this post was submitted on 11 Jul 2025
135 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

10122 readers
646 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

  2. Misinformation is not welcome here.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Explicit sexual content, defined by the province as detailed and clear depictions of sexual acts, including masturbation, penetration and ejaculation, will not be accessible to students in any grade.

also

Religious texts, such as the Bible, will be allowed on the shelves.

I'm shocked... really, like, i 100% knew that was going to be in there article. So actually, I'm not shocked. Fuck you Alberta.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago (4 children)

NGL this sounda like a nothing burger. The news are "Adults Only" books are no longer awolled in schools? What non smutty book even fulfills that criteria?

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 days ago

The bible is still not removed, which has incest, adultery, more incest with rape, prostitution, more prostitution. I can list more. My question is, what is wrong with regular books, with sex in them?

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Lolita, The French Lieutenant's Woman, IT. All books I read as a teen with explicit sexual content...

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

And you borrowed these books from your school's library?

To clarify: You borrowed fucking Lolita from your school's library? And you want other kids to be able to do the same?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago)

Were you homeschooled by a pigeon? Fuckin hell, I can’t believe people like you exist outside of satire.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Yeah. A couple of years after I first read it, I wrote a coursework essay about the unreliable narrator, using Lolita and Pale Fire as my primary texts (the latter also by Nabokov). What's the problem with that? I'm assuming you've not read either if you're getting this outraged, lol

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

Ah. We clearly had different experiences of high school. Lmao.

So is it or is not explicit btw? Does it contain 'detailed and clear depictions of sexual acts, including'? Because you seem to lean into whatever is the opposite of what I say lol. But we're taking about OP.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I mean it's pretty graphic when he compares her ring to a football pump before going into licking it, but it's also hilarious

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I don't know what to tell you. If this metaphor qualifies as a 'detailed and clear' depiction of sex for you, sure I guess? I see what you're saying in that case.

Maybe I've just been exposed to more clear and detailed written depictions of sex lol.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

yes we get it you're a conservative, you don't have to prove it by continuing to try to twist facts to match your predetermined worldview

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Did you reply the wrong comment?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

ah yes lack of self awareness too

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yikes. Glad I'm taking to a lefty and not to a hateful right winger. Lmao.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 14 hours ago (1 children)

The right doesn't have a monopoly on hate, the difference is you're always punching down

[–] [email protected] 2 points 12 hours ago

Whereas the left get to hate everyone! Even each other! But the hardest part of the hate is reserved for those who would reduce the quality of our experiences by being dickheads. Say, by restricting access to art. I'm with you brother! Let us hate together! Maybe even each other!

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 days ago

How did it go again... "I know pornography when I see it.", wasn't it?

Which, honestly, is actually rather impressive as far as non-answers to things in general go in that it not only made the speaker simultaneously sound both like a condescending prick AND some sort-of super creepy dude who is waaaay too into porn, all while assuring us that these qualities gave them the necessary authority to... Identify porn, I guess? Ya know, like that wood book fellow

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

My brother an I came up with 'Gemmell theory' which breaks down all his characters by archetype. Female archer, strong willed, 'manly' in some regards, yet sexy. Warrior. Has seen some shit, probably had a deal with a demon and/or has a destiny. Bard. Light comic relief. Probably a mate of the warrior. May know a little light magic. You get the idea. I think there are only about 5 archetypes in Gemmell theory.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Oh for sure. There is of course a gentle-soul warrior that is cursed with killing being his only real talent, and the giant that hide a lot of emotions under surface. Most of his books are very symilar to eachother, to the point that he uses exactly the same comparisons, metaphors and jokes sometimes... I still think he's a master-writer. Gemmel writing heroic fantasy is like Kubrick directing a porn. Genre is not enough to obscure the genius behind it.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 12 hours ago

Oh I think those two are the same as the warrior, lol. My archetypes have a little tolerance. But there's definitely a dual strand -- the 'dark' hero (waylander) and the 'light' one (druss). Both ends up characterised by both aspects usually though, which is why in Gemmell theory they're unified.

Best one was lion of Macedon. I still think about that sometimes.