this post was submitted on 06 Jul 2024
1047 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

67422 readers
3531 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 183 points 8 months ago (7 children)

Don't worry folks, if we all stop using plastic straws and take 30 second showers, we'll be able to offset 5% of the carbon emissions this AI has!

[–] [email protected] 42 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (10 children)

Google ghg emissions in 2023 are 14.3 million metric tons. Which are a ridiculous percentage of global emissions.

Commercial aviation emissions are 935.000 million metric tons by year.

So IDK about plastic straws or google. But really if people stopped flying around so much that would actually make a dent on global emissions.

Don't get me wrong, google is a piece of shit. But they are not the ones causing climate change, neither is AI technology. Planes, cars, meat industry, offshore production... Those are some of the truly big culprits.

[–] [email protected] 37 points 8 months ago (1 children)

But they are not the ones causing climate change

The owners of google are capitalists. They are as responsible for climate change as any other capitalist.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Capitalists serve customers and do not operate in a vacuum. This finger pointing does nothing productive.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Capitalists ~~serve customers~~ hoard wealth through reckless profiteering irregardless of the costs to the rest of human society and do not operate in a vacuum.

FTFY. I do agree with your last part, though. The political racketeer establishments that enable them and the fascist security institutions that protect them are equally as culpable as they are.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 8 months ago (2 children)

i cant afford to ride airplanes. you are welcome.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 80 points 8 months ago (1 children)

The annoying part is how many mainstream tech companies have ham-fisted AI into every crevice of every product. It isn't necessary and I'm not convinced it results in a "better search result" for 90% of the crap people throw into Google. Basic indexed searches are fine for most use cases.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 8 months ago (1 children)

As a buzzword or whatever this is leagues worse than "agile", which I already loathed the overuse/integration of.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Before AI it was IoT. Nobody asked for an Internet connected toaster or fridge...

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 73 points 8 months ago (1 children)

If only Google had a working search engine before AI

[–] [email protected] 52 points 8 months ago

Yes, but now we can get much worse results and three pages of ads for ten times the energy cost. Capitalism at its finest.

[–] [email protected] 62 points 8 months ago (1 children)

And yet it's still garbage....like their search

[–] [email protected] 16 points 8 months ago (1 children)

With adblock enabled I feel like their results are often better than for example Duckduckgo. I recently switched to using DDG as my standard search engine but I regularly find myself using Google instead to get the results I'm looking for.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Interesting, I'm actually the exact opposite. I always start with Google, because it's usually good enough, but whenever it takes 2-3 tries to get something relevant, I switch to ddg and get it first try.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (8 children)

My issue is mostly with image search results. DDG's images tend to be less relevant than Google's. DDG also lacks "smart" results (idk the official term).

For example when you search "rng 25" on Google, it will immediately present you with a random number between 1 and 25. On DDG you have to click on one of the search results and then use some website to generate the number.

Or when searching for the results of a soccer game, Google will immediately present all the stats to you, while on DDG you will only find some articles about it.

Of course it really depends on the kind of search and I'm sure DDG will regularly have better results than Google too.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] [email protected] 62 points 8 months ago (8 children)

AI is just what crypto bros moved onto after people realized that was a scam. It's immature technology that uses absurd amounts of energy for a solution in search of a problem, being pushed as the future, all for the prospect of making more money. Except this time it's being backed by major corporations because it means fewer employees they have to pay.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 8 months ago (1 children)

There are legitimate uses of AI in certain fields like medical research and 3D reconstruction that aren't just a scam. However, most of these are not consumer facing and the average person won't really hear about them.

It's unfortunate that what you said is very true on the consumer side of things...

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 43 points 8 months ago (3 children)

I skimmed the article, but it seems to be assuming that Google's LLM is using the same architecture as everyone else. I'm pretty sure Google uses their TPU chips instead of a regular GPU like everyone else. Those are generally pretty energy efficient.

That and they don't seem to be considering how much data is just being cached for questions that are the same. And a lot of Google searches are going to be identical just because of the search suggestions funneling people into the same form of a question.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Exactly. The difference between a cached response and a live one even for non-AI queries is an OOM difference.

