AskUSA

456 readers

35 users here now

About

Community for asking and answering any question related to the life, the people or anything related to the USA. Non-US people are welcome to provide their perspective! Please keep in mind:

[email protected] - politics in our daily lives is inescapable, but please post overtly political things there rather than here
[email protected] - similarly things with the goal of overt agitation have their place, which is there rather than here

Rules

Be nice or gtfo
Discussions of overt political or agitation nature belong elsewhere
Follow the rules of discuss.online

Sister communities

Related communities

founded 3 months ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

What do you think of the ruling today that AI art can't be copyrighted? (www.reuters.com)

submitted 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

10 comments fedilink hide all child comments

HN thread

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (2 children)

US Copyright Office

But who knows what rules this could be changed to have to follow, potentially even mere days to weeks from now.

Nothing is certain anymore, in regards to the USA governmental functions.

(Edit: test edit, please ignore this.)

[–] [email protected] 5 points 4 days ago

Sure, and if the Unhinged States of America decides to toss copyright completely overboard in its current thrashing, well, I won't be complaining. 🫠️

Until we hear otherwise though, I'll assume the findings of the Copyright Office are correct. They seem reasonable enough given current tech and the assumption that copyright does continue to exist.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 days ago

I imagine that the copyright office is too boring when for Nazis to touch, but I've been wrong before.