this post was submitted on 11 Feb 2025
78 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

9658 readers
939 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

So, lets see. So far in this thread cycle paths should be wide enough for an emergency vehicle, should be used by all manners of transport other than automobiles and speed restricted due to slow moving scooters and pedestrians.

Sounds like it removes all the benefits and adds all the problems of the system we currently have.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

I don't think they should necessarily be speed restricted, nor is that the law where I live - the only rule is that you can't exceed the speed limit on adjacent roads (which practically makes them unbounded for almost all cases for cyclists under their own power).

By making them wide enough for emergency vehicles, they can accommodate both slower and faster moving cyclists, with mobility vehicles moving at similar speeds to slower cyclists and hence automatically being accommodated. I don't think pedestrians should be co-located with cyclists and mobility vehicles, as these actors have different incompatible needs.