this post was submitted on 20 Jun 2024
345 points (100.0% liked)

politics

22161 readers
3053 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 146 points 9 months ago (3 children)

I had to travel to Austin for work a few weeks ago. Got off the plane, checked into the hotel, took a shower, decided to use mother nature’s melatonin to help with the jet lag… then, boom. Upload your driver’s license.

So I had visited some sites that were hosted outside US and didn’t give a fuck about Texas’ stupid laws.

These laws are not only authoritarian, they’re fucking useless.

[–] [email protected] 61 points 9 months ago (4 children)

I assume this is the "small government" party doing this?

(I'm not an American)

[–] [email protected] 16 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Yes. They want "small government" when the law affects them, but "law and order" when it punishes someone else who annoys them.

It's childishness we've come to be accustomed to, thanks to lead-brained 70-year-olds who are falling into legit cognitive decline... but still have the numbers to be a formidable opponent at the polls on election day.

Also, their dicks don't work anymore without a blue pill, so they may as well take away the consensual naked fun of Gen X, Millennial, and Gen Z (18+) people right?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago

Small so it can sneak into all their citizen's lives.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 47 points 9 months ago (1 children)

What's worse: Reputable sites that comply with U.S. laws (such as participants being 18+ and filming of their own free will) are effectively forced out, while questionable site carry on.

The likelyhood of seeing abuse victims or underage in Texas goes up, not down.

If they truly cared about protecting minors, they'd see the flaw in their law and rectify it. Of course, we all know (not through cynicism but cold repeated behavior) that political conservatives do not care about minors and care far more about punishing consenting adults.

This law is a step toward the latter.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 9 months ago

You: (bring facts and logic)

TX Republicans: "A witch! They're a witch! Burn them!"

[–] [email protected] 8 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (7 children)

In any given situation, sites beholden to these laws are much less likely to be hosting CSAM

Edit: Literally why the fuck are all of you reading this wrong????

[–] [email protected] 22 points 9 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 19 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Other way around:

Sites that COMPLY with laws and exit the state leave behind sites that do not comply.

The sites you CAN reach in Texas are more likely to have trafficking victims and underage participants -- because those sites clearly don't give a hoot about laws.

Texas drove away the wrong sites!

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

Yes that's literally what I said...

Sites beholden to these laws..

PornHub, sister sites, etc...

...are much less likely to be hosting CSAM.

Because of their moderation.

Obviously it's a big site and you can't get rid of it all, but the percentage is absolutely lower.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 9 months ago (1 children)

That's like saying a supermarket that's burning to the ground is experiencing a record low theft.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

If that's true, then even conservatives won't go to them.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

If you get downvoted once, everyone else has to downvote you too before they read your comment, it's the rule of lemmy.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 92 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (3 children)

Honestly, this feels like a canary in a coalmine. A coalmine that we've known to be on fire, but a canary nonetheless.

12 states total. That's like a quarter of the country.

2025 is gonna be a wild ride..

[–] [email protected] 52 points 9 months ago

Ironically their leader pays porn stars to have sex with him which obviously is not a problem for their voters.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 9 months ago

Just imagine how angry everyone is going to be when they can't masturbate the pain of Present Day away

[–] [email protected] 10 points 9 months ago (3 children)

Ok What is the canary wearing?

[–] [email protected] 13 points 9 months ago

Oh step-canary!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 55 points 9 months ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 55 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Banning porn nationwide is part of Project 2025's plan. defeatproject2025.org

[–] [email protected] 7 points 9 months ago

Republicans plotting in the open to install an authoritarian theocracy? Sounds serious!

So when will democrats drop gun control considering this imminent threat?

Armed queers bash back.

SocialistRA.org

[–] [email protected] 44 points 9 months ago

Conservatism / Religiosity is a plague that's been retarding our species since the dawn of man.

[–] [email protected] 42 points 9 months ago (1 children)

This is part one of the religious rights plan to go after porn sites and their patrons. Don’t give them your ID. If they get power, it will come back on you.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I don't think pornhub wants your ID.

I live in Texas and just tested the site to see if anyone has changed. It hasn't since they essentially shut down here.

It's a full page statement about Texas politicians.

There's no option to submit an ID even if a person wanted to do so.

But maybe I've misunderstood who "them" is in your comment.

[–] [email protected] 46 points 9 months ago (1 children)

It's not pornhub that wants your id, it's the facist states, so they can have a registry of who's not aligned with their puritanical ideals.

[–] [email protected] 40 points 9 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 34 points 9 months ago

Oh yes the same Republicans that want to save the children also want to marry them..

[–] [email protected] 18 points 9 months ago (2 children)

A blog post from Pornhub said that its latest locations for shutdowns are Idaho, Indiana, Kansas, Kentucky and Nebraska. The site said it would end operations in those states in July 2024. The website closed in Texas last week, and has also blocked access to its site in Arkansas, Mississippi, Montana, North Carolina, Utah, and Virginia in response to similar state legislation.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 9 months ago

Time to invest in VPN companies..

[–] [email protected] 15 points 9 months ago
[–] [email protected] 12 points 9 months ago (1 children)

As far as they know I’m from the Netherlands.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 9 months ago (3 children)

XVideos will get more popular.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

I just tested with my VPN and indeed xvideos doesn't give a shit if you're in Texas.

The A record for xvideos resolves to the Netherlands so that's probably why they don't give a shit.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 9 months ago

vpn stonks go up

[–] [email protected] 6 points 9 months ago (3 children)

So, I have a pretty alright VPN provider, but I've been looking for a self-hosted solution to allow me to say "Hey, if you're trying to hit www.domain.com, go through this VPN tunnel instead" but still run everything else straight through. Lots of options exist, I have one that would be perfect that we utilize at my company, but I haven't found a good solution that doesn't utilize enterprise level pricing.

Anyone got any tips on that front?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Tinyproxy

https://github.com/tinyproxy/tinyproxy/releases

Free Open source Upstream Http/s, socks4/5, direct redirection per site/URL/domain with regex. Can set default upstream proxy for everything else.

Invisible proxy Reverse proxy

Command line / simple text config

It's in your distros repo

It's available in termux.

It works.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 9 months ago (3 children)

You can use foxyproxy (browser extension) with SOCKS5 proxies to ssh tunnels to various hosts based on the URL pattern. Maybe too kludgey for your use case.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›