this post was submitted on 14 Mar 2025
126 points (100.0% liked)
Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ
59194 readers
619 users here now
⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.
Rules • Full Version
1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy
2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote
3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs
4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others
Loot, Pillage, & Plunder
📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):
🏴☠️ Other communities
Torrenting/P2P:
Gaming:
💰 Please help cover server costs.
 |
 |
|---|---|
| Ko-fi | Liberapay |
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Genuine question...why's this comment getting downvoted?
I use both torrents and usenet in my setup, and none of the usenet sites I frequent have done down like the big torrent sites in recent years. It seems like a reasonable suggestion.
Usenet is harder to use
Usenet is more expensive
As someone who's been around a while, I disagree. The tools now are so much easier than those when ISPs mirrored usenet, and the cost is so much less than just internet back then
~~I don't think Usenet is really more difficult to use than Torrents.~~ While writing I noticed you have to pay for a Usenet provider (and likely the indexer too), which does make it more difficult than torrent. But only if you live in a region where piracy is not persecuted and you can skip the VPN.
Usenet: You buy a provider and put it's credentials into sabNZBd. You have an indexer, which gives you a .nzb, which you put into sabNZBd to download your files. If your provider is missing pieces the download might fail.
Torrent: You buy a VPN and bind qBittorrent to it. You have an tracker, which gives you a .torrent, which you out into qBittorrent to download your files. If there's no seeder or you aren't port forwarded the download might fail.
The Sonarr/Radarr/Lidarr/etc team, and their support forums/subreddit are seriously the worst about this. Nearly every question, concern, or request with regard to torrent trackers is met with a smug response about usenet.
Assholes have started exploiting Sonarr's torrent pulling system to trick it into downloading fucking malware on people's computers, and rather than acknowledge this is an issue their users are facing and they should try and do something to help them, they've done nothing, expecting users to deal with it in their clients and through addons. The implication is if you're not using usenet, they don't care what their software puts on your computer. It's your fault for using public trackers.
Is usenet the Arch of piracy? Like in every thread about torrents someone jumps in with "I use usenet btw"
I use torrents because they're free. A friend uses Usenet, and while it's a good service, they've got to pay for it.
I use Arch to access usenet.