this post was submitted on 02 May 2024
746 points (100.0% liked)

Not The Onion

15614 readers
2131 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Please also avoid duplicates.

Comments and post content must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 161 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (6 children)

A former quality auditor at Boeing supplier Spirit AeroSystems who turned whistleblower has died after a sudden illness, his family announced on Tuesday.

[…]

Dean's sudden death at the age of 45 was announced by his aunt and sister on social media on Tuesday. His mother wrote on Facebook that he had contracted pneumonia in April and suffered a stroke following an MSRA infection.

Let’s not turn into QAnon level conspiracy fuckwits here. He died of a natural illness as confirmed by his mother, and his family probably don’t want to have to deal with seeing everyone bringing him up in some deep state corpo assassination conspiracy bullshit.

You can hate Boeing for their shitty capitalist practices with resorting to this.

[–] [email protected] 153 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Agreed. It really looks like they only killed the one whistle blower.

[–] [email protected] 52 points 11 months ago

Yea. That first one was so obvious there's no way there's a way to kill someone and fool their mother. Case closed I'm satisfied...

[–] [email protected] 17 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I think the real take away is that there are so many people willing to speak out against Boeing's procedures that odds are some are going to die before the conclusion of this investigation.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 11 months ago

Imma need a dissertation on the probabilities here.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 11 months ago (2 children)

I like how you imply qa anon leaps and obvious deductive powers are the same.

[–] [email protected] 46 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (3 children)

Obvious deductive powers like not reading the article? Or do you think his mum was in on it too?

This article headline is written to push people to a conclusion. If it had simply added the word “illness” most people would not be “deducting” shit. It’s media manipulation to generate clicks and you’re falling for it.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 11 months ago

This article headline is written to push people to a conclusion.

Yes, the source article is from Newsweek, which is about as trustworthy as Boeing.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 11 months ago (1 children)

This article headline is written to push people to a conclusion.

This is becoming distressingly common.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 11 months ago

Because it works.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 10 points 11 months ago

Explain your point.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Deducing from headlines and circumstances while ignoring crucial information is exactly what QAnon does

[–] [email protected] 12 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Thinking it's possible a seedy thing happened =/= making up reams of bullshit based on a number in the background but sure everyone who disagrees with you is qanon

[–] [email protected] 6 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I intended to make it more like a cautionary tale. QAnon can happen to the best of us, and seedy thoughts that still consider that it was an illness for a while are sort of an entry point to the thought pattern behind conspiracy theories. If one builds tolerance to this kind of leap, it'll be easier to build tolerance for much bigger leaps.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago (2 children)

QAnon can happen to the best of us,

I don't agree. It happens to vulnerable people. And it's not like a disease you can catch if you're not vigilant. There are many steps to becoming bat shit, and wondering if a specific corporation would kill a person isn't something I'm willing to avoid because next thing I know I'd be trying to hang the vice president.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Everyone is vulnerable in one way or another. Of course, wondering is natural, but seriously accepting it, as some in this thread have done, is a QAnon kind of leap.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

some

Technically accurate that some have done that, but an exaggeration to consider it a trend

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago (14 children)

wondering if a specific corporation would kill a person

You have to realize how your first post came off. The poster you responded to clearly was talking about the people claiming Boeing did it. Of which there are plenty of this thread.

You then jumped in and said this wasn't conspiracy nonsense, but the result of "obvious deductive powers."

This did not come off as merely "wondering" or considering it a possibility, but as if you were saying it was an obvious fact.

I'm not even sure how to interpret that comment in relation to what you're saying now.

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 11 months ago
[–] [email protected] 7 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Okay, but in the interest of not pretending that They Would Never(tm) can we all agree that if a THIRD whistleblower dies shortly before or during testimony that maybe something is happening here? You have the guy who committed suicide in the middle of depositions after telling his friend "If I commit suicide, no I absolutely did not" and now the healthy 45 year old who all of a sudden has multiple infections and a stroke. Is there a point at which you'd accept the idea that it's a bit beyond coincidence that the deadliest place in the world seems to be the witness stand at a trial where Boeing is the defendant?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 11 months ago

You can give people infections on purpose. If he had died of a genetic heart defect it would be different.

