304
submitted 1 week ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

For those who do not believe that UBI is unsustainable on scale:

The idea of UBI: “Universal Basic Income (UBI) is a social welfare concept that proposes providing all citizens or residents of a particular country or region with a regular, unconditional sum of money, regardless of their income, employment status, or wealth”

There are 32,708,656 Canadians as of 2024 aged 20 or older according to population estimates.

https://www150.statcan.gc.ca/t1/tbl1/en/tv.action?pid=1710000501

The 2023-2024 total revenues for Canada was $459.5 billion.

https://www.canada.ca/en/department-finance/services/publications/annual-financial-report/2024.html#a9

The article cites the experiment where the participants received either $16,989 CAD/year as a single person or $24,027 CAD/year. UBI is supposed to be the same payment regardless of any status, so I am going to use the single person amount for scale.

32,708,656 * $16,989 = $555,687,356,784

$555,687,356,784 - $459,500,000,000 = $96,187,356,784

Canada would need to make almost $100 billion more in revenue every year just to cover UBI, and that does not include anything else Federal revenue is used for.

UBI is not sustainable on scale, and there are better options.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

Not even the slightest interest in figuring out the truth?

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

Explain it to me. Preferably with your own numbers, and assessments.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

I told you earlier that I don't have numbers. My assessment is that the numbers you provided aren't valid and I explained why in the last two comments. You can respond to those if you like. Repeating what you've said word for word does not add any new information. If you don't want to continue the discussion, that's fine, but if you have insight on why my reasoning might be wrong, I'd like to hear it.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

Your reasoning is wrong because it has nothing to do with my point. There has been no discussion because of that. It is a simple math problem.

Take care.

this post was submitted on 17 Jul 2025
304 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

10206 readers
375 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS