this post was submitted on 28 May 2024
169 points (100.0% liked)

politics

22829 readers
3443 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.world/post/15904702

"This was intentional," said U.S. Rep. Rashida Tlaib. "You don't accidentally kill massive amounts of children and their families over and over again and get to say, 'It was a mistake.'"

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] reddwarf@feddit.nl 52 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I will make this statement once more as I see people defending the bombing of Palestinians because of various reasons. I will not go into these reasons as they matter zero to my statement. Here it is:

You do not bomb your way through children to get at your target. Hitler, Pol Pot, Mao and Stalin could be hiding amongst or beneath, you Do Not Bomb Your Way Through Children.

This is a simple fact and if you cannot agree with this then in my mind you are despicable and a monster. Vaporizing children into a red mist will never solve your problems. Past transgressions of your enemy does not change this simple fact. It really is that simple.

Yet I feel people here seem to forget this simple rule. Disgusting.

[–] ytg@sopuli.xyz 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Are there people on Lemmy defending the bombing of Palestinians because of various reasons?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] jimmydoreisalefty@lemmy.world 37 points 10 months ago (1 children)

"This was intentional. You don't accidentally kill massive amounts of children and their families over and over again and get to say, 'It was a mistake,'" U.S. Congresswoman Rashida Tlaib (D-Mich.) said in a social media post to President Joe Biden. "Genocidal maniac Netanyahu told us he wants to ethically cleanse Palestinians. When are you going to believe him, POTUS?"

Despite these staggering casualties—and Israel's forced displacement, starvation, and deprivation of millions of Gazans—the United States continues to support its top Middle Eastern ally with billions of dollars in arms and with diplomatic and political support including United Nations Security Council vetoes and genocide denial.

"How many times are we going to hear, it was a 'mistake' before we take serious action against Netanyahu?" U.S. Congresswoman Delia Ramirez (D-Ill.) asked. "How does anyone justify his administration? Every single moment that we supply arms, send money, and make excuses makes us absolutely complicit in his barbaric war of death against Palestinians. Enough!"

"Biden's backing of Netanyahu's war is rooted in a hierarchy of human value, an empathy gap that perpetuates suffering, violence, and distrust," he added. "Cutting off American weapons is the only way to isolate Netanyahu to prevent further killing of women and children in what has become the largest slaughter of Palestinian civilians since Israel's founding in 1948."

[–] JustZ@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Who actually backs Netanyahu, though? Not Biden. America should back Israel generally and that idea is uncontroversial in Washington.

[–] jimmydoreisalefty@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

Biden's actions would beg to differ...

America should back Israel generally and that idea is uncontroversial in Washington.

That is true, the duopoly is bought and paid for, AIPAC is really good in investing in politicians that will follow their bidding!

[–] Ultraviolet@lemmy.world 10 points 10 months ago

Oh, a mistake, I see. We all make them, I spilled my coffee this morning, Netanyahu murdered 50 civilians and put 200 in the hospital, completely understandable. /s

[–] JustZ@lemmy.world 7 points 10 months ago (8 children)

I find the hysteria over the the top. Like, they targeted and killed two Hamas commanders. So when the article quotes someone saying they targeted civilians in tents, that should be called out as a lie.

Seems like the airstrike caused some flammable materials to catch fire and it spread to the tents. The resultant fire was obviously not intentional.

Hey, maybe don't make camp with Hamas commanders? Maybe point them out on day one of the war so everyone can go back home? This should have been over in November.

[–] SulaymanF@lemmy.world 27 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Nonsense. Israel is claiming there were Hamas commanders responsible for recent West Bank attacks hiding under the tents. How is that possible when Gaza has been sealed and blockaded since 2007? And how are Hamas commanders allegedly in a land cleared by the IDF and in a “safe zone” the IDF told civilians to move to?

The IDF has a miserable track record of being proved to be lying by reporters over and over and over again, and even this claim strains credibility.

