this post was submitted on 24 May 2024
1411 points (100.0% liked)

Lemmy Shitpost

30217 readers
3293 users here now

Welcome to Lemmy Shitpost. Here you can shitpost to your hearts content.

Anything and everything goes. Memes, Jokes, Vents and Banter. Though we still have to comply with lemmy.world instance rules. So behave!


Rules:

1. Be Respectful


Refrain from using harmful language pertaining to a protected characteristic: e.g. race, gender, sexuality, disability or religion.

Refrain from being argumentative when responding or commenting to posts/replies. Personal attacks are not welcome here.

...


2. No Illegal Content


Content that violates the law. Any post/comment found to be in breach of common law will be removed and given to the authorities if required.

That means:

-No promoting violence/threats against any individuals

-No CSA content or Revenge Porn

-No sharing private/personal information (Doxxing)

...


3. No Spam


Posting the same post, no matter the intent is against the rules.

-If you have posted content, please refrain from re-posting said content within this community.

-Do not spam posts with intent to harass, annoy, bully, advertise, scam or harm this community.

-No posting Scams/Advertisements/Phishing Links/IP Grabbers

-No Bots, Bots will be banned from the community.

...


4. No Porn/ExplicitContent


-Do not post explicit content. Lemmy.World is not the instance for NSFW content.

-Do not post Gore or Shock Content.

...


5. No Enciting Harassment,Brigading, Doxxing or Witch Hunts


-Do not Brigade other Communities

-No calls to action against other communities/users within Lemmy or outside of Lemmy.

-No Witch Hunts against users/communities.

-No content that harasses members within or outside of the community.

...


6. NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.


-Content that is NSFW should be behind NSFW tags.

-Content that might be distressing should be kept behind NSFW tags.

...

If you see content that is a breach of the rules, please flag and report the comment and a moderator will take action where they can.


Also check out:

Partnered Communities:

1.Memes

2.Lemmy Review

3.Mildly Infuriating

4.Lemmy Be Wholesome

5.No Stupid Questions

6.You Should Know

7.Comedy Heaven

8.Credible Defense

9.Ten Forward

10.LinuxMemes (Linux themed memes)


Reach out to

All communities included on the sidebar are to be made in compliance with the instance rules. Striker

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] LeFrog@discuss.tchncs.de 300 points 10 months ago (5 children)

There are also only two different animals: elephants and non-elephants.

[–] whodatdair@lemmy.blahaj.zone 131 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Anything unrelated to elephants is irrelephant.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] casmael@lemm.ee 68 points 10 months ago (4 children)

I think you are mistaken actually the different types of animal are frogs and not frogs

[–] itslilith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 62 points 10 months ago (5 children)

There are bullfrogs and elephant bulls, so we can conclude that {🐸}∩{🐘}⊂{🐂}

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] saigot@lemmy.ca 46 points 10 months ago (4 children)

Your both wrong there are crabs and then there are crabs 🦀🦀🦀🦀

[–] gregorum@lemm.ee 16 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)
[–] Shardikprime@lemmy.world 15 points 10 months ago

🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀 JAGEX SERVERS ARE POWERLESS AGAINST AUTH DELAY 🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀🦀

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] erie09@lemmy.world 18 points 10 months ago (3 children)

Are these elephants in the room right now?

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] justcallmelarry@lemmy.dbzer0.com 94 points 10 months ago (4 children)

Technically the existance of non-binaries also makes the binaries no longer binaries (due to increased optionality), so it would be fair to say everyone is non-binary

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] BilboBargains@lemmy.world 75 points 10 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] gmtom@lemmy.world 70 points 10 months ago (6 children)

There are only 2 numbers

  • 0/1
  • all the other numbers
[–] cows_are_underrated@feddit.de 27 points 10 months ago (10 children)

All the other numbers can be written wit 0/1

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] stanleytweedle@lemmy.world 63 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Feel like there's a Set Theory issue with this but I barely understand what little I can remember about it.

[–] pooberbee@lemmy.ml 38 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Does the gender of all non-self-containing genders contain itself? This is the fundamental question of gender theory.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] raynethackery@lemmy.world 48 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Whatever, just wash your hands.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 17 points 10 months ago (1 children)

And don't talk to me. I'd rather be surrounded by twelve "women" (i.e. trans men) in the men's room (or even just women) than one cis guy who insists on having a conversation with me.

I'm not there to make friends.

