this post was submitted on 17 Aug 2024
1260 points (100.0% liked)

Comic Strips

15740 readers
2211 users here now

Comic Strips is a community for those who love comic stories.

The rules are simple:

Web of links

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
all 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] QBertReynolds@sh.itjust.works 160 points 7 months ago (2 children)
[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 200 points 7 months ago (3 children)

Was going to say...

A judge agreed with her, and the June ticket was dismissed.

Still, it is annoying that state and municipal officers can drag you to court in your pregnant condition to prove what the legislature has already decided.

Almost as though the police exist to harass and obstruct the rights of citizens, rather than to serve and protect them.

[–] acockworkorange@mander.xyz 71 points 7 months ago

The judge only agreed because if they denied, their stupid abortion laws would have to be revisited.

[–] Jolteon@lemmy.zip 5 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

Hey, at least they're consistent. Also, I can't think of anybody who wants abortion at 34 weeks.

[–] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

God does, they create miscarriages all the time.

[–] DerArzt@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

But God doesn't kill people /s

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

You've never heard of a still born birth?

[–] Kadaj21@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Who wants a still born birth?

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 4 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Not many people. But under the current laws around abortion, hospital administrators are too afraid of legal liability to remove a dead baby from the mother.

Case in point

More than 100 pregnant women in medical distress who sought help from emergency rooms were turned away or negligently treated since 2022, an Associated Press analysis of federal hospital investigations found.

Two women — one in Florida and one in Texas — were left to miscarry in public restrooms. In Arkansas, a woman went into septic shock and her fetus died after an emergency room sent her home. At least four other women with ectopic pregnancies had trouble getting treatment, including one in California who needed a blood transfusion after she sat for nine hours in an emergency waiting room.

Hospital staff are being told not to treat pregnant women, entirely, because any form of treatment might be flagged as "aiding in an abortion" by the state.

[–] Kadaj21@lemmy.world 2 points 7 months ago

Your initial response read to me that there were folks wishing for still borns.

But yeah the stories are typically horrifying, like the one mother in Texas who had the means to flee out of state to get the healthcare she needed.

[–] PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee 71 points 7 months ago

I like how she admitted she didn't think of the political ramifications and was just working the exploit she'd been given XD

[–] riskable@programming.dev 112 points 7 months ago (1 children)

In Texas, a pregnant black woman or immigrant only counts as 1 and 1/5th person though.

[–] Macallan@lemmy.world 14 points 7 months ago (2 children)

1 and ⅕? So more than a regular person? Did you mean just ⅕?

[–] ebc@lemmy.ca 80 points 7 months ago (1 children)

He meant 3/5 (the mother) plus 3/5 (the child), so a total of 6/5.

[–] Macallan@lemmy.world 13 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Ahh yes ⅗ ... I had it wrong ... Damnit!

[–] riskable@programming.dev 13 points 7 months ago

Don't feel too bad. I had to think about it hard after I wrote the sentence. Then I thought about it some more, triple checked my work using a fractions calculator, then finally hit the submit button 🤣

Fractions are hard. Normal people don't think in fractions (anymore; they probably used to in days of yore).

[–] Raptor_007@lemmy.world 81 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[–] rbos@lemmy.ca 79 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (3 children)

Aren't there laws against children, babies etc riding in the front seat? Could backfire. /s

[–] mosiacmango@lemm.ee 49 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Children and babies, not fetuses. Should be fine.

[–] rbos@lemmy.ca 3 points 7 months ago

Yeah. Sorry, /s.

[–] Burn_The_Right@lemmy.world 26 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

If it's a legitimate car crash, a woman's body has ways of shutting that whole thing down.

-Republicans

[–] thenextguy@lemmy.world 10 points 7 months ago (2 children)

What if I'm the one that's high?

High Occupant Vehicle lane?

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 1 points 7 months ago

You don't even have to be pregnant. If they want to ban the morning after pill, a contingency that can be used before you even know you're pregnant, then just getting nutted in is enough.

[–] rumschlumpel@feddit.org 7 points 7 months ago (3 children)

They have dedicated carpool lanes?