[–] JustZ@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I think Israeli and Western intelligence knows better than you, and more importantly, they have more credibility than Hamas and Hamas loyalists, whose job it is to exaggerate and lie. Want to talk about straining credibility? Let's talk about how nobody who died in air strikes is ever a Hamas members, there's hundreds of miles of tunnels in a tiny little area and Hamas loyalists pretend they don't know where they are, pretend they have no idea who is launching thousands of rockets day after day. Give me a break. The IDF on the other hand, actually has a track record of arresting and prosecuting war criminals within their own ranks. Hamas has a track record of giving them cash prizes.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 9 points 10 months ago

Western Intelligence graded the Israeli claims as bullshit. The White House has been ignoring their own reports for months now.

[–] SulaymanF@lemmy.world 8 points 10 months ago (1 children)

lol, so Netanyahu isn’t an extremist who was caught lying multiple times about the existence of Hamas command centers under multiple buildings. You think it’s more likely he’s guided by intelligence reports over his actual ideology or his political and personal motivation to prolong a war to avoid jail time once he’s out of office for corruption?

Western Intelligence hasn’t backed up this claim so stop hiding behind them as if that absolves the crime.

Go ahead and show me IDF prosecuting war criminals in their ranks. I’ll wait. Despite the White House telling the Israeli government which specific divisions committed documented crimes this year alone, there hasn’t been any prosecutions. And I’m not talking about a single case but the hundreds of documented episodes on video of Israeli soldiers supporting pogroms in West Bank. Russia literally prosecuted more pogrom perpetrators than Israel has despite the video proof and more witnesses.

[–] JustZ@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (2 children)

Go ahead and show me IDF prosecuting war criminals in their ranks.

You're absolutely brainwashed. They cite to this fact in the ICJ opinion on the preliminary application. It's widely reported.

[–] SulaymanF@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Ah so you couldn’t show any. Got it.

Or do you mean when IDF sentenced an Israeli to 3 months of community service as punishment for murdering a Palestinian, you think that counts as sufficient prosecution?

[–] JustZ@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

Personally, doesn't sound like it. You're defending Palestine, though. Where nobody ever gets prosecuted for war crimes at all. Instead, they are paid cash.

[–] NoIWontPickAName@kbin.earth 3 points 10 months ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] FourPacketsOfPeanuts@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

And how are Hamas commanders allegedly in a land cleared by the IDF and in a “safe zone” the IDF told civilians to move to?

I refer you to every guerrilla war ever.

[–] jimmydoreisalefty@lemmy.world 21 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

I find the hysteria over the the top. Like, they targeted and killed two Hamas commanders. So when the article quotes someone saying they targeted civilians in tents, that should be called out as a lie.

It might not be big news for you, but once you see the same military speak and narrative over and over again, you start to question and become more criticial of what they say vs. what is closer to the truth.

Reminds me of some other wars, where we droned many civilians, 'but we were targeting terrorists" line is also used to a certain degree.

Which war and whistleblower released the info on the closer to real data of civilian death vs. military reported civilan deaths...Iraq, Iran, Syria, Yemen, Afghanistan, Somalia, or Pakistan.

The Iraq War documents leak is the disclosure to WikiLeaks of 391,832 United States Army field reports, also called the Iraq War Logs, of the Iraq War from 2004 to 2009 and published on the Internet on 22 October 2010. The files record 66,081 civilian deaths out of 109,000 recorded deaths.

Seems like the airstrike caused some flammable materials to catch fire and it spread to the tents. The resultant fire was obviously not intentional.

That may be true, but when you see Israeli talking points in legacy media, they make sure to always bring up how much effort they put into keeping the civilan death count to the minimum. They do not release any of the data on this though, only on the 'Hamas' terrorist death count.

Hey, maybe don’t make camp with Hamas commanders? Maybe point them out on day one of the war so everyone can go back home? This should have been over in November.

Have you heard of Guerrilla warfare? Our gov't and military has a lot of experience with this type of warfare, but if you look at the data, it seems to only increase terrorists due to them spreading out and, due to civilian deaths, it tends to increase terrorism due to martyrs and revenge for family/friends.

