this post was submitted on 28 Jun 2023
169 points (92.0% liked)

Lemmy NSFW

12517 readers
6 users here now

Updates about lemmynsfw.com

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
169
submitted 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) by gavi to c/lemmynsfw
 

Both host content that are against our content policy and have had issues with users from those sites entering our community crossposting content that violates our content policy. We are discussing defederating other instances as well. There is discussion of lemmit.online being defederated because it pretty much exclusively scrapes reddit content and reposts it, and some content creators have expressed discomfort. If there's other instances that might be worth considering defederating from, just post and it'll be added to the current discussion.

and before anyone brings it up, lemmygrad defederated with us.

This isn't a dictatorship but I ask that you please behave in the comment section and at least try to understand why we are defederating.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Quirful 64 points 2 years ago (4 children)

I think defederating instances that post illegal content makes sense, as the admins are responsible for the content on their server.

I think defederating instances that host belligerent users and content makes sense, because it protects those that are targeted by them.

I don't think defederating instances that post content some people don't want to see makes sense, a la Lemmit. If the admins want to go that far, you might as well close off the entire fediverse and only host content at your personal approval. Dunno why you'd need a Lemmy instance for that.

[–] rvdn 11 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Exploding-heads was defederated by lemmy.world due nazi content afaik, which itself is illegal in many countries, and targets minorities.

Am I missing something?

Edit: or you are talking only about lemmit.online?

[–] Quirful 14 points 2 years ago

My last point is talking about instances like Lemmit, hence why I mentioned it specifically.

[–] gavi 8 points 2 years ago

Lemmit was at the topic of discussion and I was desiring input by putting that in there. We are discussing it, but we are leaning against defederating it as it wouldn't make sense to. Someone just brought it up and I wanted public input.

[–] Barbarian@sh.itjust.works 5 points 2 years ago

If you block the lemmit bot, it's like blocking the whole instance as it's the same "user" that does all the posting across all communities on that instance. They really have made it really easy for users to not see lemmit if they don't want to, and I appreciate that.

[–] DreamDrifter 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It's not just content though, essentially it's bots.

The problem with bots isn't just spam, a social network is defined by the interaction among the community...I think that's a fair call.

I might be up for having unscripted LLMs on the network, but repost bots are like a weird smell... It's not that big a deal individually, but it'll make the community noticably worse

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Nubbly_The_Moist 31 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I dont like the idea of defederation, but I understand your justifications for these specific instances.

I find the idea of defederating lemmit.online an odd one. Is there a legal reason to do this? Or is it just because you don't want users of our instance to see reddit content? I don't quite understand the justification here. (I personally just have their communities blocked)

[–] gavi 11 points 2 years ago (1 children)

It was a topic of discussion I wanted community input from as someone brought it up. We are leaning against defederation of it currently.

[–] freezeandpixillate 8 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Hey, I'm new here but I think keeping lemmit federated will help me smooth over the transition from reddit. The majority of all content on Reddit and Lemmy (including this very instance) is already reposted from some other sources anyway and I don't really see a reason to treat automated reposting differently from manual.

[–] remotelove@lemmy.world 3 points 2 years ago

Everything is basically a repost from somewhere anyway.

There are some benefits to doing some Reddit scraping and there are some really shitty ways that it could happen as well.

It would be great if news and or other world events were auto-posted is my first thought. /r/CombatFootage -> /c/CombatFootage would be awesome! Subject matter aside, news needs quick propagation.

Floods of screenshots of Reddit posts would be on the shitty end of this, me thinks.

[–] mythirdaccount 29 points 2 years ago

Thanks good exploding heads is defederated

[–] ReallyActuallyFrankenstein 25 points 2 years ago

This all sounds very reasonable, keep it up.

[–] MikeyMongol 24 points 2 years ago

And nothing of value was lost.

[–] xiaoyang4 17 points 2 years ago (2 children)

IDK if this is a hot take, but personally I think the only reason to defederate should be for content policy.

