this post was submitted on 11 Apr 2024
66 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

9648 readers
544 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Related Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities

Sorted alphabetically by city name.


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL): incomplete

Football (CFL): incomplete

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Schools / Universities

Sorted by province, then by total full-time enrolment.


💵 Finance, Shopping, Sales


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social / Culture


Rules

  1. Keep the original title when submitting an article. You can put your own commentary in the body of the post or in the comment section.

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage: lemmy.ca


founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
all 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 50 points 1 year ago (6 children)

I'd love a housing crash. I get thats unpopular to owners, landlords and those that just but, but I'd like one.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago

Honestly, as someone looking to buy a house right now, I'd be fine with the market crashing afterward.

Of course, there would be unfortunate side-effects along with such a crash, but I'll gladly take a hit if it means affordable housing for Canadians.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

As a homeowner, it wouldnt be the end of the world if my home value went to zero (exaggerating here) but it meant my young coworkers could afford to buy a place.

I still have a place to live after all

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 year ago

As long as you don't have to renew your mortgage. Might be in trouble then

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago

According to the numbers, we need 3 solid crashes to normalize pricing.

Three.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

On one hand, it kind of needs to happen. Our economy as a whole is overleveraged on housing. On the other hand… A large proportion of our MPs are either landlords or reported housing related income, too, so why would they want things to change?

I’m in the unfortunate situation that I can’t possibly wait it out, for accessibility reasons. I’m utterly pissed off at the idea that I’m probably throwing way my life savings at a card castle that’s waiting to crumble. It’s just completely fucked up.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago

its completely ridiculous too from a value perspective. like really? 10 years ago this was 300k, what about it now makes it 1.3 lM? same with groceries I just don't believe that the prices are "real". I've seen a bunch of ads for toronto condos too, I feel like they're pumping a little too hard and it'll hit a breaking point. IDK, thats just the vibe i'm getting.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I bought at the peak for 750k and done close to jack shit and could sell for 1million. Bring on the fucking crash already.

It's not going to though. Too many factors driving the price up which the government is not addressing.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

That wasn't the peak if it's still going up

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I was just thinking "they obviously don't know what 'the peak' means."

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

They could be talking about the peak time for the rate of increase.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Peak? What peak? Every year is going toward this infinite peak 😅😭

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

I own, bring on a crash. It also strains me in how I can move about and what I can get next.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm not sure who this helps: the same buyers who want to buy a home can't save for retirement, either.

This seems like something being floated to a middle class that doesn't really exist any more.

Our governments are willing to do anything--anything--about housing except for building more of it directly, or punitatively taxing speculators and investors that hoard it. You know, the two things that would most help people. Or rather, would help people who aren't investors or developers.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

So true. This just allows you to give more of your money to a bank over your lifetime. People almost always end up spending as much as they possibly can on a house, usually because they're in competition with a big cohort with similar income in any given area. This will just raise prices as people can get bigger loans.

As a current homeowner, I'm ok with prices going down if more owner-occupiers are actually getting into the market (and ending up as owners not just tenants to the bank). But as long as speculators and corporations can sweep in and steal the deals these lame policies just feel like more corruption.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago

Doesn't this just free up more money for real estate? Like, now first time buyers will be able to pump more money into the housing market?

We need to be getting money out of real estate. Remove/lower the tax breaks for home ownership. Set a reasonable lifetime maximum for income tax deductions on sale of a primary residence. Just stop pouring gas on the fire.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

That RRSP change might be an even bigger deal - the cost of a down payment has been a major obstacle.