Guerrilla warfare is a form of unconventional warfare in which small groups of irregular military, such as rebels, partisans, paramilitary personnel or armed civilians including recruited children, use ambushes, sabotage, terrorism, raids, petty warfare or hit-and-run tactics in a rebellion, in a violent conflict, in a war or in a civil war to fight against regular military, police or rival insurgent forces.

I hope this has helped you see a different point of view, I would suggest to read about the US wars we have been a part of for around a couple of decades.

You may read military and legacy media data on the wars, then look at the leaked information to contrast and compare the information.

Feel free to share that information [with] us as well!

Let us keep talking to people we do not agree with or think like we do!

[–] JustZ@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago

Literally just excuses for the consequences of Palestine's own actions and choices. Nobody cares less about the people of Gaza than Hamas, except maybe Iran.

[–] NoIWontPickAName@kbin.earth 15 points 10 months ago (2 children)

The difference between “ the most moral army in the world” and the rest of us is that they are willing to kill children.

Are you?

[–] JustZ@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

I'm not willing to let terrorists dictate the terms of war because they are so deranged they let their own kids die, and be proud about it. So yes if there are, terrorists or tunnels there, all that's required is a reasonable attempt to warn. People want to take their kids with them that's up to them. I'm not willing to see another generation of Palestinians die hopeless under a theocratic dictatorship that only retains power by terror financing from Iran and the charity from the West, which prevents the Palestinian people from realizing how shitty their chosen leadership it.

[–] NoIWontPickAName@kbin.earth 8 points 10 months ago (1 children)

So yes or no, you are ok with someone killing children to get what they want?

[–] JustZ@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Have you heard of a thing called depth or nuance? Not everything is as simple as one sentence.

Kids always die in wars. Does that mean war is never moral? No. I'm not okay with kids getting bombed. Their parents and community should heed the warnings instead of supporting terrorists. 99.3% of Palestinians are managing not to get blown up while hanging out with Hamas commanders.

[–] NoIWontPickAName@kbin.earth 7 points 10 months ago (12 children)

My point is, if you have decided to pull the trigger, knowing you’re gonna kill a kid, I hope you die a painful death and no longer care what you think.

It’s just tragic coincidence after tragic coincidence after tragic coincidence.

At what point do you stop believing these are accidents?

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] FourPacketsOfPeanuts@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Would I bomb a proven terrorist who is known to be plotting the deaths of more children even if he's surrounded by his family? Yes, unfortunately.

This isn't a "who likes killing children" competition. It's a really shitty trolley dilemma where inaction means letting killers continue to plot their next campaign targeting women and children

If leaving them alone meant you didn't know if their next target was your kids school, or your wife's place of work, or your parents retirement village, would you press the button on them or not?

[–] NoIWontPickAName@kbin.earth 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

What if he was surrounded by your family? Would you still do it then?

That’s the price that you are asking others to pay for your war

[–] FourPacketsOfPeanuts@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

You're right, I wouldn't. But you must realise trolley dilemmas are shit for exactly this reason. It exposes the fact that, at the end of the day, yes, we will prioritise our own children over someone else's. What people don't seem to acknowledge is that this is the choice presented to Israel. People act like the choice is "kill children or don't kill children" as if it's that black and white and crude. When it's really "kill Hamas now with collateral damage or wait for the next time they deliberately target women, children, babies". They're the actual two tracks to choose between. I don't blame Israel for killing Hamas wherever they find them and not accepting their cowardly attempt to use their relatives as shields.

[–] Kben@kbin.social 15 points 10 months ago (1 children)

You find the hysteria over the top? Over 30,000 innocent people have been slaughtered and your reaction is "but hamas" This is one of countless war crimes commited by this genoicidal state and reponding with "what about the other side" is quite frankly abhorent.

[–] Rekorse@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 10 months ago

I think what is going on here is that this person would have to admit america has committed awful and repeated war crimes over the years, just like Israel is now.

You can tell because they use Americas past wars/incidents as a standard to compare against.

