this post was submitted on 31 Jul 2024
494 points (100.0% liked)

News

28376 readers
4258 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 59 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Kamala isn’t perfect but she at least gives me hope that we will escape this dystopian fascist nightmare.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Idk about escape, but she can help us delay it's worsening for a bit longer lol.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 8 months ago

Give her the house and senant and we stand a good chance.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Demographics will bring about the extinction of the republican traitor filth. Delaying for a few cycles may be all that’s necessary to save the Republic.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

It's been remarkably resilient over the decades. The Civil War didn't kill the mentality. Reconstruction didn't kill the mentality. The Great Depression and New Deal didn't kill the mentality. You can't count on it going away on its own.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago (1 children)

None of those have faced the test of shifting demographics. The country will be majority minority in 2 decades.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

You can't take it for granted that those newly formed majority-minority groups will be further to the left. Just for starters, Democrats took for granted that Latino groups in Florida and Texas would vote for them, and it hasn't always worked out.

[–] [email protected] 40 points 8 months ago (1 children)

She's electric! In politics I've never seen such a sudden instantaneous jolt of energy and enthusiasm happen basically overnight! iirc even Obama didn't get quite as many people excited as quickly as Harris is doing! iirc even several weeks after Obama got the nomination there were still a good amount of nay sayers and fence sitters

[–] [email protected] 31 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Don't get me wrong. I'm extremely happy for the change, but I think the excitement you're seeing is more indicative of how much anxiety everyone was feeling about the future of this country if Biden stubbornly stayed in, and the sudden wave of relief they're feeling now. If Biden hadn't decided to run again at let the primary process do it's job to select a candidate, we might now have someone even better positioned to defeat Trump.

[–] [email protected] 40 points 8 months ago

Shawn Fain is a powerhouse. I hope good things will come from this.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 8 months ago (2 children)

I think it's clear that Harris is a better labor pick tha Trump but I think it's stragically a mistake to do this before the convention and give up the leverage to force a better party platform. There may be things happening behind the scenes but Democrats have a long history of being underwhelming on labor issues (obviously they're still better than the GOP though).

[–] [email protected] 57 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Biden went down to the UAW picket line and addressed them personally. I don't think it's really all that surprising that they backed his personally chosen replacement.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 8 months ago (3 children)

Biden also effectively sided with industry and against the labor unions in the 2022 railroad labor dispute. He’s not exactly squeaky clean here.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Not entirely correct. They did force the railroad workers back to work yes, but, Biden continued to work with them after the fact and got them the sick days and shit they were looking for

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

~~Sick day. One. They were asking for fifteen.~~

[–] [email protected] 23 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Incorrect.

4 + 3 convertible was the followup, the one day plus 14% pay increase and a further 24% guaranteed over 5 years was the early resolution.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 8 months ago

Oh good to know! Thanks for info.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 8 months ago

I just I want to thank you for helping correct that stupid piece of misinformation they get spread so much on here.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Biden continued to work with them after the fact and got them the sick days and shit they were looking for

Nope. He only got them sick day(s). They wanted other things, mainly safety features so trains don't crash as often. The sick days part was the most emphasized because it's easier for laymen to understand, but Biden did not give them what they wanted.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

I’m not certain what exactly they were originally looking for but my point is more that trying to paint Biden as some anti union traitor is plain not factual.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 8 months ago

So he didn't get them the 14% raise with another 24% over the next 5 years? Did I dream that?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 8 months ago

Okay, but we're talking about the UAW. He did them a solid, they're doing one in return.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 8 months ago

This was during a time when the US was finally getting back on its feet and "supply chain" excuses were starting to fade away...he did everything he could to prevent those shutdowns from crippling us again.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 8 months ago

As good as strategic endorsements are, its probably not feasible given union's structure in the us. I'm not a UAW member, so I may be misinformed on specifics, but these things are usually done as a vote at a union convention, by union members who are volunteering to be a voting delegate on top of their normal job.

Scheduling an emergency meeting to decide on endorsements pending a commitment from a candidate is not something you can reasonably do, especially when the voting membership are volunteers. Unions are democratic organizations, and can't act quickly enough for strategic endorsements like you propose.

Democrats in the white house means better members on the national labor relations board. That alone is enough to justify an endorsement even without any legislative concessions.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 8 months ago

Associated Press Media Bias Fact Check Credibility: [High] (Click to view Full Report)

Name: Associated Press Bias: Left-Center
Factual Reporting: High
Country: United States of America
Full Report: https://mediabiasfactcheck.com/associated-press/

Check the bias and credibility of this article on Ground.News


Thanks to Media Bias Fact Check for their access to the API.
Please consider supporting them by donating.

Footer

Beep boop. This action was performed automatically. If you dont like me then please block me.💔
If you have any questions or comments about me, you can make a post to LW Support lemmy community.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 months ago

I'm a currently laid off UAW member, get me my heckin' job back Kamala I got kids to feed