[–] wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world 6 points 7 months ago (6 children)

(almost?) all US state highways do, yes

[–] rumschlumpel@feddit.org 7 points 7 months ago
[–] Trainguyrom@reddthat.com 2 points 7 months ago

Seems to depend on the area. Traveling around the Midwest I basically never see them, but they're huge in California for example

[–] Chakravanti@lemmy.ml 2 points 7 months ago

Not in Indiana.

[–] lolcatnip@reddthat.com 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

I wouldn't say almost all. Less than half in my experience (mostly in TX and WA).

[–] pixelscript@lemm.ee 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Live in the midwest and I've never seen one.

Minneapolis/St. Paul might have one I've just never encountered. They for sure have express lanes, which themselves are a feature I have only ever seen there and no where else in the surrounding region.

[–] Crashumbc@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

They are only in very congested high traffic areas. Near some large cities.

[–] mr_satan@monyet.cc 3 points 7 months ago (2 children)

What's a carpool lane? Do we have them in Europe?

[–] sushibowl@feddit.nl 6 points 7 months ago (1 children)

It's a highway lane that you're only allowed to drive on if you have multiple people driving in the car. So you could avoid traffic, for example. It's supposed to reduce the number of cars on the road.

There is one in Norway it seems, in Trondheim.

[–] johannesvanderwhales@lemmy.world 1 points 7 months ago

These days it seems like a lot of states are just allowing people to pay a fee to use them, though.

[–] tostiman@sh.itjust.works 1 points 7 months ago

Yes! I saw one while on vacation in France. It was in Lyon, i think? Look up 'France diamond lane'

[–] PM_Your_Nudes_Please@lemmy.world 3 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Yes, the US tends to call them HOV (High Occupancy Vehicle, or Human Ordinance Vehicle) lanes, and they’re typically denoted by a large diamond painted along the center of the lane. Usually the far left lane on the highway, so it’s even past the fast lane. It often has limited entry/exit, and is often a double-solid white lane marker, meaning you’re not allowed to enter or exit the lane except at specific points. Sometimes there are even soft barriers, to further deter people from entering/exiting except at the designated points.

It’s a lane that is reserved for moving people rather than cargo; You’re only allowed to travel in if you have more than one person in the car, or are on a motorcycle. The theory is that by restricting specific lanes to carpoolers, you’ll encourage more people to carpool and have fewer cars on the road. And by restricting lane changes, you avoid slowdowns from people entering/exiting the lane. You typically only see them in major metropolitan areas with lots of commuter traffic.

In reality, it’s one of the most commonly broken traffic laws, with commuters often camping in the HOV lane even when they’re by themselves. Or people attempting to use it as a faster version of the fast lane. It is typically only a minor traffic ticket if you get caught. So enforcement is often very lax, and cops will often only pull you over for it if they’re looking for an easy ticket.

This comic is referencing a lady was pulled over in Texas, and cited for being in the HOV lane without another person in the car. She argued in court that she was pregnant, and since Texas considers fetuses to be alive, the court had to dismiss the ticket because she had a second person in the car. The judge ruled in her favor, mostly to avoid creating a major challenge to written laws over a minor traffic ticket.

[–] rumschlumpel@feddit.org 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Thank you for the detailed explanation!

[–] ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works 4 points 7 months ago (4 children)

I have never seen an HOV lane that didn't require vehicles to have at least three people, but maybe she's pregnant with twins.

[–] Xenny@lemmy.world 34 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Conversely I've never seen one that required more than two!

[–] Trainguyrom@reddthat.com 10 points 7 months ago

Which is sad because it really says something about how people commute and travel that getting just 2 people into one car is a bar high enough that most vehicles on a given highway can't meet it

[–] JohnnyH842@lemmy.world 13 points 7 months ago

My experience in WA and OR has all been 2+ passengers. The bar is low

[–] wreckedcarzz@lemmy.world 8 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

AZ is 2 or more

E: or alternative fuel/hybrid/EV, with special plates

[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 1 points 7 months ago

MA I-93 in Boston is 2 or more.