unmagical

If you habitually use it on simple or clear turns or empty roads you will habitually use it when there are people around. That's a good habit to have.

Lights on always and signal whenever you're deviating from your current lane.

They are all citizens. They have all the same rights. Trump won't draw any distinction between them. Trump has already been attacking the rights of everyone, including citizens.

The graphic implies a sequence or hierarchy (à la "First they came") with Trump either planning to destroy each pillar himself or have them toppled like dominoes. However, this does not accurately reflect the nature of the attacks that have already occurred. Trump did not step through a hierarchy, he attacked everyone that he perceived as a threat to his power--much more similarly to a bomb placed in the middle of the pillars toppling all at once.

By all means, feel free to educate.

Why are citizens on there 3 times when they are indistinguishable categories and why are they so far to the right when he's already publicly talked about sending citizens to the torture prison?

So we tried all the illegal options first?

It's a temporary surrender, which means someone else has to store and keep track of your gun and give it back later. I agree that could just be made available to anyone, but I can understand why it may be limited to those at a more immediate risk than, say, just wanted it to be someone else's problem while they go on vacation.

And just like that every American good costs significantly more.

If your family income is less than about $200,000, congratulations, your tax rate has at least doubled.

Is that not the natural state of trees?

These the same guy's that let the Nazis have a rally?

But a shirt that says "Ban Dolan" is "offensive in nature" and makes "threats against an MSG executive?"

Genesis 9:21

• Hiding migrants
• Feeding the poor
• Kicking the police off someone they're choking out

To the small handful of socially liberal and fiscally conservative folks that found this thread let me ask a few questions:

• Does it make more fiscal sense to build a chemical treatment plant next to a neighborhood of people that can afford lawyers or a neighborhood of those that can't?
• What is the social makeup of each of those neighborhoods?
• How did that social makeup come to be?