this post was submitted on 09 May 2024
246 points (100.0% liked)

News

28930 readers
5723 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 127 points 11 months ago (13 children)

Real wages are up for three straight years; they were unmoved or negative for nearly four decades before that. Your feelings about the economy don't matter when the data all goes in the other direction

[–] [email protected] 76 points 11 months ago (1 children)

People are (sometimes willfully) confusing "the current status quo is fucked" with "there is no improvement resulting from the measures taken by the administration". The former is true - the latter is not.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Current status quo is the economy that's better than ever

Aren't you asking for too much? Take a small win

[–] [email protected] 8 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (3 children)

Bollocks.

That entire political propaganda point is based on grabbing a nominal salary growth in 2023 that is trying to catch up to the inflation of 2021/22 (and the salary growth is already starting to tailing off) and adjusting to make a "real" salary growth using present day inflation which is half as much the one in 2021/2022.

It's all based on a mathematical artifact that salary growth reflects inflation with a delay of about 2 years and just so happens last quarter of 2023 and first of 2024 are a sweet spot were 2y delayed inflation minus present day inflation yields the maximum value.

Extend those maths back 3 or 4 years and the picture is much worse but that can be "safelly" argued away by propagandists as being due to Trump. Well if that is due to Trump then so is the recent spike in salary growth since it's pretty much a perfect match to the inflation of 2 years ago that was supposedly due to Trump.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 11 months ago (1 children)

You legit have no idea why rural Americans are so damn upset, do you?

Sure, fascism. But why fascism?

Breaks my heart to think of how Dems and Reps have completely abandoned so many of our fellow Americans, despite how deplorable and insufferable some/many may be

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago (2 children)

What? I don't understand this post at all

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

Let me try and breakdown my thought.

If you consider the conditions that led to fascism in Germany before the 2nd world war, you learn that there were significant economic worries that affected the average German.

When you look at what is leading to fascism in middle/rural America, you will find very similar, significant economic concerns.

Filmmaker Michael Moore was criticized for saying Trump had a very good chance of winning in rural areas because of how angry and desperate the average American living in those areas is, and yet he was right about Trump's chances of winning and about the reasons why.

Fascism doesn't spring out of nowhere. There are conditions that make it more likely to spread. Those conditions are greatly affected by domestic policy.

Lastly, it's worth knowing that famous quote by JFK saying his family didn't experienced any significant struggle during the great depression, which is infamous for being absolutely devastating for many Americans. That disconnect is likely happening again, except this time our leaders are either gaslighting us or are actively unaware of the problem. I'm not sure which is worse, or if it makes a difference.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Current status quo is the economy that’s better than ever

Every time I challenge this nonsense, that people are pushing that the economy is better than ever, they never back it up with anything. I don't expect this to be any different. We're kind of in uncharted territory and there is plenty of mixed emotion about the outlook for the economy.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Puts a graph of just the middle quintile, since 2019, and a quote from god knows when, of the super majority of people saying their finances are good or better..to prove that people are claiming the economy is better than ever.

Lol I can see why you provided just pictures rather than links because this seems blatantly deceptive.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 35 points 11 months ago (3 children)

Your feelings about the economy don’t matter when the data all goes in the other direction

Except its not "all the data". Its "the data we've always used to measure this up to now".

The disconnect is that classic measurements of national economic health used to reflect the earning and spending power of average Americans. So using the same basket of measures and things that can affect those was a valid approach. In recent years those measurements don't reflect average Americans anymore. Inflation has eaten away at the value of savings impacting older Americans. High interest rates are now acting as a double whammy for young Americans that need borrow for higher education as well as first time home buyers, but the costs of both have risen sharply in the last 20 years. So while the high cost has been a problem, the now high interest rates are a force multiplier stepping on the necks of young Americans.

I don't disagree that Biden's actions have improved classic measurements. Those are still valid and useful for where they apply. I disagree that those measurements still reflect the experience of regular Americans. Thats a problem that extra economic measures should be included when looking at the experience of regular Americans.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Your feelings about the economy don’t matter when the data all goes in the other direction

Except its not "all the data". Its "the data we've always used to measure this up to now".

I hear you saying an apples-to-apples comparison to show a point is ... somehow bad.

Sometimes I just don't know what people want.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 11 months ago

I hear you saying an apples-to-apples comparison to show a point is … somehow bad.

