warm

You are telling us YouTube is all slop and posting pictures of videos as evidence of the sort, I didn't make an assumption, I just went along with what you said. Get some self-awareness seriously, are you reading what you are typing?

You do you, if you want to read go ahead. You are just entirely missing the point and just assuming we all consume media in a way you preconceived in your "unbroken" brain.

There's an incredible amount of educational and fun content on YouTube, just because you watch slop and it's associated recommendations, doesn't mean I or others do.

What else has such a catalog? Going to be hard to persuade creators to host their own content with ads and subscriptions.

You can take all claims against me and direct them at yourself. You are stuck at such a low elo you have no idea what happens higher up. Just crazy takes...

You fall under the category of players who cant tell the difference between bots and real players. So perhaps low elo should just be placed against bots and let other players have real matches.

You are delusional if you think I want to stomp every match. I want to have fun in every match, if I am against worst players, I can fuck around with random weapons, if I am against better players I have to try harder than usual if I want to win. Match diversity! If I am against the same skill every match, then I have to sweat every match and thats fucking boring.

Maybe once you get better at games, you will understand more, but you dont seem to want to improve though. So you should just play versus bots every game, you wont even know if they are players anyway and you can avoid the scary world of players who are better than you.

At that point they might as well let you plug in a mouse to the console and then you might as well just buy a Steam Deck anyway.

Yes, hence the "as possible". I just mean, they wouldn't fire into the air like they do in movies at like 70+ degrees.

He doesn't understand what VAT is.

How to isolate your country:

I am talking about arrows which are lit on fire, not gunpowder arrows. Which even then, only handful of situations are listed out the how many thousands upon thousands of battles bow and arrows were a part of throughout history?

From the Wikipedia entry for "flaming" arrows:

Flaming arrows required the shooter to get quite close to their desired target and most will have extinguished themselves before reaching the target

I will add flaming to my original reply, but I have seen both used interchangably for the same thing.

They wouldn't shoot arrows up into the air, like in movies, because then you lose all the power of the arrow. They would be fired as direct as possible to give the arrow the most speed and thus the highest chance of piercing armour.

We might never know, but they probably didn't even do these commands anyway, it doesn't make sense when you think about it. There would likely have just be a command to begin the attack and then each archer would loose arrows repeatedly at any target they thought they could hit.