this post was submitted on 18 Oct 2024
278 points (100.0% liked)

News

28765 readers
4439 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 105 points 6 months ago (4 children)

This just begs the question

Why do we allow a major embargo of an entire island nation and allow an entire people to live without the proper necessities and resources in order to maintain their nation?

[–] [email protected] 123 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

President Obama began to ease the embargo restrictions in 2016, allowing for travel and investments. It was Trump, in 2017, who reinstated the embargo in full. Probably just because Obama relaxed it.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Then Biden got into office and uh,

[–] [email protected] 45 points 6 months ago (3 children)

Hey, too close to election for me to not fervently call out misinformation bullshit like this:

It was The Trump Administration who signed the National Security Presidential Memorandum (NSPM-5)

National Security Presidential Memorandum (NSPM-5): Signed on June 16, 2017, this policy outlined the Trump administration's approach to rolling back aspects of the Cuba normalization process. It directed restrictions on travel, business dealings with Cuban entities controlled by the military, and restrictions on educational and cultural exchanges.

It was Donald Trump who directed the creation of the Cuba Restricted List

The U.S. Department of State, following Trump's directives, created a list of Cuban entities with which direct financial transactions are prohibited. This list largely includes businesses owned by or affiliated with the Cuban military, intelligence, or security services. It was first issued in November 2017 and has been updated several times since.

Has absolutely nothing to do with Biden or his administration. Get the fuck out of here with that bullshit.

[–] [email protected] 44 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I was more pointing out how Biden has done little or nothing to REVERSE Trump's regressions despite having the power to.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 6 months ago (5 children)

Oh good, let's blame the guy who didn't do something instead of the guy who did.

Has absolutely nothing to do with Biden or his administration. Get the fuck out of here with that bullshit.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 6 months ago

It's not about saying Biden is to blame. Trump 100% should have blame.

But the fact that someone else STARTED (or in this case re-started) a bad thing doesn't mean the next person in power gets a free pass for not working to stop it again.

So it's perfectly fair to call out Biden for not stopping the bad thing that Trump (re)started.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 6 months ago

Dude. Breathe. We're all on the same side, I'm certain.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Exactly! Not doing something to stop a problem is not the same as causing it. Also, if you don't vote for Harris you're voting for Trump.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago

False dichotomy.

You can blame more than one person at a time. You don’t have to pick one or the other to blame.

Also, straw man.

You made assumptions about the speaker that were never originally implied.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago

How convenient that the Democrats can act so powerless. If we don't like Republican policies, and Democrats won't change them, what's the point of voting Democrat?

[–] [email protected] 23 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I think he's implying Biden didn't roll back Trump's policy or try to begin normalization again.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

Oh good, let's blame the guy who didn't do something instead of the guy who did.

Has absolutely nothing to do with Biden or his administration. Get the fuck out of here with that bullshit.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 6 months ago (1 children)

No of course not why would the most powerful man on earth and former VP to the president who made that progress with Cuba have any responsibility to change anything.

He had the power and has not done it. It IS as bad as Trump's actions to uphold them.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago

The kid was already malnourished when I adopted it, you expect me to feed it properly?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago

You replied exactly the same ?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Biden isn't running anymore. You don't have to defend his unwillingness to roll back Trump policy anymore.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 6 months ago (1 children)

There's a shitton of Trump's policies that need reversing.

But, as always, it takes more time, effort and resources to build or fix something than it does to break them.

Biden's admin has been working through the heap, but some things take priority over others.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 months ago

Biden’s admin has been working through the heap, but some things take priority over others.

Particularly when it comes to foreign policy.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago

which one of his sponsors is profiting from the embargo?

[–] [email protected] 13 points 6 months ago

https://press.un.org/en/2023/ga12552.doc.htm

UN discussion on how damaging the embargo is

[–] [email protected] 14 points 6 months ago (2 children)

The US has an embargo, but Mexico and Canada don't. Cuba can and does buy goods from them. Cuba's real problem is paying for them. The US does not embargo food or medicine goods to Cuba, yet the country has problems feeding their people. Poor economic management of a communist country with no real resources.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Cuba can't pay because Cuba can't conduct normal finances with the rest of world because of the US embargo

It's like having having someone handcuff you, cuff you feet and pin you to the ground and rest their knee on your neck and ask you why you can't get up on your own.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 months ago (2 children)

They can certainly conduct commerce with the rest of the world.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

You are technically correct .... but there are several convoluted rules and regulations controlled and mandated by the US that it makes it either very difficult or impossible for most countries to do business or trade with Cuba.

Cuba can trade with anyone they want .... it's just purposely made so difficult that very few do so and the ones who do provide very little in exchange.

https://www.politifact.com/factchecks/2021/jul/19/facebook-posts/cuba-can-trade-other-countries-heres-some-context/

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago (1 children)

What I read in your link is not so much Political fact but a disagreement of experts.

