politics
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
view the rest of the comments
I want AOC, Warren, Jasmine Crockett, and Buttigeg. They have been the only politicians in rank that I've felt have been representing. And Walz, too.
Don't forget Bernie, he's been going around the country holding how to fight the oligarchy rallies
Yeah 😢 It's sad that an 83 year old is one of our strongest fighters. I believe he is also not seeking reelection.
He's not far off my mother's age and she's doing great so I have that to compare to but jaaayyysus.... I would not want to be fighting as hard as he is at his age. Man deserves some rest.
My grandmother is 82 and is still heavily active in her garden club, church, and spending time with all her family including me.
No. He's been holding "please fight the oligarchy" rallies while saying little to nothing on how.
From what I've read, he's being pretty clear about primarying moderate "Democrats" and voting out Republicans.
Yes, which is... Not helpful. If that worked on its own America wouldn't be here. There are massive obstacles all over that he's just ignoring, and it's that part of the equation that I'd call the "how"; voting people you like into office is just the victory lap.
Incidentally, he and AOC having this roadshow that's traveling to red areas in particular is in part doing that job of tearing down obstacles all over. He's not lazily telling other people to do it, he's just doing it and showing how.
I hope they keep the full-court press going for the entire election cycle. I think it'll be most powerful during the primary campaign when they've put in the work leading up to it; and since their votes in Washington aren't super effective most of the time, I think this is probably the best use of their time.
At the rate America is going primaries won't matter because elections won't matter. If you think Trump won't have significantly curtailed democracy in America by the midterms you need to take a look at the news for once. The most important obstacles to taking down the oligarchy are Trump's wannabe authoritarian regime and the entrenched political establishment, and Bernie's tour is doing nothing to address the former and very little to address the latter in a reasonable timescale.
I mean, I'm not sure what else you expect him to say.
I don't expect him to say anything. Don't get me wrong the problem isn't so much Bernie himself as it is progressives' worship of Bernie as the new messiah of progressivism, though he's not doing nearly enough to dispel that illusion. Now what I want him or any other progressive leader with national recognition to say is that the only hope for change will come from the streets and that the people must protest, march, strike, boycott and whatever else they can do until their demands are met. Again I'm not expecting Bernie to say this, but a time where America needs geese Americans must be willing to call a duck a duck and accept that no matter how much they squint a duck will never be a goose. This is necessary before you can search for the geese you need.
Looking at Bernie's history, I don't think there's any way he would disagree with you.
Maybe, but many of Bernie's supporters do disagree with me, so this is something that needs to be said.
Elizabeth Warren talks a big game, but she shrivels under pressure. I'd love her if she were half the person she claims to be.
Honestly, I'll take that any day of the week. It's far better than someone like Newsom who is actively courting right wing figureheads so he can agree with them about how bad progressives are.
The party would be so much better if we could get rid of the members that hate progressives.
I would like for them to split off from the party and start a new movement dedicated to fighting for the people. They have the influence to start a way stronger 3rd party than modern is politics has ever seen.
At bare minimum, they should band together as a new sect of the Democratic Party and establish that their ring of the party advocates for people instead of oligarchs.
They need to do a progressive takeover of the democratic party. Just like how the MAGA extremists took over the republic party
Exactly this. When the GOP had similar problems, they sparked the "Tea Party" that ended up taking over the party.
We need a "Guillotine Party" to do the same for the Democrats.
lol I still would rather they just start a third party, but maybe I could get behind Guillotine Democrats
The third party spoiler effect tends to hand elections to the worst option on the ballot. Rebuilding an extant party accomplishes the same intent.
I agree with this. The time to split is now.