[–] [email protected] 153 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

"Once is chance, twice is coincidence, three times is a pattern".

Alternatively...

"If I had a nickel for every Boeing whistle-blower that turned up dead recently, I'd have two nickels. Which isn't a lot, but it's weird that it's happened twice, right?"

[–] [email protected] 88 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (2 children)

There's no rest for Agent 747

[–] [email protected] 48 points 11 months ago (3 children)

The Seattle Times wrote that Dean "had been in good health and was noted for having a healthy lifestyle," but had died after contracting "a sudden, fast-spreading infection."

Agent 747 has some more sophisticated toys to play with this time. He must have upgraded after the last whistleblower.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 11 months ago

I mean, suiciding the guy who flat out told his friends "If I commit suicide no I didn't" shows that agent 747 was due to update his techniques and understanding.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 11 months ago

Can't kill them the same way, then it would be obvious.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago

Oh no don't tell me he got engine rot

[–] [email protected] 10 points 11 months ago

His name is Max.

[–] [email protected] 71 points 11 months ago

This seems a lot more like an unfortunate coincidence than the first whistleblower, unless Boeing have resorted to bioterrorism to get rid of their witnesses, but I'd hate to be part of Boeing's PR team right now - huge court case where the witnesses against you keep dying doesn't look good even if you had nothing to do with it.

[–] [email protected] 68 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I doubt during Boeing board meetings they are planning assassinations, but I have no doubt there's a wealthy investor or board member willing to kill to prevent losing money.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 11 months ago

Boeing does sell to the military.

[–] [email protected] 48 points 11 months ago (2 children)

His mother wrote on Facebook that he had contracted pneumonia in April and suffered a stroke following an MSRA infection.

I'd expect a very very through autopsy,

[–] [email protected] 21 points 11 months ago

And a blood panel so thorough his family knows everything he ate in the last month.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 11 months ago

I'd expect the body to mysteriously disappear before an autopsy can be performed...

[–] [email protected] 34 points 11 months ago

Fucking hell, why should anyone ever want to fly with Boeing again, if they need to pull this kind of mafia shit to cover up their crimes?

[–] [email protected] 32 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Is this whistle made of arsenic or something?

[–] [email protected] 15 points 11 months ago

Comes in an envelope with some lovely anthrax

[–] [email protected] 31 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Putin be like bump it down a notch Boeing.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 11 months ago

no one likes a copycat

[–] [email protected] 28 points 11 months ago

When you see in movies that the bad guy is bold AF and kills indiscriminately yet no-one seems to be doing nothing you think: meh, that is so unrealistic

yet here we are...

we just need a real life Liam Neeson that would kill all the bosses of Boeing, given that law is useless against the rich and powerful.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Lock up the executives this isn’t a coincidence

[–] [email protected] 26 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

Edit: yeah, they died very suddenly from an infection and stroke. It’s not like they had cancer or anything. So my contention is wrong in this case. Leaving my comment up to memorialize my mistake.

Original comment:

It appears they died from a “natural illness.” Before we go all conspiracy theory here let me remind everyone that a poor diagnosis sometimes LEADS to someone becoming a whistleblower. They are confronted with their own mortality and want to do some good before they go.

The death may not have been a result of the whistleblowing but may have been the cause of the whistleblowing.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago

Fair point, but damned if it isn’t suspicious.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 11 months ago

Could be coincidence or could be murder. Either way bad time to be a Boeing whistleblower

[–] [email protected] 13 points 11 months ago

"Hey how can we repair the recent damage to our reputation?"

"Murder somebody"

[–] [email protected] 9 points 11 months ago

I definitely would be wary of having having any business with this company. Seems like a hazard to health.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago

well thats weird

load more comments
view more: next ›