Otherwise, it should be up to individual users to block communities that they don't want to see.

[–] gavi 28 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

When it comes to hosting a community like this that hands off policy when it comes to communities that reddit did for a time is not something we can repeat. I generally disagree with such community building ethos in general, but for a NSFW community that's trying not to implode the high probability that exploding-heads would cause issues serious issues against minority sexual communities here in the same way they have on other instances is not something I feel we can risk. Even more so, their content is poorly moderated in general and we aren't too sure where we are going to move hosts either. On instances that decided the same approach you feel, it has backfired hard when they have raided communities and began to harass and brigade people. Such cases are recent as well. I'd have to double check the modlog but I'm pretty sure they've already caused issues here as well on a consistent basis.

TL;DR: I don't want to set myself up to having to clean up a bunch of gore and NSFL images being posted into communities on here.

This is reactive, not just proactive. The history of exploding-heads is known.

[–] xiaoyang4 10 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

I think it's absolutely valid to defederate if the users from a particular instance have a propensity to violate the content policy here.

For communication purposes, I think it's important to clarify and emphasize that this is the case and it's not done for political reasons. Maybe I'm overly paranoid, but I always feel as though this is a slippery slope (e.g. defederating from the socialist instance, or the trans/lgbt instance). Personally, for transparency's sake, I think it's better to avoid giving the impression that admins defederate from instances that they simply dislike. IMO, the defederation process should go by a process that is clearly defined and a published policies/rules.

[–] taladar 7 points 2 years ago

As with any moderation efforts if you publish some clear, limited rules about it trolls will find a way to technically not violate the rules and yet still be obnoxious in some way and then point to the rules to claim you can't defederate, ban,... them because they didn't violate your published rules.

[–] PayNoMind 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I'll counter with the point that there's nothing preventing someone from moving to another instance if they don't like the defederation practices of the one they're on.

There's sure to be at least one that doesn't care to defederate from anyone and/or one that only does so under the most severe circumstances. Worst case if you can not find one that suits your positions on defederation you can always start up your own.

Personally I'm inclined to think of the people in control of the federation keys as bouncers, keeping me from having to deal with the unsightly/undesirable/what have you.

If every time you go to (neighboring town) someone shoots at your tires, you stop going, right? But those (neighborhood town)ers really like shooting your tires so when you stop showing up, they come looking for you. How are you supposed to keep them away? But everyone's threshold is different. Some people may not mind their tires being shot at, those (neighboring town)ers are just expressing their freedoms. Others are uncomfortable with their tires being looked at weird. It doesn't make any part of the spectrum right or wrong, but different people have different wants and needs. It's no more fair for you to expect others to deal with their tires getting weird looks than it is for them to prevent you from getting yours shot.

That's how the splintering can be best for everyone. No one is forced anywhere they don't want to be. Whether an instance defederates too much or too little for you, you can pick up and move with very little effort.

[–] xiaoyang4 4 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

This is certainly true, but I have a more pessimistic view that this type of fragmenting dooms this type of fediverse model from ever becoming mainstream. If every interest group splinters, eventually they're all small enough that they lack the weight to build momentum, as well as the resources to sustain the community long-term. We can see this in the mastodon nsfw instances (a bunch of them shut down), and IMO that's the inevitable fate of any small instance that lacks the numbers (read: financial support) to support a durable operation.

[–] asentientai 11 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I don't think you're a dictatorship but I have no clue what burgitt, lemmygrad, or exploding-heads are.

[–] gavi 29 points 2 years ago (2 children)

burgitt hosts loli/shota/etc exploding-heads are an alt right instance that is very poorly moderated lemmygrad are a tankie instance (their own description, not mine.) lemmy.ml I believe defed-ed us as well which is their right to. I am unsure about kbin.social. I tried to contact kbin.social admins but I am unsure where to.

[–] asentientai 15 points 2 years ago

Aha, thanks for letting me know. Based on those descriptions I support that defederation as a lemmynsfw user. Keep up the good work!