You're gonna have to grow out of just thinking there are only two outcomes: "good" and "bad". The world is more complicated than that. The classic indicators don't reflect the modern average American experience anymore. They were chosen in a different time under different circumstances. They were chosen when a college education cost a couple of thousand dollars a year, a average blue color worker could buy a brand new car every two years, and a small house was easily affordable for a single income earner with the other staying at home raising kids. Clearly you can see how this is now out-of-date with modern American life.

They're fine as a useful apples-to-apples comparison to national economic health, but today fail to show what average Americans experience.

Sometimes I just don’t know what people want.

Introduce some nuance into your worldview and that may help you understand.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 11 months ago

This. Buying power of the average American has decreased drastically. If you worked for the last five years and your pay has changed you've technically made less money every year as the power of the dollar has diminished. If you're on a fixed income it feels even worse.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago

There are plenty of problems with CPI, one of which is the very issue of “feelings”. Owners equivalent rent is absolutely irrelevant to actual rent costs. It’s just how much a homeowner says they would charge if they were to rent out their place. These are not the people renting out units…they’re just someone who happened to have enough money to buy a house. WTF do they know.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Peasants, We have increased your daily crumb rations by 1.2%. Be grateful for that.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 23 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Are they? I got a 3% ‘raise’ again this year and that doesn’t seem like it’s keeping up with inflation. And yes yes get a different job, blah blah.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Your example is N=1

But inflation is also around 3% so why would you expect a bigger raise?

[–] [email protected] 31 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Are you seriously asking why someone would expect a bigger raise than just keeping up with inflation?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I'm asking why one person's employment history matters when we can analyze 100 million

[–] [email protected] 22 points 11 months ago

No you didn't ask that, you asked why they would expect a bigger raise when inflation is around 3%. The answer is because they obviously think their job isn't that terrible.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Two things:

  • Judging by the increase in prices reported by many as well as shrinkflation, Official Inflation Figures in the US might be very understated, which would make that "real" part of real wage rise be complete total bollocks, since a wage adjusted to a smaller inflation index value than reality is not in fact "real". Considering that understating Official Inflation not only helps in political propaganda like the "real wages" one but also mathematically feeds to a higher GDP Growth figure (in simple terms: the unaccounted for inflation appear as "growth") which is also heavilly featured in political propaganda, it's pretty naive to think that there isn't political pressure to "adjust" that figure down, especially in an election year.
  • Independently of that, it's perfectly possible for the average real wage (which is what's reported) to be going up whilst the median real wage (which is more representative of most people's experience and is not what's reported) to be stagnant or even falling: all it takes is for the top earners to be getting significant raises to pull the average up enough that it disguises everybody else not getting such raises.

PS: To add to my second point, here's an interesting chart. Even though it's an overall unweighted nominal (so, not real) value and it's a 3 month moving average (so the effects are shown delayed) you can see a spike and subsequent fall towards the trend in 2023. Now look at this inflation chart and you can see that the median salary growth is delayed from inflation and never actually managed to be as high as the actual inflation. This actually brings up a 3rd point I hadn't considered:

  • The salary growth is delayed from inflation, so what we saw in 2023 (and which is now slowing down as per the first chart) is salaries trying to catch up with the high inflation of 2021/22 (and failing) but the inflation by then was already much lower. Obviously if one completelly ignores the last 5 years (which is a common technique in political propaganda) and just calculates "real" wage growth from present day wages and present day inflation, the result will be positive, simply because salaries are still trying to catch up to the inflation of 2-3 years before. However if one adds up the median real wage growth of the last 4 years, the picture is significantly worse.
[–] [email protected] 20 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Lol

Look, peasants, wages have gone up by slightly less than 1% for reasons having nothing to do with the government, be grateful!

[–] [email protected] 9 points 11 months ago

They went down in the 1970s and 1980s, and stagnated in 2000s, the last decade of growth hasn't been seen since the 1990s

[–] [email protected] 16 points 11 months ago

Your statements about it matter as much as his opinion without sources. Not disagreeing or agreeing, just seeing two opinions and no facts.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

But I think you can understand why three years of improvement after four decades of stagnation might not dramatically move peoples' perception of the economy. Plus, are real wages up for everyone? Is it average real wages? Median? There's a big difference. It's entirely possible some people are experiencing much more real wage growth than others.

