this post was submitted on 10 Jul 2025
85 points (100.0% liked)

World News

346 readers
407 users here now

Please help and contribute as we vote on rules:
https://quokk.au/post/21590

Other Great Communities:

Rules

Be excellent to each other

founded 9 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 18 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Overall, the deal involves as many as 180 tanks

[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Any hot war is going to expend that in weeks or less. Laudable perhaps to describe war as insane - but not exactly realistic.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 days ago (1 children)

NATO military doctrine doesn't require as many tanks has the Soviet doctrine, which Russia is still using, does.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago (1 children)

So, what - do you think this is just mismanagement of funds? Possibly to meet the minimum defense spending, I suppose. It could be.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)

Well it's the military, so mismanagement of funds is a given. But that's not what I'm saying.
I'm saying that this number was probably aligned with the rest of NATO already, and that NATO doesn't expect to lose 180 tanks by driving them single-file on a highway.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

It's 180 in that first batch. Contract apparently is for 1,000. With a joint effort of production, so the last batch will be fully assembled in Poland.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 days ago

180 tanks in a week? No way.