this post was submitted on 06 Apr 2024
374 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

68244 readers
4880 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 199 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Even worse, Reddit itself has been getting infected with corporate AI-generated "recommendations"

[–] [email protected] 117 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's really strange it's still at 47 dollars in the stock market. That thing is extreamly overvalued.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Market is irrational. Donald Social is trash garbage with no future, looks like it has a $5.5 billion market cap.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

$5.5B with a yearly revenue of $4 million and a loss of $58 million. Even if they had $0 in expenses, it'd still take a little under 1400 years to earn the equivalent of their market cap.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

At least the older posts seem to be okay.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You mean the ones where all the comments say [deleted]?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

It's like 1/10 or so of comments. Though it's fun seeing posts that have obviously been edited to advertise lemmy.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Except when it's like... "I bet that was the answer I needed, crap."

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

Not completely though. A while ago I've had a wave of these comments on a 3 year old post of mine. They got deleted after I've reported them at least, though I don't know if that action was done by a mod of the subreddit or site-wide admin.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

And its inaccessible to a lot of people now anyway.

[–] [email protected] 139 points 1 year ago (3 children)

That's why I use "site:reddit.com" instead of just adding "reddit"

[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Don't worry, I'm sure google will disable that soon in the same way they disable all the other search syntax that used to make searching a simple and easy task

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

"Search engine" is not equivalent to "Google".

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Cool, pedant. Addend "on google" to my comment then if you need, since that's clearly the context we're talking about here. I'm aware there are other search engines, but context should have made what I was talking about pretty fucking obvious.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

(Not OP) Point taken, but in that case the solution should also be obvious. Just use a different one that does provide that. If the product sucks, hit the bricks. DDG and Kagi are looking for market share, they'd love to have you.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago

Advanced search techniques should be a class in 6th grade

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

Or better yet, try my filter... It's "-site:reddit.com"!

[–] [email protected] 95 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Here's a tip:

site:reddit.com

[–] [email protected] 42 points 1 year ago

Or do this:

-site:reddit.com

[–] [email protected] 42 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Makes me sad to think that this will soon be about as useful as "site:facebook.com" with the way Reddit is going.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago

Yeah maybe giving corpo trash exclusivity over the sum total of human knowledge wasnt the best idea?

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Do you think it will ever be possible to do that for all the Lemmy instances?

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Pretty much all content gets federated to lemmy.world so if you use site:lemmy.world that'll do it.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago

If you look for something related to piracy, sadly it won't show.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago

Kagi.com has a lens for the fediverse. A lens is basically a scope within which performing the search.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Nah. The best option we have imo is a service that indexes everything on one site so traditional search engines can find it. That requires someone to build it, and AFAIK that's hasn't happened.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Lemmy's built-in search barely works as it is, so unless some drastic changes happen it's resounding no.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago

Web search engines don't rely on sites' built-in search features.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

This is how we found anything on reddit for most of its useful life. Its search was always garbage so we relied on Google to come up with usable results.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

It already works pretty well if you just add Lemmy to the search.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago

Okay but reddit is also becoming inaccessible; how to migrate this data?

[–] [email protected] 43 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I look forward to Google being forced to down rank any sites with “reddit” in the H1.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Google being forced to

What an odd phrase

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I’ve spent a lot of time working in SEO.

Search results like this can drive people away from Google and toward other resources. Google likes money, and this is why they usually try to combat spammers that are gaming the system.

It’s a cat and mouse game that has been happening for years. Organic search spammers find a new thing, then Google tweaks the algorithm to downrank what they’re exploiting.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 40 points 1 year ago (2 children)

As useful as Mozilla/5.0; AppleWebKit/537.36 (KHTML, like Gecko) Safari/537.3

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Mine is Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:109.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/115.0. Joke is, this is the trimmed version (about:config Xorigin and trimming settings) and some pages already have problems with it. If you strip out the OS part, pages like google.com won't work anymore. Despite that you shouldn't parse the UA string...

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago (3 children)

What browser agent is that?

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Trick is I took out the actually useful parts like Chrome, Firefox, Edge, etc. And the OS. All the agents these days have AppleWebKit and Mozilla just so old websites that look for it don't downgrade the experience.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

Yeah, make your user agent absolutely unique. Too much entropy will surely confuse the shit out server side HTTP Header tracking. 😬

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Firefox doesn't pretend to use AppleWebKit. It's actually the only one which identifies itself correctly... mostly, at least:

Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:122.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/122.0

While about:support says "Window Protocol: wayland". But that's ok websites shouldn't care anyway.

It's other browsers who send things like "like Gecko" to sneak past old browser-detection code.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 37 points 1 year ago

There's something very Darwinian, very artificial selection about this.

[–] MyNamesNotRobert 27 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I fucking hate seo abusers. I have to use a locally hosted ai for a lot of my "googling" because modern day search results are fucking worthless now.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago

Google also sneak "reddit" into the "People also ask" section.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago

site:reddit.com

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago

Am I the only one that wants to know more about this Japanese toaster you can fuck?

Surely I'm not alone here.

load more comments
view more: next ›