this post was submitted on 04 Jul 2025
364 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

10069 readers
493 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

How to say Marx was right without saying "Marx was right".

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Has been for ages. It's now question of how bad, and we are still making it worse.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 day ago (3 children)

I’m sick of this WE, im not a billionaire pumping more Co2 per day with my yacht fleet than a town of people do in their life. I’m sick of being blamed for this shit, when all my conservation is undone in a minute by a corporation. I refuse to take equal blame any longer

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Good point. I try my best, but even if like 90 % of the population tried harder, it would barely offset the billionaire companies killing our planet.

They're the problem, always has been that way.

I think it's time to stop them.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

This simply isn’t correct. While the billionaires yacht fleet and jet setting make them have insane carbon footprints individually, it is their business practices that actually register in terms of contributing significant chunks of the carbon budget for humanity. Bezo’s jets and yachts pale in comparison to Amazons delivery fleet and manufacturing all that junk. It’s counterproductive to focus on their personal emissions, when it’s the interaction of their businesses, government, and consumers that are burning the earth. We have 2 levers on that problem.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

You're right. I was thinking more about the individuals responsible capture and refining of fossil fuels.

But the pretty ubiquitous use of Amazon delivery does greatly contribute a lot. Didn't really think about it in that aspect. Thanks for pointing that out.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago (2 children)

The best we can do for the planet is toss a few billionaires into a volcano as a sacrifice to earth

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

Now that's some carbon sequestration

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Well, one way in which we can help fight against climate change is by not eating meat or dairy products.

For anyone curious about the subject, there's some good science backing that up, though the links I'm providing are lazy DDG searches, so if anyone wants to do it, they can probably find better sources out there with more information.

The average cow can produce somewhere between 100-500 litres of methane a day, which is 23 times more powerful as a greenhouse gas than carbon dioxide.

Alfalfa and other grass hays is a crop that used a crazy amount of water, and it's grown primarily to feed cows.

Going vegan, or at least mostly vegan, is the way to go. Can start with going vegetarian and at least swapping out meat sources. Alternative vegan protein sources

With that being said, I do not practice what I preach. I should, though.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Again though, I do all these things and it doesn’t matter cause my entire life’s output of CO2 is being put out by one guy in an hour. I’m turning off lights and corporate buildings are running all the lights and AC 24/7

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

If the majority of people did, it actually would make a massive difference. This whole "but billionaires" and "but corporations" is just being used as an excuse to do absolutely nothing by far too many people.

All of those people doing nothing are why we are in this mess.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The actual problem is democratic oligarchism/zionism/neocon warmongering/US colonialism. Protecting establishment is easily supported when higher priorities than human sustainability can be manufactured. The more miserable you are made, the less you care about "higher level Maslow hierarchy needs" at political level.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The best way to reduce all the excess manufacturing for livestock is by not buying it their products. If it's all about ROI for them, give them a reason to reduce their manufacturing with your purchasing power.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 hours ago

The best way to reduce all the excess manufacturing for livestock is by not buying it their products.

has that ever worked?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

A lot of people in western countries are living unsustainable lifestyles. Yes we need to target the billionaires too, but that alone won't solve it. Also stop buying their shit. Actually, just stop buying shit in the first place as that is a large part of the problem.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

And we're gonna increasingly train more AI, mine more crypto, open more coal mines, industrially kill more animals, fight more wars.