this post was submitted on 30 Apr 2024
14 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

9648 readers
544 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (3 children)

tldr: why not just use drones.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

We need both fighters and drones.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Human self-importance.

We think we're magic, despite the fact we aren't built for high g dogfights at all.

Kind of the same reason us being space colonizers is a pipe dream at this stage in our civilization. We can get a dozen highly trained peak human specimens to grow potatoes on Mars as a symbol, and I'm all for that, but not regular people. One mistake everybody dead, one cabin fever victim in the right position everybody dead. We literally can't even care for the almost infinitely forgiving habitat we evolved out of that's perfectly suited to our biology, and all that would require is stop actively, recklessly fucking it up.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago

Modern air combat isn't about dogfights anymore. A plane like the F-35 is an asset in the air because of its sensor suite way more than because of its ability to deploy ordnance. It'll let us patrol our massive airspace much more effectively than the 5-6 operational CF-18s we currently have.

Yes, drones will be important, but for long-range combat they'll get used in conjunction with manned aircraft in the air. The F-35 is a formidable platform for that. Tomorrow's air combat will probably consist of squadrons of autonomous drones under the command of a manned aircraft flying with them in formation.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (2 children)

tldr: why not just use drones.

Exactly, as mentioned in the article, manned warplanes are mostly a thing of the past in modern war.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

They said that when the Avro Arrow was scrapped. There's been at least 6 more fighter jets built since then!

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Remind me how far (high) a drone can be from a good radio repeater and still be controlled?

Yeah. Thought so.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

There are many types of drones, like missiles… <sheesh!>

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Remind me how many G's can a human sustain for longer than 30 seconds? We're building planes that are capable of doing things that would kill their pilots on a regular basis. Our soft, squishy bodies are the biggest limit in terms of maneuverability of the aircraft at this point.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

A signal jammer and there goes your drones.