this post was submitted on 29 Apr 2024
1129 points (100.0% liked)

Political Memes

7701 readers
3590 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SouthEndSunset@lemm.ee 73 points 11 months ago (4 children)

Apart from anything else, why should teachers have to buy the tools to do their job?

[–] red_rising@lemmy.world 78 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Because for decades teaching has been marketed as ‘a calling’ not a job. People say things like, ‘teachers do what they have to’ or ‘no one goes into teaching for the money’ or ‘you might be the only person in some of these kids lives that care for them.’ These kind of phrases allow higher ups to continually slash teaching budgets while convincing teachers that they must fill the shortfall because of they don’t, who will? It’s bullshit.

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 32 points 11 months ago (3 children)

People are in for a rude awakening after republicans get rid of public schools. You think buying your own supplies is expensive — wait until you get the bill for going to private school.

[–] ceenote@lemmy.world 39 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

"Oh, you can't afford to send your child to school? Well the coal mines are always hiring if you need to get them out of the house."

[–] MrVilliam@lemmy.world 29 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Soon, an editorial headline:

Americans' bills are piling up; could chattel children be the answer?

[–] EldritchFeminity@lemmy.blahaj.zone 10 points 11 months ago

See also: Republicans have repealed child labor laws, but is that really a bad thing?

[–] this_1_is_mine@lemmy.world 12 points 11 months ago

It's because Republicans really like the unwashed masses they're easier to manipulate.

[–] zbyte64@awful.systems 5 points 11 months ago

Don't worry, we'll all be too busy reacting to actually take the time to reflect and learn something.

[–] SouthEndSunset@lemm.ee 3 points 11 months ago

Much like nurses in the U.K., and their current pay battles. There are even former nurses saying “they should do it for the love of the job”.

[–] Neato@ttrpg.network 16 points 11 months ago (1 children)

They shouldn't. Education is critically and routinely underfunded because dumb people vote conservative.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Num10ck@lemmy.world 12 points 11 months ago

rich neighborhoods often pay $200+ per student per year for supplies.

poor neighborhoods just get by without supplies

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] fine_sandy_bottom@discuss.tchncs.de 34 points 11 months ago (2 children)

This is just plain incorrect.

The law doesn't allow CEOs to write off yachts.

Whether or not regulators investigate them is another matter.

[–] dustyData@lemmy.world 11 points 11 months ago

That's why they don't own the yachts, but they own the charter companies that run the yachts.

[–] elxeno@lemm.ee 10 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Can't they just buy in the name of a company, which would be a 'business expense', which is kind of a write off?

[–] HydraulicMonkey@lemmy.world 11 points 11 months ago (7 children)

They would have to justify how it is a part of the companies operations. In theory at least.

So a private jet to fly your execs to business meets? Ok.

A yacht? Maybe for entertaining customers? I don't know about the US, but here in Australia entertainment expenses are written off at a lower rate than other business expenses.

[–] TheEighthDoctor@lemmy.world 4 points 11 months ago

A yacht can have meeting rooms, you can receive clients in these meeting rooms for business purposes, making it therefore a business expense.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] fine_sandy_bottom@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

It doesn't work like that. Expenses need to be "necessarily incurred in the course of producing income". Just be cause a company pays for something doesn't make it tax deductible.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SuckMyWang@lemmy.world 33 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The system working as intended

[–] SouthEndSunset@lemm.ee 6 points 11 months ago

Yup, not a bug, a feature.

[–] Davin@lemmy.world 29 points 11 months ago

The productive class vs the parasite class.

[–] reddig33@lemmy.world 23 points 11 months ago

Teachers shouldn’t have to buy their own supplies out of pocket to begin with.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 22 points 11 months ago

Teachers shouldn't be paying for teaching supplies in the first place.

[–] ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world 19 points 11 months ago (2 children)

I had a boss once who avoided paying taxes on his 49' sailing yacht by "donating" it to his church. It was then technically owned by the church (so no taxes, either transfer or property) but he still used it exclusively.

[–] JustZ@lemmy.world 26 points 11 months ago

You can probably report that to the IRS right now.

[–] uis@lemm.ee 6 points 11 months ago

Religious country

[–] phoneymouse@lemmy.world 16 points 11 months ago (1 children)

If I were a teacher, I would not buy school supplies with my own money.

[–] T00l_shed@lemmy.world 11 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The unfortunate part is that then kids in your class would be missing out on school supplies. It's not right for teachers to use their own money for school supplies though.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 15 points 11 months ago

Well, have a party or three with businesses clients on the yacht and you can write that off. However, I think the vast majority of people have their yachts registered under shell corporations, and that opens up a lot of opportunities for writeoffs.

[–] chemicalprophet@lemm.ee 8 points 11 months ago (2 children)

We need to normalize burning them.

[–] Exusia@lemmy.world 5 points 11 months ago (2 children)

The uh....the rich or the yachts?

[–] PostingPenguin@feddit.de 8 points 11 months ago

Both. Both are perfectly fine.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] stevedidwhat_infosec@infosec.pub 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

That makes sense. Cause further damage to the ecosystem in the waters and give the enemy ammunition towards painting real change makers as dangerous or destructive

👌🏻

[–] TheEighthDoctor@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

That makes sense. Cause further damage to the ecosystem in the waters and give the enemy ammunition towards painting real change makers as dangerous or destructive

It would still be a net positive for the environment tbh

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] HootinNHollerin@lemmy.world 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

super yachts need a hole drilled

Scuba gear and a drill

[–] JayleneSlide@lemmy.world 3 points 11 months ago

Scuba diver and sailor here. Above a certain size, boats have watertight bulkheads and pumps to remove water, like fire hose levels of water. May I suggest a thermal lance? Works great underwater, cuts through metal better than a drill, and can cut a slice long enough to cut past multiple bulkheads.

load more comments