[–] Soulg@sh.itjust.works 14 points 10 months ago (5 children)

Never understood this. Standing at a urinal and someone walks up and starts talking to me, like no dude shut up

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 42 points 10 months ago (3 children)

What if I’m naan binary (preferably garlic)?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] CodexArcanum@lemmy.world 38 points 10 months ago (5 children)

If there already exists "a binary" then that says there are 2 states. "Non-binary" only means there are not-two-states. This could be unary (there is one kind of thing), trinary (there are now 3 things, the old 2 and new, secret 3rd thing), or really any n-ary set of n distinctly numbered things, so long as there aren't only exactly 2 of them.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 46 points 10 months ago (5 children)

“Non-binary” only means there are not-two-states.

The state of having two states and the state of not-having-two-states is itself a two-state solution.

Unfortunately, once you rule out non-binary as a third state, you collapse back into the original binary state. Thus, non-binary exists as a quantum superposition between states, as we fluctuate between whether or not being non-binary is politically correct.

[–] Zachariah@lemmy.world 22 points 10 months ago (5 children)

But can a two-state solution really work?

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] CodexArcanum@lemmy.world 16 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I want to upvote the OP for presenting an interesting discussion but downvote them for being wrong. This presents a case for a non-binary voting option.

A singular like button would still only express one portion of my sentiment. A third option could be many things, none are sufficient: a none or 0 or neutral option is effectively not voting, a sideways arrow or maybe state, or mixed state would express indecision or indeterminism rather than mixed feelings.

Therefore, I propose that a second positive-negative axis is required. The addition of these "sideways" arrows allow expressing 2 kinds of sentiment: towards the post content, and towards the poster themselves. I will not specify whether left or right is positive nor will i clarify which axis (x or y) corresponds to which kind of sentiment. I'm sure this undefined behavior will cause no problems.

Here is your composite vote in the new system: ↖️

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] TokenBoomer@lemmy.world 32 points 10 months ago
[–] postmanbrown@lemmings.world 31 points 10 months ago (2 children)

"If you choose not to decide you still have made a choice"

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] lowleveldata@programming.dev 28 points 10 months ago (5 children)

I always think there is a we vs them vibe in the non-binary thing which is kind of toxic

[–] bolexforsoup@lemmy.blahaj.zone 27 points 10 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

spoilerasdfasfasfasfas

[–] Talaraine@fedia.io 17 points 10 months ago (13 children)

That's so sad to me. From my POV being non-binary isn't aggressive. It's just that there are more important things to worry about than gender.

load more comments (13 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] altima_neo@lemmy.zip 27 points 10 months ago (5 children)
[–] S0UPernova@lemmy.world 26 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] chellomere@lemmy.world 17 points 10 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] gandalf_der_12te@discuss.tchncs.de 25 points 10 months ago

Nono you misunderstand. It's not "non-binary".

I'm calling myself enby, which is short for ein bisschen gay.

[–] veneficium@lemmy.blahaj.zone 24 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Reminds me of the: everything is either a duck or not a duck

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 30 points 10 months ago (2 children)

You'd think so, and yet...

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 16 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

Platypussoe ruin SO many assumptions, such as

  • mammals don't lay eggs
  • mammals aren't venomous
  • mammals don't have beaks/bills
  • beavers can't interbreed with ducks
  • a deity created the world and deities don't get drunk
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] inb4_FoundTheVegan@lemmy.world 22 points 10 months ago (3 children)

It's always hilarious and frustrating when people who don't understand a topic try to disprove it. This is the same energy as flat earthers pointing to the horizon and going "See!?!" or anti-vaxxers pointing out people who still get sick.

Anyone who thinks this logic is compelling should actually crack a book. I'd recommend Judith butlers gender trouble, but this sort of meme is peak dunning kruger. Literally too ignorant of a topic to actually argue against it.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] moon@lemmy.cafe 17 points 10 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] afraid_of_zombies@lemmy.world 16 points 10 months ago (8 children)

One day aliens are going to meet us and wonder what happened in our evolution that made us biased towards seeing every noun in groups of two, except for rules of nouns which are in groups of three.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] Resol@lemmy.world 16 points 10 months ago (15 children)

Genders in the Dutch language: common and neuter

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] amio@kbin.social 16 points 10 months ago (2 children)

"Troll logic" is one of my favorite memes.

Exactly like being hit by lightning at any instant has a 50% risk because either it happens or it doesn't.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] VantaBrandon@lemmy.world 14 points 10 months ago

My pronouns are infinite/recursion

load more comments