this post was submitted on 04 Aug 2024
134 points (100.0% liked)

politics

23875 readers
3233 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
all 36 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 73 points 10 months ago (4 children)

As a Minnesotan, please not Walz. As an American, please Walz.

[–] [email protected] 44 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Sorry 'bout that. He literally would give Harris a massive boost in Wisconsin, Michigan, and Minnesota.

Your semi-loss is everyone's gain. He's gonna be the guy.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Why he won't be the one. They going make the worse choice.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago

As is tradition.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 10 months ago

We in Michigan appreciate your sacrifice

[–] [email protected] 8 points 10 months ago

You'd still have Peggy Flanagan!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 months ago

Had me in the first half.

[–] morphballganon 34 points 10 months ago (2 children)

I knew Walz was the progressive option, but I'm glad to see he has a sense of humor too.

[–] [email protected] 68 points 10 months ago (1 children)

His sense of humor for those unable to check

At 60, Walz is just a year older than Harris, but critics say he looks much older, which could be a liability to a campaign that is rebounding from Biden's departure over concerns about his age.

Walz responded to this criticism on X, saying he looks the way he does because he was a high school teacher and "supervised the lunchroom for 20 years. You do not leave that job with a full head of hair. Trust me."

[–] [email protected] 14 points 10 months ago

As a Minnesotan I'd like to point out that Walz really isn't a progressive, however, like Biden, he's repeatedly shown a willingness to welcome everyone to the table, and (generally) not stand in the way of progressive legislation, even when he personally doesn't agree, so definitely not the worst choice. But I say double down on minority women, nominate lieutenant governor Peggy Flanagan instead, let's get the first native woman in the White House!

[–] [email protected] 14 points 10 months ago (3 children)

I wish it could be Buttigieg, but he can continue to be just as effective as he's been without weighing down the ticket.

Kelly is the perfect choice for this race.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 10 months ago

I agree that Kelly is the best choice. War veteran is a big plus for Harris, who's never been in the military. And everybody loves astronauts, those guys are hardcore and have been to space.

I know how important policy is, but let's be honest when it's an all-out fight against the end of the fucking free world? Yeah, it's a popularity contest. It's stupid, but you got to do what you got to do. And as long as they do it legitimately, thus being able to hold the ethical high ground, and they could stop on Trump hard enough, it's a win that he will probably never recover from. Just because he's too old and his mind is decaying too quickly.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Why would Buttigieg weigh down the ticket? He's been slaying the opposition on Fox News while their pundits sit there in slack jawed awe. He's shown his progressive chops on multiple occasions and, best of all, he's not old as fuck.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I love Mayor Pete for all the reasons you've said and more. I hope he is our president one day. He is the realization of the ideal politician imagined by Aaron Sorkin in shows like The West Wing and The Newsroom, and he has the rhetorical chops to put Josh and Toby to shame.

But he'd be weighing down the ticket with yet another Leftist Perversion of the Natural Order, e.g. he's openly gay. You can't serve the American People (who are an essentially stupid entity when taken together) a black-indian-woman-prosecutor with a side of openly-gay-silver-tongued-navy-daddy. Too rich. They'll get indigestion. That's too many LPNOs and too many "firsts". You need something a little more bland and safe as a palate cleanser.

But Buttigeig 2032, for sure.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 months ago

who are an essentially stupid entity when taken together

“None of us is as dumb as all of us.”

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

You must be joking. Kelly is a nobody.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 10 months ago (1 children)

If he was a nobody he wouldn't be part of her list. I think you can do better than that.

What does a Kamala candicacy need from a VP, other than an old-but-not-too-old white man who doesn't say much and doesn't steal she show but conveys a sense of quiet competence to illustrate a kind of chaperone character for the benefit of older people who want to be progressive but are still basically racist? Not much if you ask me, this is the Kamala show. But having a tough looking mother fucking Astronaut whose wife survived an assassination attempt neutralizes so many Trump/Vance talking points right out of the gate, freeing up Kamala to be Kamala.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 10 months ago

This is basically the best formulation of the argument I've seen so far. Don't forget he's a combat decorated Navy captain too. He has so many lowest common denominator points to reel in both the demographics you mentioned but also casual voters in general who don't care about policy.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 10 months ago (1 children)

No Beshear? I'm a little surprised.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 10 months ago

Reuters - News Source Context (Click to view Full Report)Information for Reuters:

MBFC: Least Biased - Credibility: High - Factual Reporting: Very High - United Kingdom
Wikipedia about this source

Search topics on Ground.Newshttps://www.reuters.com/world/us/harris-interviews-walz-kelly-shapiro-her-home-vice-president-pick-2024-08-04/
~Media~ ~Bias~ ~Fact~ ~Check~ ~|~ ~bot~ ~support~

[–] [email protected] 8 points 10 months ago
[–] [email protected] 5 points 10 months ago