[–] Edwardrotik 4 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Fwiw, exploding is asking for mods for other content. Dunno if that's legit or not, but it might mean an end to or reduction in the fuckery at least.

[–] gavi 6 points 2 years ago

One can only hope. Not holding my breath though.

[–] StarNyte 14 points 2 years ago (1 children)

burggit - loli/shota

lemmygrad - commies

exploding heads - nazis

[–] gavi 32 points 2 years ago (15 children)

slight correction, not commies but tankies specifically

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] nsfwaccount411 10 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

Question: If moderations tools improve and allow, say, communities from certain instances to [edit: NOT] show up on "All"/"Communities", will it be possible to re-federate instances that allow some communities that are against the content policy?

Most (but not all) of the banned content on here is straight up illegal so it's not such a huge deal ATM, but (for example, as this is the most obvious "not-illegal-but-still-banned" content I can think of) anyone into CNC can't subscribe to it here (fair) but also can't subscribe to an external CNC community either. This may become a bigger problem as the Content Policy expands (as an extreme example, I've seen people call for the ban of ALL non-original content, which would be great for ethics but would basically require disabling federation altogether).

EDIT: oof, even hentai cnc is banned. I've expanded further down the thread, but from a user's perspective this really sucks because a lot of stuff that is well in the clear on reddit (sissy*, incest*, *dom, etc.) is potentially banned if we're going to have a fictional consent police. While I understand the admins' concerns, from a user perspective the current policy is already much harsher than any website I've ever been on that allowed porn.

Also is it even practical/sustainable to police things like fictional consent? Reddit doesn't not do it because they like it, they don't do it because it's unenforceable. Their rules are made to be unambiguous and easily applied: don't post underage stuff (duh), no revenge porn, no deepfakes, no illegal stuff. By saying "no noncon", this opens up so many edge cases that I don't think that they can be ruled on fairly. Is incest noncon? Is hypno porn? What about femdom? Bondage? That one scene from Blade Runner 1982?

[–] cap 4 points 2 years ago (3 children)

This is off topic to your point but lets say, hypothetically, my friend was interested in a CNC-allowed instance, would you have any recommendations?

[–] nsfwaccount411 7 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (4 children)

I don't think there is one. At least going from the fact that I don't see many federated nsfw instances here at all, but maybe I haven't looked hard enough.

Tbh the legal and practical ramifications of hosting porn (particularly the borderline-legal kind) means that this is probably not going to be easy to get going for anyone living in a western country. I wouldn't get my hopes up too much for your friend.

EDIT: There's not. That's a real shame because even drawn CNC is verboten now, and I've had an incest caption removed today (no reason provided, but I'm assuming that since IRL incest is non-consensual by definition then it might be (partially?) verboten as a fictional kink as well).
I know I will hold off on contributing here for now until the content policy stops getting expanded every week. I had assumed "reddit-like" rules would apply, but they're already significantly stricter and there's no point in submitting niche content that will get removed down the line.

I mean, I get it from the admins' perspective. But from a user/contributor's perspective I really really hope they can figure out a way that we can still aggregate content that was previously allowed on reddit, else I hardly see the point of migrating.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] gavi 3 points 2 years ago

It should be denoted the strict content policy currently in place is going to be discussed further at a later date. CNC will likely be a topic of discussion on how to approach that. The strict content policy right now is more or less a temporary "pause" while lemmy as a software itself improves and more tools become at our disposal.

[–] Ganbat 10 points 2 years ago

Lemmit is just a frontend for Reddit's RSS feeds.

[–] echoct 6 points 2 years ago

Glad to hear it. Good choice to ditch both.

[–] zebra 6 points 2 years ago

Thanks for the update, thats great news! ☺️ Been waiting for a while for this defederation to occur.

[–] LatinVelvet 6 points 2 years ago

Completely agree with this decision.

[–] Bandeau 5 points 2 years ago

Defederated with burgitt.moe and exploding-heads

I didn't know he existed until he didn't.

load more comments