What I read in your text is that trade is to difficult, however it is done.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago (3 children)

If you're a company why would you even fuck with more difficult trade.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 months ago (1 children)

The question is, with what currency? The Cuban dollar is not really worth anything outside Cuba, so they can only rely on exports to fund currency needed to buy imports.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

This is true, but not due to a US embargo. I should think that the state has access to many different currencies. But, in the end, they have limited resources. Cigars, some Rum (though a lot of countries distil and export rum in the Caribbean). They used to export mercenaries and doctors but noone is buying now.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

You don't think being explicitly barred access from what is essentially considered "the world currency" at this point wouldn't change their access? C'mon.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

They're not barred from access. Just can't use US banks. There are many banks in the world.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 months ago (1 children)

The world is run by the USD. If you can't do business using USD, it is crippling.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Hate to tell you this, but most banks in the world deal in multiple currencies including USD.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Do you know what the Petrodollar is? Have you ever seen USD called "the World's Reserve Currency"? There are reasons for this. The majority of world commerce is done using USD.

The US dollar has served as the world’s leading reserve currency since World War II. Today, the dollar represents 58 percent of the value of foreign reserve holdings worldwide. The euro, the second-most-used currency, comprises only 20 percent of foreign reserve holdings.

https://www.atlanticcouncil.org/programs/geoeconomics-center/dollar-dominance-monitor/

As the article goes on to say, Russia's invastion of Ukraine, and BRICS attempt to move away from USD toward other currencies like the Yuan, is changing the landscape as we speak.

But since 1963, or whenever the fuck it started, the USD has dominated. The act of simply not allowing a nation to participate in that, for such a long time, does a lot of damage. I think Cuba has done pretty well for itself, all things considered.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Yeah, I know what a petrodollar is. Played the oil spot market years ago. So, I'm guesstting you must be indicating that Cuba can't pay for oil. That's nonsense. Let's suppose they have their money at HSBC, a Chinese bank in Hong Kong. They make a deal for oil supply with Mexico. To pay for it, they have HSBC move money from Hong Kong to Mexico in USD.

BTW, I find the downvotes funny as he'll.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 months ago (1 children)

They're allowed to play monopoly, they just can't use the regular monopoly money.

The global economy is run on the US dollar. It's the measuring stick all other currencies use as a reference point.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago (4 children)

Again, world banks deal in multiple currencies.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 20 points 6 months ago (1 children)

The US has an embargo, but Mexico and Canada don't.

Technically, but the US has sanctioned companies in other countries who do business in Cuba scaring off a ton of possible choices. The companies have to choose between the richest company on earth and Cuba. Not much of a choice.

Plus IIRC boats that go to Cuba can't go to the US after for some period of time. Which considering location makes it hugely inconvenient for shipping companies.

Plus since the US and US based companies control a huge portion of the world's financial systems Cuba is locked out of all of them

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)

A citation is needed on the first paragraph

Barges float to Cuba from the US twice a week.

Last paragraph is true. Cuba cannot use US banking.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 6 months ago (1 children)

There are exceptions for the very few things the US authorizes to export to Cuba, but in general:

  1. What are the “180-day rule” and the “goods/passengers-on-board rule”?

The 180-day rule is a statutory restriction prohibiting any vessel that enters a port or place in Cuba to engage in the trade of goods or the purchase or provision of services there from entering any U.S. port for the purpose of loading or unloading freight for 180 days after leaving Cuba, unless authorized by OFAC. This restriction is applied even if a vessel has stopped in Cuba solely to purchase services unrelated to the trade of goods, such as planned ship maintenance.

https://ofac.treasury.gov/faqs/topic/1541

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

So you couldn't find anything. Nice

Really has nothing to do with article.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

Longest embargo in US history!

... probably done as a deterrent against other near by nations looking to station nuclear arms in close proximity.

Stops places like Mexico, Canada, or Panama from making an offer to China, Iran, North Korea, or Russia to station Nuclear their silos/launch bases for them.

Canada is probably still thinking about it though.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 6 months ago (3 children)

You can control a nation's ability to import and receive nuclear weapons, especially if you are trying to control the supply of arms ...... it doesn't mean you get to starve and decimate an entire country just because you don't like their politics or they don't happen to support you.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 months ago

doesn't mean you get to starve and decimate an entire country just because you don't like their politics

I think the history of the US and every other imperial power ever would disagree.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 months ago

So, while I would agree, politics has unfortunate side effects, both internal cuban politics, and external cuban politics, as the cuban exiles really, REALLY want to get all their shit back.

We shouldn't be in it, but our Cubans hijacked a large part of our politics by living in such a strong swing state, so we're at the mercy of them as much as anyone.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago

Unfortunately like so many things in this world the severity is the point.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 months ago

Canada is probably still thinking about it though.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 months ago

Because the people there didn’t allow US capitalists to exploit them and their resources; because the people started to organize themselves and their resources around public interest; because they were voting in leaders who didn’t allow US elite to exploit them.

And so they must be punished.