Edit: apparently a lot of you are confused. You seem to think that if wages are up for some, they must be up for all. That's not how it works. Not everyone got a raise over the last three years. Some people did, others didn't. Some people saw their income increase dramatically, some saw their income stay about the same, and some saw their income go down. And that's true whether the incomes in question are measured in "real" (inflation adjusted) terms or are nominal figures.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Bro, go look up "real wages" before you bring some dumbass questions in here.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 11 months ago

Ok, I looked it up. Here's what I found from investopedia:

Real income is how much money an individual or entity makes after accounting for inflation and is sometimes called real wage when referring to an individual's income. Individuals often closely track their nominal vs. real income to have the best understanding of their purchasing power.

Now that I have an exact definition, explain how anything I wrote was a "dumbass question." Frankly, I don't think I'm the dumbass here...

[–] [email protected] 9 points 11 months ago

"Is it average real wages? Median?"

That's the crux of their question, not what real wages means.

If it's defined by an individual then how is it calculated across the entire working class for you to say it's increasing. Median, average? Are we all sharing in that growth or only the top?

[–] [email protected] 15 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Serious question: are they up higher than inflation if you adjust for the last three years?

[–] [email protected] 29 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Yes, that's what real wages mean, adjusted for inflation

[–] [email protected] 7 points 11 months ago

Wage growth now is outpacing inflation, meaning we're going in the right direction. But if you compare over a few years, many people have fallen behind and have a lot of catching up to do.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I definitely agree with you about the data, but people's feelings do matter, that's why we're currently experiencing a vibecession.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

Why would people's feelings matter when the economy is actually good? The vibecession is literally a Conservative psyop

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

People's feelings affect how they act. Those actions, collectively, can have an impact on the economy (recession spending can cause a recession), politics (especially with elections in 6 months), and society in general. As they say, "perception creates reality."

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The entire stock market is based off investor's feelings so why shouldn't that also apply to the rest of the economy when market performance is a primary data point when measuring how the economy is doing?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

Why isn't the stock market down

[–] [email protected] 14 points 11 months ago

This is all about the disconnect between feelings and actual data. The question is how to get them back in sync. Some of that is time, but people will feel negatively as long as their media keeps telling them they are worse off.

For me it’s time. I know that be all objective measures I’m better off. It’s not just the overall stats but I got decent raises two years in a row. I still get hit with how bad inflation is. But a big part is that I stopped buying stuff for a couple of years. I cut back to really only make necessary purchases. Now that I have a little more available resources, and can make a few discretionary purchases, I’m hit by the last 4-5 years of inflation since I even looked. My comparison point is pre-COVID

[–] [email protected] 9 points 11 months ago (2 children)

My wage has not budged in four fucking years and no wages in Oklahoma have gone up if anything they going down.

My company will not give raises and I get paid more than any other person in my field and it isn't enough.

They literally offering jobs here at 12 an hour you be lucky to see 15 with bunch bullshit stipulations.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 11 months ago

I'm sorry that some states are shitholes, with shitty people trying to make them shittier. I live in one too.

Low taxes, but low benefits to its citizens, so people don't really want to live there. Poor healthcare, poor education, fewer opportunities for the arts and the things that make life worth livin'. It's a cycle of poverty and despair, and it's awful.

When I get money, I'm moving out. But I may never have enough money.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Cool, you're an outlier. Get out of here with anecdotes and come back with real data.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Come Oklahoma asshole better yet look up jobs here and see what they pay. It isn't shit. Not outliner go look at fucking jobs and what they pay. All the data you need is right there.

NO ONE IS PAYING A FUCKING LIVING WAGE. Homeless is going up everything is but fucking pay. So full of shit. Show your data and not from propaganda machine that is mainstream media.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 11 months ago

Tell me about it. It seems like no one looks at job postings to see what companies are actually hiring at.

If they do it's selective to their profession, or across highly educated professions. Then they can argue "well, git gud scrub." Completely ignoring how a gigantic portion of the population is stuck working those shit paying jobs.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago

Wage data doesn't come from the mainstream media you dope

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Consumer and credit card debt would like a word.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago (2 children)

People making bad decisions is being the scope of this discussion.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 11 months ago

Yeah, fixed doesn’t mean everything is better; it means things are on trajectory/no longer getting worse

People don’t understand the damage Trump did and how long it will take to undo it. It’s much longer than Biden’s second term

load more comments (1 replies)