At this point, a lot of people just care about the 'feel' of anti-AI articles even if the substance is BS though.

And then people just feed whatever gets clicks and shares.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I hadn't really heard of the TPU chips until a couple weeks ago when my boss told me about how he uses USB versions for at-home ML processing of his closed network camera feeds. At first I thought he was using NVIDIA GPUs in some sort of desktop unit and just burning energy...but I looked the USB things up and they're wildly efficient and he says they work just fine for his applications. I was impressed.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 8 months ago

Yeah they're pretty impressive for some at home stuff and they're not even that costly.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 8 months ago

The Coral is fantastic for use cases that don't need large models. Object recognition for security cameras (using Blue Iris or Frigate) is a common use case, but you can also do things like object tracking (track where individual objects move in a video), pose estimation, keyphrase detection, sound classification, and more.

It runs Tensorflow Lite, so you can also build your own models.

Pretty good for a $25 device!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 33 points 8 months ago

The confounding part is that when I do get offered an "AI result", it's basically identical to the excerpt in the top "traditional search" result. It wasted a fair amount more time and energy to repeat what the top of the search said anyway. I've never seen the AI overview ever be more useful than the top snippet.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I build AI for a living, and I can tell you that generative AI is a crock of shit.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 31 points 8 months ago

And it’s only 10x more useless :)

[–] [email protected] 28 points 8 months ago

The results used to be better too. AI just produces junk faster.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 8 months ago (1 children)

If only they did what DuckDuckGo did and made it so it only popped up in very specific circumstances, primarily only drawing from current summarized information from Wikipedia in addition to its existing context, and allowed the user to turn it off completely in one click of a setting toggle.

I find it useful in DuckDuckGo because it's out of the way, unobtrusive, and only pops up when necessary. I've tried using Google with its search AI enabled, and it was the most unusable search engine I've used in years.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 8 months ago (1 children)

DDG has also gotten much worse since the introduction of AI features.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 8 months ago

I haven't had any problems myself.

In fact, I regularly use their anonymized LLM Chat tab to help out with restructuring data, summarizing some more complex topics, or finding some info that doesn't readily appear near the top of search. It's made my search experience (again, specifically in my circumstance) much better than before.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 8 months ago (5 children)

I'm genuinely curious where their penny picking went? All of tech companies shove ads into our throats and steal our privacy justifying that by saying they operate at loss and need to increase income. But suddenly they can afford spending huge amounts on some shit that won't give them any more income. How do they justify it then?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

It's another untapped market they can monopolize. (Or just run at a loss because investors are happy with another imaginary pot of gold at the end of another rainbow.)

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 8 months ago (7 children)

Where are all the people that were so damn pissed with Bitcoins power consumption now?

Or was it never about the power consumption in the first place and now that little Timmy has an Ai buddy the waste of electricity is fine. SMH

It’s far more important that every country fixes how it legally generates power that isn’t green. Make burning coal illegal already.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 8 months ago (2 children)

You're literally responding to an article criticising the power consumption of ai. What do you mean where are the people? They're right here.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 8 months ago

We hate both.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 8 months ago

I'd think there's some serious god damn overlap between the groups that are pissed about these things.

Or was it never about the power consumption in the first place and now that little Timmy has an Ai buddy the waste of electricity is fine. SMH

I don't think I want to waste my energy on hating these hypocrite Timmies since I haven't yet encountered a single one of them.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 8 months ago

This is terrible. Why don't we build nuclear power plants, rollout a carbon tax, and put incentives for companies to make their own energy via renewables?

You know the shit that we should have been doing before I was born.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 8 months ago

Wow AI is just so amazing

[–] [email protected] 7 points 8 months ago

I wonder what the power consumption of getting to the information in the summary is as a whole when using a regular search, clicking on multiple links, finding the right information and extracting the relevant parts. Including the expenditures of energy by the human performing the task and everything that surrounds the activity.

There are real concerns surrounding AI, I wonder if this is truly one of them or if it’s just poorly researched ragebait.

load more comments
view more: next ›