Their position is so unpopular here because most people here would never hold up America as a standard for international relations, unless to illustrate what NOT to do.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 14 points 10 months ago (1 children)

LMAO no. You don't bomb refugees to get an HVT. This is the use case for special forces. They exist for stuff like this in asymmetrical operations purely because we all agree to be bound by rules in war. That's why this is called a war crime, no matter who they were "targeting".

[–] JustZ@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

I suppose if your media diet consists of Qatari state media and fundraising solicitations, as yours does, you would think that. In reality, commanders and tunnels are fair and morally just military targets under uncontroversial rules of war. And, if there's a reasonable effort to notify civilians to leave the area, that's all international law requires. Period everything you suggest above and beyond that is just your wish, and also ignores the fact that the tunnel warfare in Gaza is unprecedented in world history. If people don't leave after the warnings, that's on them. 99.3% of all Palestinians managing to get along without being killed standing near tunnel shafts, standing next to Hamas members. That's the asymmetry I care about. That's why I find these reactions over the top and hysterical. Especially when your counterproposal is to let generations, millions more Palestinians, live and die without ever knowing hope, under the physical and mental shackles of Hamas/panislamist leadership. I'm not concerned about the 0.7% who can't seem to stay away from Hamas. The only thing they are victims of is radical pan-Islamist plot to use their deaths to weaken western military and political power in the region.

They think they're going to restore Islam to its "rightful place in the world," which is code for a theocratic Islamic dictatorship ruling over hundreds of millions of people as well as killing every Jew in israel. The only rightful place in the world for Islamic government is in the trash bin, and aside from that it's never going to happen as long as western governments remain generally committed to democratic ideals.

I understand the news is very sad. Maybe your efforts would be better spent convincing the Palestinian people to tell Hamas to wear uniforms.and stop hiding under hospitals and houses, if they're going to complain that 0.7% of them were indistinguishable, if they're going to cry victim and wield international custom of war as a shield. Nah, they won't do that, because they literally want their kids to be in harm's way; their greatest ambition, under Hamas, is to die in a way that makes you sad.

[–] FourPacketsOfPeanuts@lemmy.world 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

While I agree with what you say, you must realise it's not in Hamas' interest to advertise to people around them exactly who they are? They rely on people not fleeing. Some are family members, yes. But others? They probably have no idea a senior commander is two tents over from them.

[–] JustZ@lemmy.world 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

That's true. I do understand that. In my view, it is willful blindness. You cannot stick your head in the sand and claim ignorance.

The truth of the matter is that the only reason a particular family might not know is because so many other Palestinians are providing cover and support for Hamas.

Every family in Gaza may not know a particular commander, they still know the Hamas people from their neighborhood, know where there's a tunnel shaft or two. With even slight cooperation, combined with Israeli intelligence, Hamas would already be gone and we'd be talking about a pretty tame reconstruction, instead we're talking about a fire in a refugee camp, and a reconstruction that will could take a decade. That's the moral hazard of starting a war, it has to end somehow.

[–] SuckMyWang@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Thanks for the clarification. I didn’t see this info in the 15-20 posts before for some strange reason. And yes this info matters a lot. It’s very different from the constant Israel is indiscriminately slaughtering Palestinian babies in camps as part of a genocide.

[–] JustZ@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

The details are right in the article, just buried between hysteria and wild speculation.

[–] slurpinderpin@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Yeah unfortunately when Hamas surrounds themselves with civilians, this stuff happens. It’s what they’ve been doing this entire war. They’re cowards

[–] SulaymanF@lemmy.world 11 points 10 months ago (2 children)

IDF’s headquarters is in a civilian neighborhood in Tel Aviv. Why does IDF surround itself with civilians? By Israel’s logic, is Tel Aviv now a valid target?

[–] slurpinderpin@lemmy.world 3 points 10 months ago

I would say yes, it is

[–] AngryCommieKender@lemmy.world 2 points 10 months ago

Tel Aviv and Jerusalem. Hell, by Israel's "logic", Palestine should be killing about 600,000 Israelies in return for the 35,000 dead Palestinians.

load more comments