message.
He played that news caster who was ranting about "I don't care about your Christian religion". Maybe I can edit with a link, but my favorite part was the paster expression agreement with her. She was loud and angry, but there must be a reason or a very bad experience with people claiming the name, but I agree with her.
All this seems too similar to the religious freedom act that felt more like bigotry than freedom. I'm a pretty garbage or luke warm follower, but I detest bigotry under the banner of the church. I still believe that the two are not the same thing when done correctly.
Also, thanks for the actual references and apparent understanding, rather than just unbridled hate.
Edit, video was Ana Kasparian. I think it was largely about abortion, but still relevant.